1
PAD 502 Paper Critique Template Name: Personality, Behavior Characteristics, and Life
quality Impact of Children with Dyslexia
Paper Reference Information: Huang et al. (2020).
1. Has the author formulated a problem/issue? Is its significance (scope, severity,
relevance) clear?
Essentially, the authors formulated the problem and highlighted its significance. The
research problem of the paper is to investigate "family environment factors for dyslexia and to
evaluate the personality, behavior characteristics and life quality of children with dyslexia"
(Huang et al., 2020, p. 1). The scope includes a relatively small sample size as a total of 60
children with dyslexia and 180 healthy children aged 7-12, who speak Chinese from four
primary schools in Shantou City, China, were analyzed.
2. If quantitative research is used, are the hypotheses clear and testable? If a qualitative
approach is used, are the research questions clear?
The authors implemented a quantitative method to answer the research questions.
However, the hypotheses were not mentioned in the paper clearly. Only the introduction part
includes a few explanations of the authors' expectations. Scheel et al. (2020) claim that it is
unnecessary and counterproductive to test hypotheses before researchers establish a link between
theory and test. Hence, Huang et al. (2020) concentrated on developing concepts and measures
instead of testing hypotheses.
3. What is the author's research orientation (e.g., quantitative, qualitative, mixed)? Are
they approaching their research orientation in a consistent manner?
The authors' research orientation is quantitative because they collected the data through
questionnaires and tests. Obtaining quantitative data is not enough to provide accurate results.
, 2
Therefore, machine learning should analyze the data through different types of software (Zhang
& Feng, 2021). Consequently, the researchers analyzed and input the data with Epidata3.1 and
SPSS 24.0 software (Huang et al., 2020). Therefore, the authors are consistently approaching the
research, as the data were collected and analyzed precisely.
4. What is the relationship between the theoretical and research perspectives? Is there a
clear relationship? Inference? Or something else?
There is a clear relationship between the theoretical and research perspective. For
instance, the authors explained dyslexia and how it may affect children's life quality by using
secondary data, such as peer-evaluated articles and surveys. The authors affirm that the research
in this field is crucial to indicate the factors associated with dyslexia in order "to reduce the
severity of symptoms in children with dyslexia" (Huang et al., 2020).
5. Has the author evaluated the literature relevant to the problem/issue? Does the author
include literature taking positions she or he does not agree with?
The authors do not include literature taking positions they disagree with. Instead, Huang
et al. (2020) use the relevant literature and scholars' views to indicate the importance of the
research problem. Moreover, the main focus of the paper is on primary data obtained instead of
secondary data.
6. In a research study: How good are the basic components of the study design? How
accurate and valid are the measurements? Is the analysis of the data accurate and relevant to the
research question? Are the conclusions valid? Depth of response is requested here, not ‘yes’ or
‘no’.
The essential components of the study design, such as family environmental factors,
personality, behavioral characteristics, and life quality, are highly relevant to the research
PAD 502 Paper Critique Template Name: Personality, Behavior Characteristics, and Life
quality Impact of Children with Dyslexia
Paper Reference Information: Huang et al. (2020).
1. Has the author formulated a problem/issue? Is its significance (scope, severity,
relevance) clear?
Essentially, the authors formulated the problem and highlighted its significance. The
research problem of the paper is to investigate "family environment factors for dyslexia and to
evaluate the personality, behavior characteristics and life quality of children with dyslexia"
(Huang et al., 2020, p. 1). The scope includes a relatively small sample size as a total of 60
children with dyslexia and 180 healthy children aged 7-12, who speak Chinese from four
primary schools in Shantou City, China, were analyzed.
2. If quantitative research is used, are the hypotheses clear and testable? If a qualitative
approach is used, are the research questions clear?
The authors implemented a quantitative method to answer the research questions.
However, the hypotheses were not mentioned in the paper clearly. Only the introduction part
includes a few explanations of the authors' expectations. Scheel et al. (2020) claim that it is
unnecessary and counterproductive to test hypotheses before researchers establish a link between
theory and test. Hence, Huang et al. (2020) concentrated on developing concepts and measures
instead of testing hypotheses.
3. What is the author's research orientation (e.g., quantitative, qualitative, mixed)? Are
they approaching their research orientation in a consistent manner?
The authors' research orientation is quantitative because they collected the data through
questionnaires and tests. Obtaining quantitative data is not enough to provide accurate results.
, 2
Therefore, machine learning should analyze the data through different types of software (Zhang
& Feng, 2021). Consequently, the researchers analyzed and input the data with Epidata3.1 and
SPSS 24.0 software (Huang et al., 2020). Therefore, the authors are consistently approaching the
research, as the data were collected and analyzed precisely.
4. What is the relationship between the theoretical and research perspectives? Is there a
clear relationship? Inference? Or something else?
There is a clear relationship between the theoretical and research perspective. For
instance, the authors explained dyslexia and how it may affect children's life quality by using
secondary data, such as peer-evaluated articles and surveys. The authors affirm that the research
in this field is crucial to indicate the factors associated with dyslexia in order "to reduce the
severity of symptoms in children with dyslexia" (Huang et al., 2020).
5. Has the author evaluated the literature relevant to the problem/issue? Does the author
include literature taking positions she or he does not agree with?
The authors do not include literature taking positions they disagree with. Instead, Huang
et al. (2020) use the relevant literature and scholars' views to indicate the importance of the
research problem. Moreover, the main focus of the paper is on primary data obtained instead of
secondary data.
6. In a research study: How good are the basic components of the study design? How
accurate and valid are the measurements? Is the analysis of the data accurate and relevant to the
research question? Are the conclusions valid? Depth of response is requested here, not ‘yes’ or
‘no’.
The essential components of the study design, such as family environmental factors,
personality, behavioral characteristics, and life quality, are highly relevant to the research
