LPL4802
Assignment 4 Semester 1 2026
Detailed Solutions, References & Explanations
Unique number: 272870
Due Date: 24 April 2026
Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
Fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without
any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as a result of
reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for comparison, research
and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any
form or by any means.
, +27 67 171 1739
Question 1
Not yet answered
Marked out of 1.00
Flag question
Question text
What principle was articulated by the court in Administrator, Natal v Edouard 1990 (3) SA
581 (A) state?
1.
The court appeared to favour a total rejection of punitive damages in private and constitutional
matters.
2.
The court held that physical inconvenience caused by a breach of contract is actionable.
3.
The court stated that in our law a damages award does not serve to punish for the act of
defamation. It aims to serve as compensation, vindicating the victim’s dignity, reputation and
integrity.
4.
The court held that a claim for compensation for pain and suffering cannot merely be based on
breach of contract and, furthermore, there is no common-law authority which generally allows
damages for any non-patrimonial loss caused by a breach of contract.
Clear my choice
Question 2
Not yet answered
Marked out of 1.00
Flag question
Question text
Funeral expenses arising from the death of a person...
1.
are claimable in as far as they are proven to be reasonable.
2.
are claimable if they are necessary and actual costs of burial or cremation.
3.
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without
any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as a result of
reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for comparison, research
and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any
form or by any means.
Assignment 4 Semester 1 2026
Detailed Solutions, References & Explanations
Unique number: 272870
Due Date: 24 April 2026
Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
Fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without
any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as a result of
reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for comparison, research
and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any
form or by any means.
, +27 67 171 1739
Question 1
Not yet answered
Marked out of 1.00
Flag question
Question text
What principle was articulated by the court in Administrator, Natal v Edouard 1990 (3) SA
581 (A) state?
1.
The court appeared to favour a total rejection of punitive damages in private and constitutional
matters.
2.
The court held that physical inconvenience caused by a breach of contract is actionable.
3.
The court stated that in our law a damages award does not serve to punish for the act of
defamation. It aims to serve as compensation, vindicating the victim’s dignity, reputation and
integrity.
4.
The court held that a claim for compensation for pain and suffering cannot merely be based on
breach of contract and, furthermore, there is no common-law authority which generally allows
damages for any non-patrimonial loss caused by a breach of contract.
Clear my choice
Question 2
Not yet answered
Marked out of 1.00
Flag question
Question text
Funeral expenses arising from the death of a person...
1.
are claimable in as far as they are proven to be reasonable.
2.
are claimable if they are necessary and actual costs of burial or cremation.
3.
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without
any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as a result of
reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for comparison, research
and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any
form or by any means.
