1
WEEK 3 FULL DISCUSSION BOARD CASE STUDIES 2026
LATEST VERSIONS
NR525_W3_Case_Study_Discussion_Rubric
(https://lms.courselearn.net/lms/content/1500/50348/NR525/NR525_W3_Case_Study_Discussion_Rubric_8_17_V2.docx)
Part I of the case study opens on Sunday and will close on Wednesday of the week. You cannot add additional information to
Part I once it closes on Wednesday.
In this part of the case study you are to identify a minimum of 2 key questions for the student and 2 key questions for the faculty
member that are relevant to the grievance. A rationale for each question is to be provided. A scholarly article supporting this part of
the discussion is to be included in the initial post.
Part II will open on Wednesday of the week and close on Saturday of the week. You cannot add additional information to Part II
once it closes on Saturday.
In this part of the case study, you are to review a minimum of one skills policy and answer the questions identified in part two of the
case study. You are to provide the web address of the skills policy. Please note: Course/school policies are not the same as a skills
policy.
Part III will open on Thursday of the week and close on Sunday of the week.
In this part of the case study, you are to summarize three (3) key points in determining a decision in a grievance. You are to make a
clearly identified decision about this grievance.
There is to be a minimum of 5 total posts.
1/111
,2
Part one of the case study: Initial post and peer response
Part two of the case study: Initial post and peer response
2/111
,3
NR 525 Week 3 full discussion board Case Study Part I. 2021
Part three of the case study: Initial post
Part I: Failure of the Skills Exam
You are the chair of the grievance committee at ABC Community College. On Monday morning, you open your e-
mail and find a grievance form from Susie Student. Susie is a second-semester nursing student at the college. The
grievance form states that she has failed the Final Skills Exam on sterile technique. The Nursing Skills Policy states
that if a student fails any Skills Exam, the student fails the course. Susie is challenging the failure, stating that the
faculty member who observed and graded her performance used excessive personal interpretation of the skills and
its published guidelines.
As the chair of the grievance committee, it is your responsibility to separately interview the faculty member who
did the evaluation and Susie Student.
Questions for Part I:
Identify specific questions that you would ask Susie and the faculty member. Identify a minimum of two
relevant questions for Susie and two for the faculty member.
Why are these questions relevant to the decision of the grievance committee?
This topic was locked Mar 20 at 11:59pm.
Search entries or author Unread Subscribed
(https:/ Anna Hines
(https: /chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/40415/users/65203)
3/111
, 4
Mar 17, 2019
4/111
WEEK 3 FULL DISCUSSION BOARD CASE STUDIES 2026
LATEST VERSIONS
NR525_W3_Case_Study_Discussion_Rubric
(https://lms.courselearn.net/lms/content/1500/50348/NR525/NR525_W3_Case_Study_Discussion_Rubric_8_17_V2.docx)
Part I of the case study opens on Sunday and will close on Wednesday of the week. You cannot add additional information to
Part I once it closes on Wednesday.
In this part of the case study you are to identify a minimum of 2 key questions for the student and 2 key questions for the faculty
member that are relevant to the grievance. A rationale for each question is to be provided. A scholarly article supporting this part of
the discussion is to be included in the initial post.
Part II will open on Wednesday of the week and close on Saturday of the week. You cannot add additional information to Part II
once it closes on Saturday.
In this part of the case study, you are to review a minimum of one skills policy and answer the questions identified in part two of the
case study. You are to provide the web address of the skills policy. Please note: Course/school policies are not the same as a skills
policy.
Part III will open on Thursday of the week and close on Sunday of the week.
In this part of the case study, you are to summarize three (3) key points in determining a decision in a grievance. You are to make a
clearly identified decision about this grievance.
There is to be a minimum of 5 total posts.
1/111
,2
Part one of the case study: Initial post and peer response
Part two of the case study: Initial post and peer response
2/111
,3
NR 525 Week 3 full discussion board Case Study Part I. 2021
Part three of the case study: Initial post
Part I: Failure of the Skills Exam
You are the chair of the grievance committee at ABC Community College. On Monday morning, you open your e-
mail and find a grievance form from Susie Student. Susie is a second-semester nursing student at the college. The
grievance form states that she has failed the Final Skills Exam on sterile technique. The Nursing Skills Policy states
that if a student fails any Skills Exam, the student fails the course. Susie is challenging the failure, stating that the
faculty member who observed and graded her performance used excessive personal interpretation of the skills and
its published guidelines.
As the chair of the grievance committee, it is your responsibility to separately interview the faculty member who
did the evaluation and Susie Student.
Questions for Part I:
Identify specific questions that you would ask Susie and the faculty member. Identify a minimum of two
relevant questions for Susie and two for the faculty member.
Why are these questions relevant to the decision of the grievance committee?
This topic was locked Mar 20 at 11:59pm.
Search entries or author Unread Subscribed
(https:/ Anna Hines
(https: /chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/40415/users/65203)
3/111
, 4
Mar 17, 2019
4/111
