Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 600 pages
Exam (elaborations)

Solution Manual for Contemporary Auditing 11th Edition by C. Knapp | Case Solutions, Answer Key & Instructor Guides

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 600 pages

Unlock the full potential of your auditing coursework with the complete Solution Manual for Contemporary Auditing, 11th Edition by C. Knapp. This essential resource provides detailed, step-by-step answers to all case questions and chapter exercises, saving you hours of study time and boosting your comprehension. What’s Inside: Detailed Case Solutions for real-world auditing failures like Enron, Lehman Brothers, Just for Feet, Health Management, Leslie Fay, Le-Nature’s, Navistar, ZZZZ Best, DHB Industries, New Century Financial, and Madoff Securities. Chapter-by-Chapter Explanations covering audit planning, risk assessment, materiality, internal controls, professional standards, ethics, fraud detection, and auditor responsibilities. Instructional Objectives & Teaching Tips for each case—perfect for both students and instructors. Clear Application of GAAP, GAAS, PCAOB, and AICPA Standards in practical auditing scenarios. SEO Keywords: auditing solutions, case study answers, Knapp auditing guide, exam preparation, audit risk, Sarbanes-Oxley, forensic accounting, auditor independence, material weaknesses, fraud triangle, audit documentation. Ideal For: Auditing students seeking clarity on complex cases and theory Instructors needing ready-to-use answer keys and lecture aids CPA candidates reinforcing practical auditing knowledge Anyone preparing for exams or assignments in advanced auditing courses Equip yourself with the trusted companion to the 11th edition—get the clarity and confidence you need to excel in your auditing class. Buy now and master auditing through real case solutions!

Content preview

CaseM1.3M M JustMforMFeet,MInc.M M
1




CASE 1.1M




ENRON CORPORATION
M




Synopsis



ArthurMEdwardMAndersenMbuiltMhisMfirm,MArthurMAndersenM&MCompany,MintoMoneMofMtheMlarges
tMandMmostMrespectedMaccountingMfirmsMinMtheMworldMthroughMhisMreputationMforMhonestyMandMintegrity.
M “ThinkMstraight,MtalkMstraight”MwasMhisMmottoMandMheMinsistedMthatMhisMclientsMadoptMthatMsameMattitud

eMwhenMpreparingMandMissuingMtheirMperiodicMfinancialMstatements.M ArthurMAndersen’sMauditingMphiloso
phyMwasMnotMrule-
based,MthatMis,MheMdidMnotMstressMtheMimportanceMofMclientsMcomplyingMwithMspecificMaccountingMrulesMb
ecauseMinMtheMearlyMdaysMofMtheMU.S.MaccountingMprofessionMthereMwereMfewMformalMrulesMandMguideline
sMforMaccountantsMandMauditorsMtoMfollow.M Instead,MAndersenMinvokedMaMsubstance-over-
formMapproachMtoMauditingMandMaccountingMissues.M HeMpassionatelyMbelievedMthatMtheMprimaryMroleMofM
theMauditorMwasMtoMensureMthatMclientsMreportedMfullyMandMhonestlyMtoMtheMpublic,MregardlessMofMtheMcon
sequencesMforMthoseMclients.

Ironically,MArthurMAndersenM&MCo.’sMdramaticMfallMfromMprominenceMresultedMfromMitsMassociat
ionMwithMaMclientMknownMforMaggressiveMandMinnovativeMusesMofM“accountingMgimmicks”MtoMwindowMdr
essMitsMfinancialMstatements.M EnronMCorporation,MAndersen’sMsecondMlargestMclient,MwasMinvolvedMinMla
rge,McomplexMtransactionsMwithMhundredsMofMspecialMpurposeMentitiesM(SPEs)MthatMitMusedMtoMobscureMits
MtrueMfinancialMconditionMandMoperatingMresults.M AmongMotherMuses,MtheseMSPEsMallowedMEnronMtoMdow

nloadMunderperformingMassetsMfromMitsMbalanceMsheetMandMtoMconcealMlargeMoperatingMlosses.M DuringM2
001,MaM seriesMofMcircumstances,MincludingMaMsharpMdeclineMinMtheMpriceMofMEnron’sMstock,MforcedMtheMc
ompanyMtoMassumeM controlM andM ownershipM ofM manyM ofM itsM troubledM SPEs.M AsM aM result,M EnronM wasM
forcedM toM reportM a

, CaseM1.3M M JustMforMFeet,MInc.M M
2
largeM lossM inM OctoberM 2001,M restateM itsM earningsM forM theM previousM fiveM years,M and,M ultimately,M fil
eM forMbankruptcyMinMDecemberM2001.

DuringMtheMearlyMmonthsMofM2002,MAndersenMbecameMtheMfocalMpointMofMattentionMamongMlawMe
nforcementMauthoritiesMsearchingMforMtheMpartiesMresponsibleMforMEnron’sMsuddenMcollapse.MTheMaccusati
onsMdirectedMatMAndersenMcenteredMonMthreeMkeyMissues.M TheMfirstMissueMhadMtoMdoMwithMtheMscopeMofMp
rofessionalMservicesMthatMAndersenMprovidedMtoMEnron.M CriticsMchargedMthatMtheMenormousMconsultingMf
eesMEnronMpaidMAndersenMimpairedMtheMauditMfirm’sMindependence.M TheMsecondMissueMstemmedMfromM
Andersen’sMallegedMroleMinMEnron’sMaggressiveMaccountingMandMfinancialMreportingMtreatmentsMforMitsMS
PE-
relatedMtransactions.MFinally,MtheMmostMembarrassingMissueMwasMtheMmassiveMeffortMofMAndersen’sMHous
tonMofficeMtoMshredMEnronMauditMdocuments,MwhichMeventuallyMledMtoMtheMdemiseMofMtheMfirm.

EnronMCorporation--KeyMFacts



1. ThroughoutMArthurME.MAndersen’sMlife,M“ThinkMStraight,MtalkMstraight”MservedMasMaMguidingMprincip
leM forMhimselfMandMArthurMAndersenM&MCo.,MtheMaccountingMfirmMthatMheMfounded.



2. ArthurMAndersen’sMreputationMforMhonestyMandMintegrityMresultedMinMArthurMAndersenM&MCo.Mgaini
ngMstatureMinMtheMbusinessMcommunityMandMgrowingMintoMoneMofMtheMnation’sMleadingMaccountingMf
irmsMbyMtheMtimeMofMhisMdeathMinM1947.



3. LeonardMSpacekMsucceededMArthurMAndersenMasMmanagingMpartnerMofMArthurMAndersenM&MCo.MinM
1947MandMcontinuedMAndersen’sMlegacyMofMlobbyingMforMmoreMrigorousMaccounting,Mauditing,MandM
ethicalMstandardsMforMtheMpublicMaccountingMprofession.



4. WhenMSpacekMretiredMinM1973,MArthurMAndersenM&MCo.MwasMoneMofMtheMlargestMand,Marguably,Mthe
MmostMprominentMaccountingMfirmMworldwide




5. TheMpredecessorMofMEnronMCorporationMwasManMOmaha-
basedMnaturalMgasMcompanyMcreatedMinM1930;MsteadyMgrowthMinMprofitsMandMsalesMandMnumerousMac
quisitionsMallowedMEnronMtoMbecomeMtheMlargestMnaturalMgasMcompanyMinMtheMUnitedMStatesMbyMthe
Mmid-1980s.




6. DuringMtheM1990s,MKennethMLay,MEnron’sMCEO,MandMhisMtopMsubordinate,MJeffreyMSkilling,M transfo
rmedMtheMcompanyMfromMaMconventionalMnaturalMgasMsupplierMintoManMenergyMtradingMcompany.

, CaseM1.3M M JustMforMFeet,MInc.M M
3
7. LayMandMSkillingMplacedMaMheavyMemphasisMonM“strongMearningsMperformance”MandMonMincreasingM
Enron’sMstatureMinMtheMbusinessMworld.



8. EnronMexecutivesMusedMhundredsMofMSPEsM(specialMpurposeMentities)MtoMarrangeMlargeMandMcomplex relatedMparty



9. DuringM2001,MEnron’sMfinancialMconditionMdeterioratedMrapidlyMafterMmanyMofMtheMcompany’sMSPEM
transactionsMunraveled;MinMDecemberM2001,MEnronMfiledMforMbankruptcy.



10. FollowingMEnron’sMcollapse,MtheMbusinessMpressMandMotherMcriticsMbeganMsearchingMforMpartiesMtoMh
oldMresponsibleMforMwhat,MatMtheMtime,MwasMtheMnation’sMlargestMcorporateMbankruptcy.



11. CriticismMofMAndersen’sMroleMinMtheMEnronMdebacleMfocusedMonMthreeMkeyMissues:M theMlargeMamoun
tMofMconsultingMrevenueMtheMfirmMearnedMfromMEnron,MtheMfirm’sMroleMinMmanyMofMEnron’sMSPEMtra
nsactions,MandMtheMeffortsMofMAndersenMpersonnelMtoMdestroyMEnronMauditMdocuments.



12. Andersen’sMfelonyMconvictionMinMJuneM2002MeffectivelyMendedMtheMfirm’sMlongMandMproudMhistoryMi
nMtheMpublicMaccountingMprofession.



InstructionalMObjectives



1. ToMprovideMstudentsMwithMaMbriefMoverviewMofMtheMhistoryMandMdevelopmentMofMtheMpublicMaccount
ingMprofessionMinMtheMUnitedMStates.



2. ToMexamineMtheM“scopeMofMservices”Missue,MthatMis,MtheMthreatsMtoMauditorMindependenceMposedMbyM
auditMfirmsMprovidingMconsultingMservicesMtoMtheirMauditMclients.



3. ToMexamineMtheMextentMtoMwhichMindependentMauditorsMshouldMbeMinvolvedMinMtheirMclients’Mdecisi
onsMregardingMimportantMaccountingMandMfinancialMreportingMissues.



4. ToMreviewMrecentMrecommendationsMmadeMtoMstrengthenMtheMindependentMauditMfunction.

, CaseM1.3M M JustMforMFeet,MInc.M M
4


5. ToMreviewMauditors’MresponsibilitiesMregardingMtheMpreparationMandMretentionMofMauditMworkpapers.

SuggestionsMforMUse



IMtypicallyMbeginManMauditingMcourseMbyMdiscussingMaMmajorMandMwidelyMpublicizedMauditMcase.MCle
arly,MtheMEnronMcaseMsatisfiesMthoseMcriteria.M TheMpurposeMofMpresentingMsuchMaMcaseMearlyMinMtheMseme
sterMisMnotMonlyMtoMacquaintMstudentsMwithMtheMnatureMofMauditingMbutMalsoMtoMmakeMthemMawareMofMwh
yMtheMindependentMauditMfunctionMisMsoMimportant.M ManyMaccountingMstudentsMareMnotMwellMacquaintedM
withMtheMnatureMofMtheMindependentMauditor'sMworkMenvironment,MnorMareMtheyMgenerallyMfamiliarMwithMt
heMcriticalMroleMtheMindependentMauditMfunctionMplaysMinMourMnationalMeconomy.M Hopefully,McasesMsuch
MasMthisMoneMprovideMstudentsMwithMaM"realityMjolt"MthatMwillMstimulateMtheirMinterestMinMauditingMand,Mpo

ssibly,MmakeMthemMmoreMinclinedMtoMpursueMaMcareerMinMtheMauditingMfield.

TheMEnronMcaseMalsoMservesMasMaMgoodMstartingMpointMforManMauditingMcourseMsinceMitMprovidesMstu
dentsMwithManMoverviewMofMhowMtheMauditingMprofessionMdevelopedMandMevolvedMinMtheMUnitedMStatesMo
verMtheMpastMcentury.M TheMvehicleMusedMtoMpresentMthisMoverviewMisMtheMhistoryMofMArthurMAndersenM&
MCo.M YouMwillMfindMthatMtheMcaseMattemptsMtoMcontrastMtheM“ThinkMstraight,MtalkMstraight”MphilosophyMo

fMArthurME.MAndersen,MtheMfounderMofMtheMAndersenMfirm,MwithMtheMmoreMbusiness-
orientedMapproachMtoMauditingMthatMhisMpredecessorsMadoptedMinMtheMlatterMdecadesMofMtheMtwentiethMcen
tury.

ConsiderMaskingMoneMorMmoreMofMyourMstudentsMtoMinterviewMformerMAndersenMpersonnelMwhoMareM
graduatesMofMyourMschool.M IMhaveMfoundMthatMmanyMformerMAndersenMpartnersMandMemployeesMareMmor
eMthanMwillingMtoMdiscussMtheirMformerMemployerMandMtheMseriesMofMeventsMthatMledMtoMtheMfirm’sMsudde
nMcollapse.MTheseMindividualsMtypicallyMsuggestMthatMfederalMprosecutors’MeffortsMtoM“bringMdown”MtheMe
ntireMAndersenMfirmMasMaMresultMofMtheMdocument-
shreddingMincidentMwasMnotMonlyMunnecessaryMbutMalsoMinequitable,ManMargumentMthatMmanyMmembersMo
fMtheMaccountingMprofession—includingMacademics—findMdifficultMtoM refute.



SuggestedMSolutionsMtoMCaseMQuestions



1. AMlargeMnumberMofMpartiesMboreMsomeMdegreeMofMresponsibilityMforMtheMproblemsMthatMtheMEnronMfi
ascoMultimatelyMposedMforMtheMpublicMaccountingMprofessionMandMtheMindependentMauditMfunction.M TheMf
ollowingMbulletMitemsMidentifyMseveralMofMtheseMpartiesM[seeMbold-
facing]MandMtheMroleMtheyMplayedMinMtheMEnronMdrama.



 TheMleadershipMofMtheMAndersenMfirmMthatMallegedlyMfocusedMtooMmuchMattentionMonMpractice
development
t

 ImpertinentMcorporateMexecutivesMwhoMinsistedMonMaggressive,MifMnotMillegal,MaccountingMand financialMrep

Document information

Uploaded on
January 7, 2026
Number of pages
600
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$28.49

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
PREPPERFECT
4.8
(3474)
Sold
409
Followers
60
Items
12288
Last sold
3 days ago


Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions