Test Bank For Kaplan & Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry 12th Edition By Robert Boland; Marica Verdiun; Pedro Ruiz 9781975145569 Chapter 1-35 Complete Guide .

Kaplan & Sadock Synopsis of Psychia I I I I I m!




try Updated 12th Edition_test_bank 2
I I I I m!




023 GRADED A+ I I




KaplanI&ISadock'sISynopsisIofIPsychiatryIEditionI12 Test Bank m! m
!




ChapterI 1. Examination and DiagnosisI ofI theI PsychiatricIP
m! m! m! m! m! m! m!


at ientIMultiple Choice
m! m!

IdentifyIthe choice that best completesItheI statementIorIanswersItheI question.
m! m! m! m!




1. AInurseIisIassessingIaI clientIwhoIisIexperiencing occasional feeli m! m!


ngs ofIsadnessI becauseIofItheI recentIdeath ofIaIbelovedIpet.ITheIclient’s appetite,sleepI p
m! m! m! m!


a tterns,I and dailyI routineI have not changed. HowI shouldI the nurse interpret the client’
m! m! m! m! m! m! m! m! m!


sIb ehaviors?
m!




1. The client’s behaviors demonstrateI
m! m! m!


mental illness in theIform ofIdepre
m! m! m! m! m!


ss ion.
m!




2. TheIclient’sIbehaviorsIareIextensive,Iwh
ichI indicatesItheI presenceIofImentalIill
m! m!


ne ss. m!




3. The client’s behaviors are notIcongruen
m! m! m! m!


t with cultural norms.
m! m! m!




4. The client’s behaviors demonstrate noI
m! m! m! m!


f unctional impairment, indicatingIno
m! m! m! m!


m ental illness.
m! m!

, 2. At what point should the nurse determine that a client isIat riskf
m! m! m! m! m! m! m! m! m! m! m!


or developing a mental illness?
m! m! m! m!




1. When thoughts, feelings, and behaviors
m! m! m! m!


are not reflective of the DSM-5 criteria.
m
! m! m! m! m! m! m!




2. When maladaptive responsesIto stressIa
m! m! m!


reIcoupledIwithIinterferenceIinIdailyIfu
m!


n ctioning.
m!




3. WhenI aI clientIcommunicatesIs
ignificantI distress.
m!




4. WhenIaI client usesI defenseI mechanismsIa
m!


sIegoIprotection.
m!




3. A nurse isIassessingIaI setIofI15-year-
m! m!


old identicalItwins whorespond veryIdifferentlyItoI stress.I OneItwinI becomesIanxiousI a
m! m! m!


ndIirritable,IandI theIother withdrawsIandIcries.IHowIshouldItheInurseIexplain these di
m! m! m! m!


ff erentIstress responsesItoIthe parents?
m! m! m!




1. ReactionsItoIstressIare relativeIratherIth m!


anI absolute;Iindividual responsesItoIst
m! m!


r essIvary.
m!




2. ItIisIabnormalIforIidentical twinsItoIre m!


actI differentlyItoIsimilar stressors.
m! m!

, 3. Identical twins should share the same t
m! m! m! m! m! m!


emperamentIand respond similarly to s
m
! m! m! m! m!


tr ess.
m!




4. Environmental influences toI stress m! m!


weigh more heavily than genetic
m! m! m! m! m! m!


influences.
m
!




1. ReactionsItoIstressIareIrelativeIratherIth
anI absolute;IindividualI responsesItoIst
m!


r essIvary.
m!




2. ItIisIabnormal for identicalItwinsItoIrem! m!


actI differently toIsimilarIstressors.
m! m!




3. IdenticalItwinsIshouldIshareItheIsameIte
mperamentIandIrespondIsimilarlyItoIst
m!


r ess.
m!




4. EnvironmentalI influences toI stressI m!


weighI moreIheavily than geneticIi
m! m! m!


n fluences.
m!




4. Which clientI shouldItheI nurseI anticipateItoIbeI mostre
m!


m! ceptiveIto psychiatric treatment?
m! m!




1. AIJewish,Ifemale social worker. m! m!




2. AIBaptist, homeless male. m! m!




3. AICatholic, black male. m! m!




4. AIProtestant, SwedishIbusinessIexecutive.
m!




5. AIpsychiatricInurse intern states,I “ThisIclient’sI use ofIdefensem
m! m! I m! m!


echanismsIshouldIbeIeliminated.”IWhichIisIaIcorrect evaluationIofIthis nurse’sIstatement
m! m!


?
1. Defense mechanisms can beIappro
m! m! m!


p riate responsesIto stress andneed
m! m! m! m! m!


no t be m! m!


eliminated.

, 2. Defense mechanisms are a maladapti
m! m! m! m!


ve attempt of the ego to manage anxie
m
! m! m! m! m! m! m! m!


tyand should always beeliminated.
m
! m! m! m!




3. Defense mechanisms, used by indiv
m! m! m! m!


iduals withIweakIegoIintegrity,shoul
m
! m!


d be
m!


discouragedIandI notI eliminated.