MASTER STUDY GUIDE
Complete Notes for Contracts, Torts, Criminal Law, Constitutional Law, Civil Procedure &
Property
■ CONTRACTS ■ TORTS
■ CRIMINAL LAW ■ CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
■ CIVIL PROCEDURE ■ PROPERTY LAW
2026 Edition | Law School & Bar Exam Ready | Case Briefs + Black-Letter Law + Exam
Tips
FEATURES INCLUDED
✓ Black-letter law rules with element breakdowns
✓ Landmark case briefs (Facts-Issue-Ruling-Ratio)
✓ Bar exam-style practice questions with model answers
✓ Memory aids, mnemonics & exam strategy tips
✓ Comparison tables for similar/confusing concepts
✓ Quick reference cheat sheets for last-minute review
,■ TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Contracts 3
1.1 Formation of Contracts 3
1.2 Consideration 4
1.3 Defenses to Formation 5
1.4 Breach & Remedies 6
1.5 Third-Party Rights 7
2. Torts 8
2.1 Intentional Torts 8
2.2 Negligence 9
2.3 Strict Liability & Defenses 10
3. Criminal Law 11
3.1 Elements of Crimes 11
3.2 Inchoate Offenses & Parties to Crime 12
3.3 Defenses 13
4. Constitutional Law 14
4.1 Structure of Government 14
4.2 Individual Rights 15
4.3 Equal Protection & Due Process 16
5. Civil Procedure 17
5.1 Jurisdiction & Venue 17
5.2 Pleadings & Discovery 18
5.3 Trial & Judgment 19
6. Property Law 20
6.1 Present Estates & Future Interests 20
6.2 Landlord & Tenant 21
6.3 Easements & Covenants 22
7. Exam Cheat Sheets & Quick Reference 23
, 1. CONTRACTS
Contracts form the foundation of commercial law. A contract is a legally enforceable
agreement between two or more parties. Mastery of contract law is essential for the bar exam
and practice.
1.1 Formation of Contracts
A valid contract requires: (1) Offer, (2) Acceptance, (3) Consideration, and (4) No defenses to formation.
Additionally, the parties must have capacity and the purpose must be legal.
KEY CONCEPT - The Offer:
An offer is a manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, made in a way that justifies another person in
understanding that their assent is invited and will conclude the bargain. Requirements of a Valid Offer: - Intent
to be bound (objective standard - would a reasonable person believe an offer was made?) - Definite and certain
terms (parties, subject matter, price, quantity) - Communication to the offeree Not an Offer: - Invitations to
bid/negotiate: Advertisements, price quotes, invitations to make an offer - Preliminary negotiations:
Statements like "I might sell for $500" or "I am thinking about..." - Statements of opinion: "This car is worth
$10,000" (not a promise to sell) Termination of Offers: - Revocation: Offeror withdraws before acceptance
(effective when received) - Rejection: Offeree declines (effective when received) - Counteroffer: Offeree
proposes different terms (rejects original offer) - Lapse of time: Offer expires after stated time or reasonable
time - Death or incapacity: Of offeror (automatic termination) - Destruction of subject matter: Before
acceptance Irrevocable Offers: - Option contracts: Separate consideration paid to keep offer open - Firm
offers (UCC): Merchant's signed written offer to buy/sell goods, irrevocable for up to 90 days - Detrimental
reliance (Promissory Estoppel): Offeree reasonably relies to their detriment
KEY CONCEPT - Acceptance:
Acceptance is an unequivocal assent to the terms of the offer. The acceptance must be the "mirror image" of the
offer (common law). Methods of Acceptance: - Express: Oral or written "I accept" - Implied: By conduct (e.g.,
shipping goods in response to an order) - Silence: Generally NOT acceptance, unless: (1) Offeree takes benefit
of services with reasonable opportunity to reject (2) Parties have prior course of dealing where silence =
acceptance Mailbox Rule: - Acceptance is effective when dispatched (placed in mailbox, sent by reasonable
means) - Revocation is effective when received - Rejection is effective when received - Exception: If offeree
sends rejection THEN acceptance, whichever arrives first controls UCC Battle of the Forms (UCC 2-207): -
Between merchants, additional terms become part of the contract UNLESS: (1) They materially alter the contract,
OR (2) The offeror objects - Different terms: knock out rule (both terms fall out, gap-fillers apply)
Case Brief: Lucy v. Zehmer (1954)
Facts: Zehmer wrote a contract to sell his farm to Lucy on a napkin while drinking at a bar. Zehmer later claimed
he was joking and too drunk to be serious. Issue: Was there a valid contract despite Zehmer's subjective intent
to joke? Ruling: YES - valid contract enforceable. Ratio: Contract formation is determined by the objective
theory of contracts - what a reasonable person would believe, not the subjective intent of the parties. Zehmer's
outward manifestations (writing, discussing terms for 40 minutes) indicated serious intent.