Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Public Law LLB Revision Guide (ULAW)

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
12
Uploaded on
22-12-2025
Written in
2021/2022

These revision guides provide summaries of unit 1 to unit 9 and an in-depth guide on judicial review and the steps required. This guide features cases, statutes and overarching themes. Theses notes helped me achieve a first. Cases covered: • Entick v Carrington (1765) – all state actions must have legal authority • Attorney General v De Keyser’s Royal Hotel (1920) – statute takes precedent over prerogative • Attorney General v Johnathan Cape (1976) – recognised convention in legal verdict (collective Ministerial Responsibility) • R (on the application of Jackson) v Attorney General (2005) – Lord Hope – Rule of Law is the “ultimate controlling factor on which our constitution is based” • Evans v Attorney General (2015) – “decisions and actions of the executive are, reviewable by the court at the suit of an interested citizen.” (to allow Att. Gens decision would suggest) “a final decision of a court can be set aside by a member of the executive because he does not agree with it” • Burma Oil Co v Lord Advocate (1965) – War Damages Act enacted retrospectively • McGonnell v UK (2000) – highlighted LC’s Position pre CRA • Entick v Carrington (1765) – actions of the state must have authority • Re M (1994) – SoS Home Office in contempt of court for failure to comply with court injunction • Ellen Street Estates v Minister of Health (1934) • Madzimbamuto v Lardner- Burke (1969) • Cheney v Conn (1968) • R v Chaytor (2010) • Strauss Case (1958) • Vauxhall Estates v Liverpool Corporation (1952) • HS2 Action alliance v Secretary of State for Transport (2014) – BofR art 9 v EU Environmental Impact of Infrastructure Directive • Bradlaugh v Gossett (1884) – courts cannot interfere in parliamentary proceedings • Burma Oil v Lord Advocate (1965) – Statutes can be retrospective • Attorney General for New South Wales v Trethowan (1932) • Minister of the Interior v Harris (1952) • R v Secretary of State for Transport ex p. Factortame (no. 2) (1991) • Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza (2004) • St Helen’s Borough Council v Manchester Primary Care Trust (2008) • Attorney General v Fulham Corporation (1921) • Vine v National Dock Labour Board (1957) • British Oxygen v Minister for Transport (1971) • Porter v Magill (2001) • Westminster v London & North Western Railway (1905) • R v Inner London Education Authority, ex p Westminster City Council (1986) • R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Venables (1998) • Roberts v Hopwood (1925) • Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission (1969) • R v Fulham, Hammersmith and Kensington Rent Tribunal (1951) • Associate Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation (1948) • CCSU v Minister for the Civil Service (1984) • R v Soneji (2006) • Bradbury v Enfield London Borough Council (1967) • R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Jeyeanthan (1999) • McInnes v Onslow-Fane (1978) • R v Civil Service Appeal Board, ex p Cunningham (1991) • R (Citizens UK) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2018) • Porter v Magill (2001) • R v Ministry of Defence ex p Smith (1996) • O’Reilly v Mackman (1983) • Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority (1986) • R v Panel of Takeovers and Mergers ex p Datafin (1987) • R v Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs ex World Development Movement (1995) • R (Burkett) v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council (2002) • R v Stratford Upon Avon District Council, ex p Jackson (1985) • Re Racal Communications (1981) • R v Inland Revenue Commission ex p Preston (1985) • R v Knowsley MBC ex p Maguire (1992) • Khan v UK (2000) • S v United Kingdom (2008) • A and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2004) • McCann v DPP (2016) • Castorina v Chief Constable of Surrey (1988) • O’Halloran v UK (2007) • R v Howell (1982) • Robert v Chief Constable of Cheshire Constabulary (1999) • Funke v France (1993) • Flockhart v Robinson (1950) • O’Loughlin v Chief Constable of Essex (1998) • R (on the application of Laporte) v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire (2006) • Police v Reid (1987) • Redmond-Bate v DPP (1999) • Kent v Metropolitan Police Commissioner (1981) • R (on the application of Baroness Jones) v Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis (2020) • DPP v Jones (1999) • Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (no2) (2013) • Attorney General v News Group Newspapers (1987) • Attorney General v English (1983) • Douglas v Hello! (No1) (2001) • CTB v News Group Newspapers (2011) • Venables and Thompson v News Group Newspapers (2001) • Campbell v Mirror News Group (2004) • Murray v Express Newspapers (2008) • Axel Springer AG v Germany (2012) • Von Hannover v Germany (No2) (2012) • Ash v McKennit (2006) • Mosley v News Group Newspapers (2008) • RE JR38 • LNS v Persons Unknown (2010) • Rio Ferdinand v MGN (2011)

Show more Read less
Institution
Course

Content preview

Public Unit - 1 Topic: Constitution
Definitions Statute
The Royal Prerogative – “Discretionary or arbitrary  Magna Carta 1215 – limited
authority… legally left in the hands of the crown” – Dicey monarchy’s power
Constitutional Conventions – “rules of constitutional  Bill of Rights 1689 – Monarch
behaviour which are considered to be binding upon those cannot suspend parliament or
who operate the constitution but which are not enforced by impose taxes; monarch
law courts” – Marshal and Moodie cannot interfere in elections;
“the flesh which clothes the dry bones of the law” - Jennings art9 – freedom of speech
 Act of Unions 1706 – Scotland
became part of Great Britain;
Scotland keep their church
and legal system
Key Info:  Parliament Acts 1911/49 –
House of Commons can
 Public law is split into 3 areas: Constitutional,
bypass House of Lords
administrative, rights and freedoms.  PACE 1984 – details arrest,
 The UKs constitution is unwritten and flexible with search and detention powers
the head of state being the queen. The only other of police as well as limits
countries with unwritten constitutions are Israel and  Human Rights Act 1998 –
New Zealand. Incorporated ECHR to UK law
 Royal Prerogative powers include – royal assent;  Constitutional Reform Act
appointment of QCs; appointment of Prime 2005 – Changed the role of
Ministers; declaration of war; deployment of armed Lord Chancellor; created
forces; entering treaties; mercy and pardons. Supreme Court; Judges
 Conventions can change – Tony Blair was the first to appointed by newly created
Judicial Appointments
attend a select committee – PMs now also tend to
Commission.
seek permission to go to war or use military
interventions
 Parliament is supreme
 There are many sources of Public Law: statute, case
law, conventions, expert writing
Cases
 Entick v Carrington (1765) – all
state actions must have legal
authority
 Attorney General v De
Conventions Keyser’s Royal Hotel (1920) –
 Sewel convention – Parliament cannot legislate on statute takes precedent over
devolved matters prerogative
 Salisbury convention – The House of Lords won’t block  Attorney General v Johnathan
legislation in a governing party’s manifesto Cape (1976) – recognised
 Collective Ministerial Responsibility – Parliament is convention in legal verdict
collectively responsible for actions in its proceedings (collective Ministerial
Responsibility)

Written for

Institution
Study
Unknown
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
December 22, 2025
Number of pages
12
Written in
2021/2022
Type
SUMMARY

Subjects

$4.79
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
charlottegoddard

Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
charlottegoddard University of Law
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
1
Member since
7 months
Number of followers
0
Documents
7
Last sold
6 months ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions