Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 17 pages
Exam (elaborations)

CMY3705 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2026 - DUE 7 April

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 17 pages

CMY3705 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2026 - DUE 7 April

Content preview

CMY3705 Assignment
1 (COMPLETE
ANSWERS) Semester
1 2026 - DUE 7 April
[Pick the date]
[Type the company name]

,Exam (elaborations)

CMY3705 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE
ANSWERS) Semester 1 2026 - DUE 7 April
Research Focus: How does the emotional readiness of victims affect the
quality and effectiveness of victim impact statements in South African
sentencing processes? Your discussion must include • Victim impact and
harm • Victims’ needs and rights in practice • Secondary victimisation •
Victim participation beyond sentencing • Victim’s agency and meaning
making The effective use of VIS depends on clear guidance, consistent
support for victims, and trauma-informed practice, because poorly managed
processes can intensify distress through repeated retelling, insensitive
engagement, delays, and weak communication. A coherent analysis of victim
impact statement (VIS) also requires attention to victim involvement beyond
sentencing, including the practical realities of post-sentencing participation
such as parole-related processes, where inconsistent notification and limited
preparation can undermine meaningful participation and contribute to
secondary victimisation through the very institutions expected to provide
justice and protection. Victim impact and harm • Victims’ needs and rights in
practice • Secondary victimisation • Victim participation beyond sentencing
• Victim’s agency and meaning-makingHow are victim impact statements
(VIS) implemented in South African sentencing processes, and to what extent
do current practices enable victims and families to communicate the full
impact of crime in a manner that meaningfully informs sentencing outcomes
1.1 Research Focus: How do power imbalances between victims and legal
professionals affect the use and impact of victim impact statements in South
African courts? Your discussion must include • Victim impact and harm •
Victims’ needs and rights in practice • Secondary victimisation • Victim
participation beyond sentencing • Victim’s agency and meaning making
Research Focus: To what extent do language barriers influence the ability of
victims to present meaningful victim impact statements in South Africa? Your
discussion must include • Victim impact and harm • Victims’ needs and
rights in practice • Secondary victimisation • Victim participation beyond
sentencing • Victim’s agency and meaning making Research Focus: How
does the emotional readiness of victims affect the quality and effectiveness
of victim impact statements in South African sentencing processes? Your
discussion must include • Victim impact and harm • Victims’ needs and
rights in practice • Secondary victimisation • Victim participation beyond
sentencing • Victim’s agency and meaning making 4.1 Research Focus: To
what extent does the timing of victim impact statement submission affect its
influence on sentencing decisions in South Africa? 4.2 Your discussion must
include • Victim impact and harm • Victims’ needs and rights in practice •
Secondary victimisation • Victim participation beyond sentencing • Victim’s

, agency and meaning making 5.1 Research Focus: How do differences in
urban and rural justice systems affect the use of victim impact statements in
South Africa? 5.2 Your discussion must include • Victim impact and harm •
Victims’ needs and rights in practice • Secondary victimisation • Victim
participation beyond sentencing • Victim’s agency and meaning making 6.1
Research Focus: To what extent do victims understand the purpose and
value of victim impact statements in the South African legal system? 6.2
Your discussion must include • Victim impact and harm • Victims’ needs and
rights in practice • Secondary victimisation • Victim participation beyond
sentencing • Victim’s agency and meaning making 7.1 Research Focus: How
does repeated exposure to the justice process affect victims’ willingness to
participate in victim impact statements in South Africa? 7.2 Your discussion
must include • Victim impact and harm • Victims’ needs and rights in
practice • Secondary victimisation • Victim participation beyond sentencing
• Victim’s agency and meaning making 8.1 Research Focus: To what extent
do victim support services improve the accuracy and depth of victim impact
statements in South Africa? 8.2 Your discussion must include • Victim impact
and harm • Victims’ needs and rights in practice • Secondary victimisation •
Victim participation beyond sentencing • Victim’s agency and meaning
making 9.1 Research Focus: How do gender based experiences shape the
content and impact of victim impact statements in South African courts? 9.2
Your discussion must include • Victim impact and harm • Victims’ needs and
rights in practice • Secondary victimisation • Victim participation beyond
sentencing • Victim’s agency and meaning making 10.1 Research Focus: To
what extent do victim impact statements promote accountability and
responsibility in offenders during sentencing in South Africa? 10.2 Your
discussion must include • Victim impact and harm • Victims’ needs and
rights in practice • Secondary victimisation • Victim participation beyond
sentencing • Victim’s agency and meaning making

This comprehensive analysis addresses the integration of Victim Impact Statements (VIS)
within the South African criminal justice system. While the VIS is designed to give victims a
"voice" during sentencing, its effectiveness is often compromised by systemic, emotional, and
procedural barriers.




1. Victim Impact and Harm
Victim impact refers to the multifaceted consequences of crime, encompassing physical,
financial, psychological, and social trauma.

 The Role of VIS: In South African courts, the VIS serves as a bridge between the
clinical facts of a case and the lived reality of the victim. It allows the court to move
beyond a "crime against the state" to a "harm against a person."

Connected book
 image
Leah E. Daigle, Dr. Lisa R. Muftic Victimology
Publisher: april 2015 ISBN: 9781483391229 Edition: Unknown

Document information

Uploaded on
April 3, 2026
Number of pages
17
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$3.00

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
ivymwendwa47820
3.6
(74)
Sold
367
Followers
156
Items
932
Last sold
1 week ago


Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions