scheMe with verified Answers
1. what is the differential association theory - ANSWER an explanation for
offending which proposes that, through interaction with others, individuals
learn the values, attitudes, techniques and motives for criminal behaviour
2. what did Sutherland suggest about the origin of criminal behaviour for
differential association theory - ANSWER that offending behaviour may be
acquired through learning from interactions with significant others, so
criminality arises from learned pro-criminal attitudes and learning criminal
acts, and if a person is exposed to more pro-criminal than anti-criminal
attitudes they will go on to offend (and vice-versa for conformity)
3. what does differential association theory suggest about predicting criminal
behaviour - ANSWER that it should be possible to predict how likely an
individual is to commit crime if we know the frequency, intensity and
duration for which they have been exposed to deviant and non-deviant
norms and values
4. what did Sutherland suggest about reoffending rates for differential
association theory - ANSWER that inmates learn specific techniques for
offending from other more experienced criminals while in jail, which they
may be eager to put into practice upon release, which may explain high
reoffending rates (this learning may occur through observation, imitation or
direct tuition)
,5. what did Burgess later add to differential association theory - ANSWER
differential reinforcement, which suggests that operant conditioning applies
to criminal behaviour because criminals are often rewarded for their crimes,
either through congratulations from their peers, or gaining the stolen item
without paying for it
6. evaluate differential association theory - ANSWER accounts for crime in all
sectors of society, offers a more realistic solution for crime, but is
unfalsifiable and maybe reductionist
7. how does differential association theory account for crime in all sectors of
society - ANSWER it accounts for this and also recognises that some types
of crime are more common in working class communities and others in more
affluent groups, while Sunderland himself coined the term 'white-collar
crime' (corporate crime)
8. how does differential association theory offer a more realistic solution for
crime - ANSWER Sutherland was successful in moving the emphasis away
from earlier explanations for crime (e.g. Lombroso's atavistic form),
focusing on dysfunctional social circumstances or environments (instead of
dysfunctional people), so the theory is more desirable because it offers a
more realistic solution that others (e.g. eugenics)
9. how is differential association theory unfalsifiable - ANSWER the theory is
hard to test because it is difficult to measure factors such as how many pro-
or anti-criminal attitudes a person has been exposed to, making the theory
unfalsifiable and therefore unscientific and invalid
10.why may differential association theory be reductionist - ANSWER because
it ignores the potential influence of other factors such as genetics (Lange)
, and the family's response to crime (Mednick), so could be seen as
reductionist
11.what is the psychodynamic explanation for offending - ANSWER the
superego works on the morality principle and punishes the ego for
wrongdoing through guild, and rewards it for moral behaviour through pride,
so Blackburn suggested that an inadequate superego causes criminal
behaviour because the id is not properly controlled, and that there are 3 types
of inadequate superego
12.what did Blackburn suggest were the 3 types of inadequate superego -
ANSWER weak superego, deviant superego, and over-harsh superego
13.describe a weak superego (one type of inadequate superego) - ANSWER if
the same sex parent is absent during the phallic stage the child cannot
identify with them and internalise a fully formed superego which makes
immoral or criminal behaviour more likely
14.describe a deviant superego (one type of inadequate superego) - ANSWER
when the child internalises a superego with immoral or deviant values e.g.
because they had a criminal parent so do not associate guilt with wrongdoing
15.describe an overly-harsh superego (one type of inadequate superego) -
ANSWER the individual is cripples by guilt and anxiety which may
(unconsciously) drive the individual to perform criminal acts in order to
satisfy the superego's overwhelming need for punishment
16.what did Bowlby contribute to the psychodynamic explanation for criminal
behaviour - ANSWER Bowlby argues that failure to establish a strong
, maternal bond during the first few years of life means that the child will
experience consequences such as affectionless psychopathy in later life, and
is likely to be delinquent and unable to develop close relationships with
others (research support by juvenile thieves study)
17.evaluate the psychodynamic explanation for offending behaviour -
ANSWER applicable to a wide range of crimes, but suggests that women
should be more prone to criminal behaviour, is unfalsifiable, and other
explanations may be better
18.how is the psychodynamic explanation applicable to a wide range of crimes
- ANSWER it accounts for emotional factors such as poor relationships, and
can explain illogical crimes such as rich people shoplifting (because of a
harsh upbringing leading to an overly-harsh ego), so may be applicable to a
wider range of crimes than other theories
19.why does the psychodynamic explanation suggest that women should be
more prone to criminal behaviour - ANSWER Freud's theory implicitly
assumes that girls develop a weaker superego than boys because they have
not experienced castration anxiety, so women should be more prone to
criminal behaviour, but there are 20x more males than females in prison and
Hoffman found little gender difference in morality
20.how is the psychodynamic explanation for offending behaviour unfalsifiable
- ANSWER because it includes many unconscious concepts (e.g. the
superego), which are unfalsifiable (as they cannot be empirically tested) and
therefore unscientific
21.why may other explanations for criminal behaviour be better than the
psychodynamic explanation - ANSWER there is little evidence for