NURS FPX 6011 EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE
ACTUAL EXAM WITH COMPLETE QUESTIONS
AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS (100%
VERIFIED ANSWERS) |ALREADY GRADED A+|
||PROFESSOR VERIFIED||
||BRANDNEW!!!||2026//2027!!!!!!
Mixed-methods studies are a combination of which two methodologies?
Correct Answer: B. Quantitative and qualitative research methodologies
Expert Rationale:
Mixed-methods research combines both quantitative and qualitative methodologies within a
single study to provide a more comprehensive understanding of a research problem. Quantitative
research focuses on numerical data, statistical analysis, measurement, and objective outcomes,
while qualitative research explores experiences, perceptions, meanings, and behaviors through
narrative data. By integrating both approaches, researchers are able to strengthen the validity of
findings, capture complex healthcare phenomena, and gain both statistical and contextual
insights that may not be achieved through a single methodology alone.
DIF: Knowledge
REF: Research Methodology / Mixed-Methods Research
OBJ: Identify characteristics of mixed-methods research
TOP: Nursing Research / Evidence-Based Practice
Both literature reviews and systematic reviews are types of research evidence reviews.
Correct Answer: True
Expert Rationale:
Literature reviews and systematic reviews are both considered forms of research evidence
reviews because they evaluate and summarize existing scholarly evidence on a particular topic.
A literature review provides a broad overview and synthesis of available research, often
identifying trends, theories, or gaps in knowledge. In contrast, a systematic review follows a
highly structured and rigorous methodology to identify, appraise, and synthesize all relevant
studies addressing a specific clinical or research question. Both review types support evidence-
based practice by helping healthcare professionals make informed decisions based on current
scientific evidence.
DIF: Knowledge
REF: Evidence-Based Practice / Research Reviews
,OBJ: Differentiate types of evidence reviews
TOP: Nursing Research / Evidence Synthesis
What type of information would help you identify a research study as qualitative? (Select
all that apply.)
Correct Answers:
A. Data is collected using such approaches as interviews, focus groups, and open-ended
questions on surveys.
D. Results are reported using themes and words.
Expert Rationale:
Qualitative research is designed to explore human experiences, perceptions, beliefs, and social
interactions in depth. This type of research commonly uses data collection methods such as
interviews, focus groups, observations, and open-ended survey questions to gather rich
descriptive information from participants. Findings are typically analyzed for patterns and
presented as themes, narratives, or categories rather than numerical statistics. These
characteristics distinguish qualitative studies from quantitative research, which relies primarily
on measurable variables, numerical data, and statistical analysis.
DIF: Application
REF: Qualitative Research Methodology
OBJ: Recognize characteristics of qualitative research
TOP: Nursing Research / Research Design
When trying to determine what type of research study is described in an article, which two
sections of the article will give you the best information to make that determination?
Correct Answer: C. Methods and results
Expert Rationale:
The methods and results sections of a research article provide the clearest and most reliable
information for identifying the type of research study conducted. The methods section explains
how the study was designed, including the sample selection, research design, data collection
procedures, and statistical analyses used. This information allows the reader to determine
whether the study is qualitative, quantitative, experimental, descriptive, correlational, or another
research type. The results section complements this by presenting the findings and type of data
generated from the study. Together, these sections provide sufficient evidence to accurately
classify the research design. Other sections, such as the introduction or discussion, may provide
background information or interpretation but are less reliable for identifying the actual study
methodology.
DIF: Application
REF: Nursing Research / Research Design
OBJ: Identify components used to determine research study design
TOP: Evidence-Based Practice / Nursing Process Step: Assessment
,Order the following types of research evidence reviews in order of rigor from most
rigorous to least rigorous:
1. Systematic review with meta-analysis
2. Systematic review without meta-analysis
3. Integrative review
4. Narrative review
Correct Answer: 1, 2, 3, 4
Expert Rationale:
Research evidence reviews differ in methodological rigor based on how systematically evidence
is collected, analyzed, and synthesized. A systematic review with meta-analysis is considered the
most rigorous because it not only systematically evaluates studies but also statistically combines
data from multiple studies to produce stronger evidence and more precise conclusions. A
systematic review without meta-analysis still follows strict methodological standards but does
not statistically pool results. An integrative review includes diverse methodologies and provides
broader understanding, although it is generally less rigorous due to variability in included
evidence. A narrative review is the least rigorous because it is often based on a non-systematic
selection of literature and may be influenced by author bias. Understanding the hierarchy of
evidence is essential in evidence-based nursing practice to support safe and effective clinical
decision-making.
DIF: Application
REF: Evidence-Based Practice / Levels of Evidence
OBJ: Differentiate levels of rigor among research evidence reviews
TOP: Nursing Research / Nursing Process Step: Analysis
Randomized controlled trials are which type of research?
Correct Answer: A. Quantitative research
Expert Rationale:
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are a form of quantitative research because they involve the
collection and analysis of numerical data to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions or
treatments. In an RCT, participants are randomly assigned to experimental or control groups,
which helps minimize bias and improves the reliability and validity of findings. Quantitative
research focuses on measurable outcomes, statistical analysis, and objective data collection.
RCTs are considered one of the strongest forms of evidence in healthcare research because they
establish cause-and-effect relationships between interventions and outcomes. Qualitative
research, in contrast, focuses on experiences, perceptions, and meanings rather than numerical
measurement.
DIF: Knowledge
REF: Nursing Research / Quantitative Research
, OBJ: Identify characteristics of randomized controlled trials
TOP: Evidence-Based Practice / Nursing Process Step: Evaluation
Which of the following types of research can be categorized as primary research? Select all
that apply.
Correct Answers:
A. Cohort study
C. Grounded theory study
D. Randomized controlled trial
F. Controlled trial without randomization
Expert Rationale:
Primary research involves the direct collection and analysis of original data by researchers to
answer a specific research question. Cohort studies, grounded theory studies, randomized
controlled trials, and controlled trials without randomization all generate new data from
participants or observations and are therefore considered primary research. Cohort studies
examine relationships between exposures and outcomes over time, grounded theory studies
develop theories based on participant experiences, and experimental studies such as randomized
controlled trials evaluate the effectiveness of interventions. These differ from secondary research
sources, which analyze or summarize findings from previously published studies.
DIF: Application
REF: Research Methodology / Primary Research
OBJ: Identify types of primary research studies
TOP: Nursing Research / Research Design
Which of the following statements is true of narrative reviews? (Select all that apply.)
Correct Answers:
B. Narrative reviews provide a general background discussion of a particular issue.
D. Narrative reviews generally review literature that support the author's point of view on
an issue or topic.
Expert Rationale:
Narrative reviews provide a broad and descriptive overview of a topic and are often used to
summarize general knowledge, discuss theories, or present background information. Unlike
systematic reviews, narrative reviews do not typically follow a rigorous or standardized search
methodology. The literature selected may reflect the author’s perspective or focus, which can
introduce selection bias. While narrative reviews are useful for understanding general concepts
and context, they are generally considered lower levels of evidence compared to systematic
reviews and meta-analyses because they lack strict methodological controls.
DIF: Knowledge
REF: Evidence-Based Practice / Narrative Reviews
ACTUAL EXAM WITH COMPLETE QUESTIONS
AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS (100%
VERIFIED ANSWERS) |ALREADY GRADED A+|
||PROFESSOR VERIFIED||
||BRANDNEW!!!||2026//2027!!!!!!
Mixed-methods studies are a combination of which two methodologies?
Correct Answer: B. Quantitative and qualitative research methodologies
Expert Rationale:
Mixed-methods research combines both quantitative and qualitative methodologies within a
single study to provide a more comprehensive understanding of a research problem. Quantitative
research focuses on numerical data, statistical analysis, measurement, and objective outcomes,
while qualitative research explores experiences, perceptions, meanings, and behaviors through
narrative data. By integrating both approaches, researchers are able to strengthen the validity of
findings, capture complex healthcare phenomena, and gain both statistical and contextual
insights that may not be achieved through a single methodology alone.
DIF: Knowledge
REF: Research Methodology / Mixed-Methods Research
OBJ: Identify characteristics of mixed-methods research
TOP: Nursing Research / Evidence-Based Practice
Both literature reviews and systematic reviews are types of research evidence reviews.
Correct Answer: True
Expert Rationale:
Literature reviews and systematic reviews are both considered forms of research evidence
reviews because they evaluate and summarize existing scholarly evidence on a particular topic.
A literature review provides a broad overview and synthesis of available research, often
identifying trends, theories, or gaps in knowledge. In contrast, a systematic review follows a
highly structured and rigorous methodology to identify, appraise, and synthesize all relevant
studies addressing a specific clinical or research question. Both review types support evidence-
based practice by helping healthcare professionals make informed decisions based on current
scientific evidence.
DIF: Knowledge
REF: Evidence-Based Practice / Research Reviews
,OBJ: Differentiate types of evidence reviews
TOP: Nursing Research / Evidence Synthesis
What type of information would help you identify a research study as qualitative? (Select
all that apply.)
Correct Answers:
A. Data is collected using such approaches as interviews, focus groups, and open-ended
questions on surveys.
D. Results are reported using themes and words.
Expert Rationale:
Qualitative research is designed to explore human experiences, perceptions, beliefs, and social
interactions in depth. This type of research commonly uses data collection methods such as
interviews, focus groups, observations, and open-ended survey questions to gather rich
descriptive information from participants. Findings are typically analyzed for patterns and
presented as themes, narratives, or categories rather than numerical statistics. These
characteristics distinguish qualitative studies from quantitative research, which relies primarily
on measurable variables, numerical data, and statistical analysis.
DIF: Application
REF: Qualitative Research Methodology
OBJ: Recognize characteristics of qualitative research
TOP: Nursing Research / Research Design
When trying to determine what type of research study is described in an article, which two
sections of the article will give you the best information to make that determination?
Correct Answer: C. Methods and results
Expert Rationale:
The methods and results sections of a research article provide the clearest and most reliable
information for identifying the type of research study conducted. The methods section explains
how the study was designed, including the sample selection, research design, data collection
procedures, and statistical analyses used. This information allows the reader to determine
whether the study is qualitative, quantitative, experimental, descriptive, correlational, or another
research type. The results section complements this by presenting the findings and type of data
generated from the study. Together, these sections provide sufficient evidence to accurately
classify the research design. Other sections, such as the introduction or discussion, may provide
background information or interpretation but are less reliable for identifying the actual study
methodology.
DIF: Application
REF: Nursing Research / Research Design
OBJ: Identify components used to determine research study design
TOP: Evidence-Based Practice / Nursing Process Step: Assessment
,Order the following types of research evidence reviews in order of rigor from most
rigorous to least rigorous:
1. Systematic review with meta-analysis
2. Systematic review without meta-analysis
3. Integrative review
4. Narrative review
Correct Answer: 1, 2, 3, 4
Expert Rationale:
Research evidence reviews differ in methodological rigor based on how systematically evidence
is collected, analyzed, and synthesized. A systematic review with meta-analysis is considered the
most rigorous because it not only systematically evaluates studies but also statistically combines
data from multiple studies to produce stronger evidence and more precise conclusions. A
systematic review without meta-analysis still follows strict methodological standards but does
not statistically pool results. An integrative review includes diverse methodologies and provides
broader understanding, although it is generally less rigorous due to variability in included
evidence. A narrative review is the least rigorous because it is often based on a non-systematic
selection of literature and may be influenced by author bias. Understanding the hierarchy of
evidence is essential in evidence-based nursing practice to support safe and effective clinical
decision-making.
DIF: Application
REF: Evidence-Based Practice / Levels of Evidence
OBJ: Differentiate levels of rigor among research evidence reviews
TOP: Nursing Research / Nursing Process Step: Analysis
Randomized controlled trials are which type of research?
Correct Answer: A. Quantitative research
Expert Rationale:
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are a form of quantitative research because they involve the
collection and analysis of numerical data to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions or
treatments. In an RCT, participants are randomly assigned to experimental or control groups,
which helps minimize bias and improves the reliability and validity of findings. Quantitative
research focuses on measurable outcomes, statistical analysis, and objective data collection.
RCTs are considered one of the strongest forms of evidence in healthcare research because they
establish cause-and-effect relationships between interventions and outcomes. Qualitative
research, in contrast, focuses on experiences, perceptions, and meanings rather than numerical
measurement.
DIF: Knowledge
REF: Nursing Research / Quantitative Research
, OBJ: Identify characteristics of randomized controlled trials
TOP: Evidence-Based Practice / Nursing Process Step: Evaluation
Which of the following types of research can be categorized as primary research? Select all
that apply.
Correct Answers:
A. Cohort study
C. Grounded theory study
D. Randomized controlled trial
F. Controlled trial without randomization
Expert Rationale:
Primary research involves the direct collection and analysis of original data by researchers to
answer a specific research question. Cohort studies, grounded theory studies, randomized
controlled trials, and controlled trials without randomization all generate new data from
participants or observations and are therefore considered primary research. Cohort studies
examine relationships between exposures and outcomes over time, grounded theory studies
develop theories based on participant experiences, and experimental studies such as randomized
controlled trials evaluate the effectiveness of interventions. These differ from secondary research
sources, which analyze or summarize findings from previously published studies.
DIF: Application
REF: Research Methodology / Primary Research
OBJ: Identify types of primary research studies
TOP: Nursing Research / Research Design
Which of the following statements is true of narrative reviews? (Select all that apply.)
Correct Answers:
B. Narrative reviews provide a general background discussion of a particular issue.
D. Narrative reviews generally review literature that support the author's point of view on
an issue or topic.
Expert Rationale:
Narrative reviews provide a broad and descriptive overview of a topic and are often used to
summarize general knowledge, discuss theories, or present background information. Unlike
systematic reviews, narrative reviews do not typically follow a rigorous or standardized search
methodology. The literature selected may reflect the author’s perspective or focus, which can
introduce selection bias. While narrative reviews are useful for understanding general concepts
and context, they are generally considered lower levels of evidence compared to systematic
reviews and meta-analyses because they lack strict methodological controls.
DIF: Knowledge
REF: Evidence-Based Practice / Narrative Reviews
