100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

CURRENT Medical Diagnosis & Treatment 2026 Test Bank | CMDT 65th Ed MCQs

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
671
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
29-12-2025
Written in
2025/2026

CURRENT Medical Diagnosis & Treatment 2026 Test Bank | CMDT 65th Ed MCQs | Clinical Medicine & USMLE Prep 2️⃣ SEO Product Description (200–300 words) Master real-world clinical decision-making with this comprehensive CURRENT Medical Diagnosis & Treatment 2026 (65th Edition) Test Bank, meticulously developed to reflect how medicine is practiced, tested, and examined at the graduate and postgraduate level. This premium digital resource provides full textbook coverage of CMDT 2026, the gold-standard, clinician-trusted reference used worldwide in internal medicine, family medicine, and primary care training. Every chapter includes 20 high-yield, exam-style MCQs designed to strengthen diagnostic accuracy, differential diagnosis reasoning, and evidence-based management across all body systems and clinical settings. Each question is case-based and clinically realistic, integrating patient history, physical examination findings, risk stratification, investigations, and treatment decisions. Detailed rationales explain not only why an answer is correct, but also why alternative options are inappropriate—reinforcing clinical judgment and minimizing test-taking errors. This test bank is ideal for learners and clinicians preparing for USMLE Step 2 CK, Step 3, internal medicine exams, family medicine boards, and advanced medical management courses. It is equally valuable for physician assistant (PA), nurse practitioner (NP), and advanced nursing programs that rely on CURRENT Medical Diagnosis & Treatment as a core text. Key Features Full-chapter coverage of CURRENT Medical Diagnosis & Treatment 2026 (65th Edition) 20 exam-style MCQs per chapter with evidence-based rationales Emphasis on diagnosis, differential diagnosis, investigations, and management Aligned with current clinical guidelines and standards of care High-yield, time-efficient, and exam-focused digital format Designed to boost scores, sharpen clinical reasoning, and reinforce real-world medical decision-making. 3️⃣ 8 High-Value SEO Keywords CURRENT Medical Diagnosis and Treatment test bank CMDT 2026 MCQs clinical medicine question bank internal medicine exam questions USMLE Step 2 CK clinical MCQs family medicine test bank medical diagnosis and management MCQs primary care clinical question bank 4️⃣ 10 Optimized Hashtags #CurrentMedicalDiagnosis #CMDT2026 #MedicalTestBank #ClinicalMedicine #InternalMedicine #FamilyMedicine #USMLEPrep #MedicalMCQs #PAStudies #NPStudies

Show more Read less
Institution
NCLEX RN
Course
NCLEX RN











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
NCLEX RN
Course
NCLEX RN

Document information

Uploaded on
December 29, 2025
Number of pages
671
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

CURRENT MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS AND
TREATMENT 2026
65TH EDITION


Author(s)Maxine A. Papadakis; Michael
W. Rabow; Kenneth R. McQuaid; Paul L.
Nadler; Erika Leemann Price


TEST BANK

Item 1
Reference
Ch. 1 — Disease Prevention & Health Promotion — Aspirin for
Primary Prevention
Stem
A 58-year-old man with well-controlled hypertension and LDL
120 mg/dL presents for a routine visit. He has no history of
cardiovascular disease, is a non-smoker, and his 10-year ASCVD
risk is estimated at 9%. He asks whether he should start low-

,dose aspirin for prevention. Which is the best
recommendation?
Options
A. Start low-dose aspirin (81 mg daily) because age >55 confers
net benefit.
B. Do not start aspirin routinely; discuss individualized risk and
bleeding risk.
C. Start aspirin only if LDL >130 mg/dL.
D. Start aspirin plus a proton-pump inhibitor for
gastroprotection.
Correct answer
B
Rationale — Correct (B)
CMDT advises against routine low-dose aspirin for primary
prevention when ASCVD risk is not high and bleeding risk exists;
decisions should be individualized after shared decision-making.
Evidence indicates modest ASCVD benefit offset by increased
major bleeding in many patients.
Rationales — Incorrect
A. Age alone does not mandate aspirin; harm from bleeding
may outweigh modest benefit at intermediate risk.
C. LDL threshold alone is not the indication for aspirin initiation
for primary prevention.
D. Adding PPI does not change the overall risk–benefit calculus
to justify routine aspirin for primary prevention.

,Teaching point
Aspirin for primary prevention requires individualized, shared
decision-making weighing ASCVD vs bleeding risk.
Citation (APA)
Papadakis, M. A., McPhee, S. J., & Rabow, M. W. (2026). Current
Medical Diagnosis & Treatment (65th ed.). Ch. 1.
AccessMedicine


Item 2
Reference
Ch. 1 — Disease Prevention & Health Promotion — Colorectal
Cancer Screening
Stem
A 52-year-old woman with no family history of colorectal cancer
presents for preventive care. She asks which screening test you
recommend. She prefers a noninvasive option. How do you
counsel her?
Options
A. No screening needed until age 55 because risk is low.
B. Recommend colonoscopy every 10 years as preferred;
discuss FIT or stool DNA as acceptable alternatives.
C. Recommend flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years only.
D. Recommend CT colonography every 3 years as first-line.
Correct answer
B

, Rationale — Correct (B)
CMDT recommends initiating average-risk colorectal screening
at age 45–50 (CMDT 2026 follows updated guidance to start
earlier); colonoscopy every 10 years is a standard option;
noninvasive annual FIT or multi-target stool DNA at
recommended intervals are acceptable alternatives when
colonoscopy is declined. Shared decision-making about test
choice is appropriate.
Rationales — Incorrect
A. Delay to 55 is inconsistent with current guidance to start
earlier for average risk.
C. Flexible sigmoidoscopy alone is not the preferred strategy in
many settings.
D. CT colonography may be an option but is not universally first-
line nor recommended every 3 years as standard.
Teaching point
Begin average-risk colorectal screening in mid-adulthood; offer
colonoscopy or validated stool tests.
Citation (APA)
Papadakis, M. A., McPhee, S. J., & Rabow, M. W. (2026). Current
Medical Diagnosis & Treatment (65th ed.). Ch. 1.
AccessMedicine+1


Item 3
$39.99
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
NursingTestReady

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
NursingTestReady Teachme2-tutor
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
6 months
Number of followers
0
Documents
140
Last sold
-
NursingTestReady

Targeted nursing test banks with textbook-aligned questions and NCLEX-style MCQs built for nursing exams and assessment success. Practical, high-yield nursing study resources that improve accuracy, confidence, and outcomes. Designed to help you study smarter and pass with confidence.

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions