100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary 2.8 Problem 6

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
8
Uploaded on
21-04-2021
Written in
2019/2020

Summary of 8 pages for the course Organisational Psychology at EUR (2.8 Problem 6)

Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
April 21, 2021
Number of pages
8
Written in
2019/2020
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Problem 6

Judge & Cable – the effect of physical height on workplace success and income

- societal impression that taller people are more successful
- evolutionary origins: animals use height as an index for power and strength and
demands more respect
- psychological importance on people’s dispositions, personalities and behaviors
- Napoleon’s complex: being short makes people feel inadequate, leading to
inferiority complex and overaggressive behavior
- previous research suggests a positive relationship between height and performance
& leader effectiveness

3 aims of this study:
- address a process model of the height-career success relationship
- a meta-analysis to test the implications of the model
- 4 new investigations of height and personal incomes

Theoretical model of physical height and career success
- career success as an outcome of work measured by earnings and leadership positions
- height affect career through mediating factors  self-esteem and social esteem
- these affect job performance as well as supervisor evaluations which in turn affects
career success




Height  Social Esteem
- social esteem: how positively one is evaluated or regarded by others in society
- evolutionary aspect - interpret height as power
- perceptual bias: people perceive more valuable things as larger, and less valuable
things smaller
- social norms: height is a metaphor for importance and power, heuristic for
dominance
- people are more likely to be persuaded by tall people
- “big man”, “looking up to someone”

Height  self-esteem
- short people might be dissatisfied with their physical stature and these insecurities
reflect to their personalities
- people tend to take on the attributes that society ascribes them

1

, - tall people have greater self-worth and self-confidence because they are viewed and
treated with more respect by others
- height is positively associated with external locus of control and emotional reactivity
- short people score higher on inferiority and depression

Social esteem  performance
- 2 types of job performance:
o objective: job or task outcomes and results
 esteem leads to objective performance in socially interactive positive
 self-fulfilling prophecy: esteemed people are more able to deliver job
results that make them even more esteemed
o subjective: how others evaluate performance such as managers
 esteem affects job results so naturally affects manager appraisals
 regardless of actual performance, height lead to biased hypothesis
testing (initial beliefs about employees) and a self-fulfilling process

Self-esteem  performance
- self-esteem mediates the link between height and performance
- even when controlled for productivity, people with higher self-esteem have higher
performance ratings bc self-positive people are viewed more favorably

Performance  career success
- high productivity is desired
- companies can give rewards based on both objective (what’s accomplished) and
subjective (how it was accomplished) results

Hypotheses:
- 1) Height is positively related to leadership and earnings.
- 2) Height shows a simplex relationship with status, performance and career
o height is most strongly related to status and least strongly related to career
success
- 3) Height is more strongly related to subjective outcomes than objective outcomes

Meta-analysis results:
- 71 articles
- Positive correlation of height with career success (p=0.26) and earnings (p=0.31)
- Career success higher for men p=0.29 than for women p=0.21 (not a significant
difference)
- All 3 hypotheses were supported
- Controlled variables:
o Gender: women get payed less, gender negatively predicts earnings
o Age: age and height positively predict earnings
o Weight: weight negatively predicts earnings
o Intelligence: they speculated that height and intelligence are positively
related, but controlling for intelligence doesn’t affect the relationship of
height and earnings and intelligence is not a mediator
o Time: validity of height in predicting earning doesn’t decline over time

2
$5.39
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
ebru1365 Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
131
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
83
Documents
145
Last sold
1 year ago

4.3

37 reviews

5
24
4
5
3
5
2
1
1
2

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions