ChangingFactor-by-Factor
Nature of Warfare_
Changing
Analysis
Factor-by-Factor
Nature
of Smaller
of Warfare_
Wars
Analysis
–
Factor-by-Factor
Lecture
of Smaller
Notes
Wars
Analysis
_ Study
– Lecture
of
Material.pdf
Smaller
Notes
Wars
_ Study
– Lecture
Material.pdf
Notes _ Study Material.pdf
Changing Nature
of Warfare:
Factor-by-Factor
Analysis of Smaller
Wars – Lecture
Notes / Study
Material
Changing Nature of Warfare_
ChangingFactor-by-Factor
Nature of Warfare_
Changing
Analysis
Factor-by-Factor
Nature
of Smaller
of Warfare_
Wars
Analysis
–
Factor-by-Factor
Lecture
of Smaller
Notes
Wars
Analysis
_ Study
– Lecture
of
Material.pdf
Smaller
Notes
Wars
_ Study
– Lecture
Material.pdf
Notes _ Study Material.pdf
, Changing nature of warfare factor by factor- all smaller wars.pdf Changing nature of warfare factor by factor- all smaller wars.pdf Changing nature of warfare factor by factor- all smaller wars.pdf
Generalship Moltke (effective) at Danish war 1864 and Austro Prussian war 1866,
Britain at Crimea 1854 and France at Franco Prussian war (both
inneffective)
Moltke (Prussian dominance) Took over Danish War mid-conflict led to rapid victory
Used flexible planning + initiative (Auftragstaktik)
Shows generalship decisive when combined with strong system
Change: more modern, less rigid than Jomini
Key to Prussian dominance (1866, 1870)
Crimean war (British failures) Charge of Light Brigade (1854) caused by miscommunication between
Raglan → Nolan → Lucan → Cardigan
600 cavalry charged wrong target caused heavy losses
Shows poor generalship can override advantages (tech, numbers)
Highlights weakness in command structure
Franco Prussian war (French failures) Sedan (1870): 3 commanders in one day caused confusion
Shows lack of clear leadership = collapse of army effectiveness
Prussian victory shows system > individual leadership
Changing nature of warfare factor by factor- all smaller wars.pdf Changing nature of warfare factor by factor- all smaller wars.pdf Changing nature of warfare factor by factor- all smaller wars.pdf