Cognitive Approach
Andrade Baron-Cohen et al Pozzolu et al.
(doodling) (Eyes test) (Line ups)
• Lab experiment • Lab experiment • Lab experiment
Key terms: Key terms: Key terms:
• Primary Task • Theory of Mind • False positive response
• Attention Reading the mind in the yese task, vs revised Target Present
• Divided attention version (table 3.3) Target absent
• Daydreaming Ceiling effect Social Factors* 3 factors
Basic and complex emotions Rejection and Identification
• Aims foil
• Does doodling help in Pilot Study • Sample size: 59 children, ages: 4-7 , 21F & 38M
performance/concentration 53 adults (17-30) age: 20.54
grouping mentioned in pa106, table 3.4 • Sampling Technique: Volunteer Sampling,
• Sample seiz: 40 • Sample size: Repeated design
Sample ages: 18-55 – sampling Technique: G1: 15 adult males. ASD/HFA. IQ: 115, age: 29 • Ivs: 3
Volunteer Sample G2: ‘normal’ adult group, IQ: average, age: 46.5
Independent Measures design. G3: student comparison group, age: 20.8
2 roups: experimental group and control group G4: IQ matched group 116 as Group1. age: 28 • Issues and debates: Application to everyday life
• Volunteer sampling Individual and Situational Explanation
• Issues and Debates: Application to everyday life Nature Vs Nurture
• Individual differences
Andrade Baron-Cohen et al Pozzolu et al.
(doodling) (Eyes test) (Line ups)
• Lab experiment • Lab experiment • Lab experiment
Key terms: Key terms: Key terms:
• Primary Task • Theory of Mind • False positive response
• Attention Reading the mind in the yese task, vs revised Target Present
• Divided attention version (table 3.3) Target absent
• Daydreaming Ceiling effect Social Factors* 3 factors
Basic and complex emotions Rejection and Identification
• Aims foil
• Does doodling help in Pilot Study • Sample size: 59 children, ages: 4-7 , 21F & 38M
performance/concentration 53 adults (17-30) age: 20.54
grouping mentioned in pa106, table 3.4 • Sampling Technique: Volunteer Sampling,
• Sample seiz: 40 • Sample size: Repeated design
Sample ages: 18-55 – sampling Technique: G1: 15 adult males. ASD/HFA. IQ: 115, age: 29 • Ivs: 3
Volunteer Sample G2: ‘normal’ adult group, IQ: average, age: 46.5
Independent Measures design. G3: student comparison group, age: 20.8
2 roups: experimental group and control group G4: IQ matched group 116 as Group1. age: 28 • Issues and debates: Application to everyday life
• Volunteer sampling Individual and Situational Explanation
• Issues and Debates: Application to everyday life Nature Vs Nurture
• Individual differences
