Entry-Level CBP Officer Logical Reasoning Test Exam
| Most Recent Exam 2026 Actual Complete Verified
Exam Questions With 100% Correct Answers| Verified
Answers | Already Graded A+ | Guaranteed Success!! |
Newest Exam!!!
Officer Smith is in charge of all of the canine teams in his
sector. Fifteen canine teams are stationed in his sector.
Most of the canine teams are located at stations along the
border. Several canine teams are located away from the
border in large urban areas. All of the teams must be
available to travel to any duty station within the sector.
From the information given above, it can be validly
concluded that, in Officer Smith's sector,
A) most of the canine teams are located away from the
border in large urban areas
B) only teams located along the border must be available
to travel to any duty station within
the sector
,2|Page
C) teams in urban areas do not need to be available to
travel to other duty stations within the
sector
D) none of the teams are exempt from traveling to any
duty location within the sector
E) few of the canine teams are located at stations along
the border - Answers-D) none of the teams are exempt
from traveling to any duty location within the sector
Some 480,000 immigrants were living in a certain country
in 1999. Although most of these immigrants were not
employed in professional occupations, many of them
were. For instance, many of them were engineers and
many of them were nurses. Very few of these immigrants
were librarians, another professional occupation.
From the information given above, it can validly concluded
that, in 1999, in the country described above:
A) Most immigrants were either engineers or nurses
,3|Page
B) It is not the case that some of the nurses were
immigrants
C) None of the engineers were immigrants
D) Some of the engineers were immigrants - Answers-D)
Some of the engineers were immigrants
A trucking company can act as a 'common carrier' - for
hire to the general public at published rates. As a common
carrier, the trucking company is liable for any cargo
damage, unless the company can show that it was not
negligent. If the company can demonstrate that it was not
negligent, then it is not liable for cargo damage. In
contrast, a 'contract carrier' ( a trucking company hired by
a shipper under a specific contract) is only responsible for
cargo damage spelled out in the contract. A Claus Inc.
tractor-trailer, acting under common carrier authority, was
in a 5-vehivle accident that damaged its cargo. A Nichlos
Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under contract carrier authority,
was involved in the same accident, and its cargo was also
damaged.
, 4|Page
From the information given above, it can be validly
concluded that, in reference to the accident:
A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not
negligent - Answers-C) If Claus Inc. can show that it was
not negligent, then it is not liable
A rapidly changing technical environment in government is
promoting greater reliance on electronic mail (e-mail)
systems. As this usage grows, there are increasing
chances of conflict between the users' expectations of
privacy and public access rights. In some investigation,
access to ALL e-mail, including those messages stored in
archival files and messages outside the scope of the
investigation, has been sought and granted. In spite of
this, some people send messages through e-mail that
would never be said face-to-face or written formally.
From the information given above, it CANNOT be validly
concluded that:
A) Some e-mails messages that have been requested as
part of investigations have contained messages that would
neve be said face-to-face