Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

A LEVEL BIOLOGY A: Actual June 2025 MARK SCHEME PAPER 2: Biological Diversity [OCR 11420/021

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
74
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
11-03-2026
Written in
2025/2026

A LEVEL BIOLOGY A: Actual June 2025 MARK SCHEME PAPER 2: Biological Diversity [OCR 11420/021 Exam Resource Summary The A Level Biology A June 2025 Biological Diversity Mark Scheme (OCR H420/02) provides the official, detailed marking guidance used by examiners to assess student performance on the Biological Diversity paper. This document outlines the precise criteria for awarding marks, including required scientific terminology, key points for full-credit explanations, data-analysis expectations, and the structure of high-band responses across all question types. By clearly defining acceptable answers, common misconceptions, and how marks are allocated, the mark scheme enables students to understand examiner expectations and refine their exam technique. This resource is an essential companion for targeted revision, helping learners evaluate their own practice responses, strengthen biological reasoning, and build the accuracy and detail needed for success in the May/June 2026 OCR A Level Biology A Biological Diversity examination.

Show more Read less
Institution
A LEVEL BIOLOGY A: Actual June 2025
Course
A LEVEL BIOLOGY A: Actual June 2025

Content preview

Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations

,OCR (Oxford Cambridge and RSA) is a leading UK awarding body, providing a wide range of qualifications
to meet the needs of candidates of all ages and abilities. OCR qualifications include AS/A Levels,
Diplomas, GCSEs, Cambridge Nationals, Cambridge Technicals, Functional Skills, Key Skills, Entry Level
qualifications, NVQs and vocational qualifications in areas such as IT, business, languages,
teaching/training, administration and secretarial skills.

It is also responsible for developing new specifications to meet national requirements and the needs of
students and teachers. OCR is a not-for-profit organisation; any surplus made is invested back into the
establishment to help towards the development of qualifications and support, which keep pace with the
changing needs of today’s society.

This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and students, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which marks were awarded by examiners. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions which took place at an examiners’ meeting before marking commenced.

All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in candidates’
scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills demonstrated.

Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the published question papers and the report on the
examination.


© OCR 2025




Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations

,H420/02 Mark Scheme June 2025
MARKING INSTRUCTIONS
PREPARATION FOR MARKING RM
ASSESSOR
1. Make sure that you have accessed and completed the relevant training packages for on-screen marking: RM Assessor Online Training: OCR Essential Guide
to Marking.

2. Make sure that you have read and understood the mark scheme and the question paper for this unit. These are available in RM Assessor



3. Log-in to RM Assessor and mark the required number of practice responses (“scripts”) and the required number of standardisation responses.


MARKING
1. Mark strictly to the mark scheme.

2. Marks awarded must relate directly to the marking criteria.

3. The schedule of dates is very important. It is essential that you meet the RM Assessor 50% and 100% (traditional 40% Batch 1 and 100% Batch 2) deadlines. If
you experience problems, you must contact your Team Leader (Supervisor) without delay.

4. If you are in any doubt about applying the mark scheme, consult your Team Leader by telephone, email or via the RM Assessor messaging system.

5. Crossed-Out Responses
Where a candidate has crossed out a response and provided a clear alternative then the crossed-out response is not marked. Where no alternative response has
been provided, examiners may give candidates the benefit of the doubt and mark the crossed-out response where legible.

Rubric Error Responses – Optional Questions
Where candidates have a choice of question across a whole paper or a whole section and have provided more answers than required, then all responses are marked
and the highest mark allowable within the rubric is given. Enter a mark for each question answered into RM Assessor, which will select the highest mark from those
awarded. (The underlying assumption is that the candidate has penalised themselves by attempting more questions than necessary in the time allowed.)


2

, H420/02 Mark Scheme June 2025
Multiple-Choice Question Responses
When a multiple-choice question has only a single, correct response and a candidate provides two responses (even if one of these responses is correct), then no mark
should be awarded (as it is not possible to determine which was the first response selected by the candidate).
When a question requires candidates to select more than one option/multiple options, then local marking arrangements need to ensure consistency of approach.

Contradictory Responses
When a candidate provides contradictory responses, then no mark should be awarded, even if one of the answers is correct.

Short Answer Questions (requiring only a list by way of a response, usually worth only one mark per response)
Where candidates are required to provide a set number of short answer responses then only the set number of responses should be marked. The response space
should be marked from left to right on each line and then line by line until the required number of responses have been considered. The remaining responses should
not then be marked. Examiners will have to apply judgement as to whether a ‘second response’ on a line is a development of the ‘first response’, rather than a
separate, discrete response. (The underlying assumption is that the candidate is attempting to hedge their bets and therefore getting undue benefit rather than
engaging with the question and giving the most relevant/correct responses.)

Short Answer Questions (requiring a more developed response, worth two or more marks)
If the candidates are required to provide a description of, say, three items or factors and four items or factors are provided, then mark on a similar basis – that is
downwards (as it is unlikely in this situation that a candidate will provide more than one response in each section of the response space).

Longer Answer Questions (requiring a developed response)
Where candidates have provided two (or more) responses to a medium or high tariff question which only required a single (developed) response and not crossed
out the first response, then only the first response should be marked. Examiners will need to apply professional judgement as to whether the second (or a
subsequent) response is a ‘new start’ or simply a poorly expressed continuation of the first response.

6. Always check the pages (and additional objects if present) at the end of the response in case any answers have been continued there. If the candidate has
continued an answer there, then add the annotation ‘SEEN’ to confirm that the work has been seen and mark any responses using the annotations in section 11.




3

Written for

Institution
A LEVEL BIOLOGY A: Actual June 2025
Course
A LEVEL BIOLOGY A: Actual June 2025

Document information

Uploaded on
March 11, 2026
Number of pages
74
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$9.99
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Cate001 Walden university
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
179
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
78
Documents
1887
Last sold
3 weeks ago

4.9

419 reviews

5
398
4
12
3
5
2
1
1
3

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions