100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Class notes

concept based study notes of logical fallacies with clear explanations and real-life examples for LSAT logical reasoning and legal reasoning.

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
3
Uploaded on
11-01-2026
Written in
2025/2026

This document explains common logical fallacies that frequently appear in LSAT logical reasoning and other Law entrance exams. Each fallacy is clearly defined and explained through simple, real-life examples to help identify flawed arguments and weak reasoning patterns. The notes focus on understanding how arguments fail, which is essential for LSAT question types such as flaw in reasoning, weaken,strengthen, assumption, and method of reasoning questions.

Show more Read less
Institution
LSAT
Course
LSAT








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
LSAT
Course
LSAT

Document information

Uploaded on
January 11, 2026
Number of pages
3
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
Independent study
Contains
All classes

Content preview

LOGICAL FALLACIES
Logical fallacies: The logical fallacy involves arguments, in other words one or
more statements called the premise and conclusion. The premise is offered in
support of the claim being made, which is the conclusion.

10 Logical Fallacy we are going to discuss are following:

a. Ad Hominem fallacy
b. Straw man fallacy
c. Appeal to authority
d. False Cause (Post Hoe fallacy)
e. Hasty Generalization
f. False dilemma
g. Slippery Note Fallacy
h. Bandwagon Fallacy
i. Appeal to emotion
j. Red Herring


1. Ad Hominem: Ad Hominem fallacy attack an opponent’s position based on
personal traits or tact about the opponent rather than through logic.
Basically attacking the person making the argument instead of addressing
the argument which shifts the the focus from the actual logic or argument.
For Example: A professor rejected a student’s Legal research paper he was
not a Law student thus his view on Legal matters are invalid.

2. Straw Man Fallacy: The Straw Man Fallacy misrepresents or tries to
manipulate an opponent’s argument to make it easier to defeat and
dismiss. It often involves Distorting, exaggerating, oversimplifying, or taking
parts out of context.
For Example: A student suggests that they should add sign language in
curriculum as a subject but another student attacks saying “oh so you want
us to ignore all the main and important subject.
$12.99
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
sakshisingh19

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
sakshisingh19 YMCA University of Science and Technology
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
New on Stuvia
Member since
3 weeks
Number of followers
0
Documents
1
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions