Solutions Manual for Juvenile Delinquency: Theory, Practice, and Law, 14th Edition (Larry J. Siegel, 2023) | All Chapters 1–15 Covered

?? ??
EK ED
GE OV
ED PR
AP
M
?_
?_ IA
IA UV
UV ST
ST

, TABLE OF CONTENTS
Solutions Manual: Juvenile Delinquency: Theory, Practice, and Law,
14th Edition
Author: Larry Siegel
ST




??
Part One. The Concept of Delinquency
UV



EK
Chapter 1. Childhood and Delinquency
Chapter 2. The Nature and Extent of Delinquency




GE
IA

Part Two. Theories of Delinquency
Chapter 3. Individual-Level Views of Delinquency
Chapter 4. Structure, Process, Culture, and Delinquency
?_
ED
Chapter 5. Social Reaction, Social Conflict, and Delinquency
Chapter 6. Developmental Theories of Delinquency: Life-Course, Propensity, and Trajectory
AP

Part Three. Social, Community, and Environmental Influences on
_M

Delinquency
Chapter 7. Gender and Delinquency
PR

Chapter 8. The Family and Delinquency
Chapter 9. Peers and Delinquency: Gangs, Groups, and Cliques
A?



Chapter 10. Schools and Delinquency
OV

Chapter 11. Drug Use and Delinquency
VI




Part Four. The Juvenile Justice System
Chapter 12. Juvenile Justice: Then and Now
ED
U




Chapter 13. Police Work with Juveniles
14. Juvenile Court Process: Pretrial, Trial, and Disposition
ST




15. Juvenile Corrections: Probation, Community Treatment, and Institutionalization
? ?

, Solution and Answer Guide: Siegel, Juvenile Delinquency, 9780357763834; Chapter 1: Childhood and Delinquency




Solution and Answer Guide
SIEGEL , JUVENILE DELINQUENCY , 9780357763834; CHAPTER 1: CHILDHOOD AND
DELINQUENCY
ST




??
TABLE OF CONTENTS
UV
End of Section Exercise Solutions...................................................................................................... 1




EK
END OF SECTION EXERCISE SOLUTIONS




GE
IA
1. Is it fair to have a separate legal category for youths? Considering how dangerous
young people can be, does it make more sense to group offenders based on what they
have done and not on their age?
?_
Solution
ED
This is a tough question that is open to some interpretation. One hand, it is absolutely
fair to have a separate legal category for youths, as research indicates that brain
AP
development is not complete until age 25, so rational decision making might not exist.
On the other hand, a valid argument exists for crime being a crime regardless of age.
M
Whether a 17-year-old murders someone or a 26-year-old murders someone, the
crime is still murder. Either point of view is valid.
PR
2. At what age are juveniles truly capable of understanding the seriousness of their
?_

actions?

Solution
According to Timothy v. Superior Court, an 11-year-old child is not capable of
IA

OV
understanding the legal proceedings or assisting in their own defense. Delinquent
behavior is sanctioned less heavily than criminality because the law considers juveniles
as being less responsible for their behavior than adults. As a class, adolescents are
believed to (a) have a stronger preference for risk and novelty, (b) assess the
UV




potentially negative consequences of risky conduct less unfavorably than adults, (c)
have a tendency to be impulsive and more concerned with short-term than long-term
ED
consequences, (d) have a different appreciation of time and self-control, and (e) be
more susceptible to peer pressure. All of these qualities should be considered when
determining if a juvenile is capable of understanding the seriousness of their actions.
ST




3. Is it fair to institutionalize a minor simply for being truant or running away from home?
??
Should the jurisdiction of status offenders be removed from juvenile court and placed
with the state department of social services or some other welfare organization?

Solution
The answer in past years would have been yes. Additionally, opposition to
institutionalizing status offenders was common in the past. However, the Office of



© 2024 Cengage. 1

, Solution and Answer Guide: Siegel, Juvenile Delinquency, 9780357763834; Chapter 1: Childhood and Delinquency


Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) made it a top priority to
encourage the removal of status offenders from secure lockups, detention centers,
and post-disposition treatment facilities that also housed delinquent offenders. Such
incarceration has been found to be harmful to some status offenders. Evidence
supports positive outcomes when status offenders receive assistance from social
ST
service organizations.




??
4. Should delinquency proceedings be confidential? Does the public have the right to
know who juvenile criminals are?
UV



EK
Solution
Again, this is another difficult question. Either side has a valid argument, but
realistically, in an era when we as a society are attempting to become more
transparent, the public may have some right to know who the juvenile criminals are,
especially if the juvenile has committed a number of crimes and these crimes are




GE
IA
serious felonies. But, first time delinquents and less serious delinquents could
reasonably have their proceedings be secret.

5. Can a get-tough policy help control juvenile misbehavior, or should parens patriae
?_
remain the standard?

Solution
ED
The parens patriae policy should remain the standard. Research in all areas indicates
that get-tough policies are not effective for a variety of reasons, and there is no
AP
reason to make this change.
M
6. Should juveniles who commit felonies such as rape or robbery be treated as adults?

Solution
PR
This is not a straightforward question and hence does not have a straightforward
?_

answer. Each case should be looked at separately when the decision comes as to
whether or not a juvenile who commits a felony such as rape or robbery should be
treated as an adult. Generally, first-time delinquents, regardless of offense, should be
treated as juveniles in juvenile court where rehabilitation is still the goal. However,
IA

OV
should a juvenile commit a subsequent offense of the same or similar nature that is a
serious and violent offense, then perhaps these cases are in need of being waived to
adult court.
UV



ED
ST




??