Wgu D265 Task 1 Template
Choose one of the case studies from the Case Study list in Supporting
Documents. Read the case study carefully.
Then, complete the evaluation of the case study by filling out the template
below. You will write your response to each item in the blank box
underneath each section.
For more information on each item below, you can review the Learning
Resource sections referenced in each section.
No more than 30% of your written response can match other sources.
Sudent ID: # 012629213
Case Study #1: Healthcare Case - REVISION
Please provide the labeled premise(s) and conclusion
Premise(s) of an argument from your selected case study below.
and
Conclusion Review Section 1, Lesson 2 in the course for help with
this task aspect.
Premise #1: Online caregivers in a health forum claim that sound
frequencies helped memory retention.
Premise #2: Daniel observed that his grandmother was mentally sharper
after listening to classical music.
Premise #3: A wellness influencer endorsed a new sound therapy
device that emits healing frequencies.
Conclusion: Therefore, the nurses are advised to try the sound therapy
device on the patient dealing with dementia.
In the box below, please describe whether the
argument is deductive or inductive.
Deductive/
Inductive
Review Section 1, Lesson 4 in the course for help with
this task aspect.
PAGE 1
, This argument is inductive. Daniel relies on his personal experience and
an online forum to suggest that the conclusion is likely true, rather than
on controlled testing, which makes it probable.
In the box below, please describe the argument.
For a deductive argument, explain whether it is valid or
invalid.
Validity/
Strength For an inductive argument, explain whether it is strong
or weak.
Review Section 1, Lesson 4 in the course for help with
this task aspect.
This argument is weak. Daniel’s argument rely on popularity and
anecdotal evidence rather than expert scientific research and testing.
These premises are not good reasons to support the conclusion.
Please provide a map of the argument in the box
below. Provide numbered circles to identify the
propositions (premises and conclusion) and arrows to
show support.
Map
See Section 4, Lesson 4 in the course of study to
understand argument mapping and see examples.
See “How To Create/Draw an Argument Map” in the
Supporting Document section.
(1) Online caregivers claim sound frequencies helped memory retention.
(2) Daniel’s grandmother seemed mentally sharper after listening to
classical music..
(3) A wellness influencer promotes the effectiveness of sound healing
therapy device.
(4) Nurses should try helping their patients with the sound therapy
device.
PAGE 2
Choose one of the case studies from the Case Study list in Supporting
Documents. Read the case study carefully.
Then, complete the evaluation of the case study by filling out the template
below. You will write your response to each item in the blank box
underneath each section.
For more information on each item below, you can review the Learning
Resource sections referenced in each section.
No more than 30% of your written response can match other sources.
Sudent ID: # 012629213
Case Study #1: Healthcare Case - REVISION
Please provide the labeled premise(s) and conclusion
Premise(s) of an argument from your selected case study below.
and
Conclusion Review Section 1, Lesson 2 in the course for help with
this task aspect.
Premise #1: Online caregivers in a health forum claim that sound
frequencies helped memory retention.
Premise #2: Daniel observed that his grandmother was mentally sharper
after listening to classical music.
Premise #3: A wellness influencer endorsed a new sound therapy
device that emits healing frequencies.
Conclusion: Therefore, the nurses are advised to try the sound therapy
device on the patient dealing with dementia.
In the box below, please describe whether the
argument is deductive or inductive.
Deductive/
Inductive
Review Section 1, Lesson 4 in the course for help with
this task aspect.
PAGE 1
, This argument is inductive. Daniel relies on his personal experience and
an online forum to suggest that the conclusion is likely true, rather than
on controlled testing, which makes it probable.
In the box below, please describe the argument.
For a deductive argument, explain whether it is valid or
invalid.
Validity/
Strength For an inductive argument, explain whether it is strong
or weak.
Review Section 1, Lesson 4 in the course for help with
this task aspect.
This argument is weak. Daniel’s argument rely on popularity and
anecdotal evidence rather than expert scientific research and testing.
These premises are not good reasons to support the conclusion.
Please provide a map of the argument in the box
below. Provide numbered circles to identify the
propositions (premises and conclusion) and arrows to
show support.
Map
See Section 4, Lesson 4 in the course of study to
understand argument mapping and see examples.
See “How To Create/Draw an Argument Map” in the
Supporting Document section.
(1) Online caregivers claim sound frequencies helped memory retention.
(2) Daniel’s grandmother seemed mentally sharper after listening to
classical music..
(3) A wellness influencer promotes the effectiveness of sound healing
therapy device.
(4) Nurses should try helping their patients with the sound therapy
device.
PAGE 2
