BUL3310 FSU Bailey Unit 4 Latest
Exam Questions with Complete
Correct Answers 2025-2026 Updated.
The doctrine under which employers are liable for torts committed by employees while they are
acting within the scope of their employment is___________.
Joint and several liability
Respondent superior
Negligence per se
Res ipsa loquitur. - Answer Respondent superior
The tort of invasion of the right to privacy
A. Requires in all cases that malice be proved as an element
B. Requires that actual damages be demonstrated
C. Requires that some form of defamation have occurred
D. Protects individuals from the shame and humiliation of having private aspects of their lives
exposed to the public - Answer Protects individuals from the shame and humiliation of
having private aspects of their lives exposed to the public
Most courts allow plaintiffs to use strict liability to collect damages for economic loss in product
liability suits - Answer false
The question "was the harm foreseeable?" is used to establish __________ cause. - Answer
Proximate
The doctrine that creates a rebuttable presumption that a defendant was negligent based on
the nature and circumstances of the injury is - Answer Res Ipsa Loquitur
Whether or not a doctor acted negligently is a question of fact for a jury to decide. - Answer
ttrue
The doctrine of negligence per se applies in which of the following cases? - Answer
, money to pay for their share of the damages. The only solvent defendant is Dan. The most that
Dan will have to pay the plaintiff is
25000
50000
75000
100000 - Answer 100000
Damages need not be proved in a defamation suit if the defamatory statement claims that
A person has a loathsome disease
A doctor is unfit to practice medicine
A person holds political views that he in fact does not
A and B - Answer BOTH
A person has a loathsome disease
A doctor is unfit to practice medicine
To bring a suit for disparagement, the plaintiff must show specific pecuniary losses attributable
to the falsehood.
True
False - Answer True
Wendy Witness testified for the plaintiff in a suit against Dan Defendant in which he was
charged with fraud. The jury found for Dan. Dan wants to sue Wendy for defamation because
the statements she made about him on the witness stand were found to be untrue. What
result?
-Dan cannot sue Wendy for defamation because she has an absolute privilege as a trial witness.
-Dan can sue Wendy for defamation, but must prove actual malice.
-Dan can sue Wendy for slander, but must prove actual damages.
Exam Questions with Complete
Correct Answers 2025-2026 Updated.
The doctrine under which employers are liable for torts committed by employees while they are
acting within the scope of their employment is___________.
Joint and several liability
Respondent superior
Negligence per se
Res ipsa loquitur. - Answer Respondent superior
The tort of invasion of the right to privacy
A. Requires in all cases that malice be proved as an element
B. Requires that actual damages be demonstrated
C. Requires that some form of defamation have occurred
D. Protects individuals from the shame and humiliation of having private aspects of their lives
exposed to the public - Answer Protects individuals from the shame and humiliation of
having private aspects of their lives exposed to the public
Most courts allow plaintiffs to use strict liability to collect damages for economic loss in product
liability suits - Answer false
The question "was the harm foreseeable?" is used to establish __________ cause. - Answer
Proximate
The doctrine that creates a rebuttable presumption that a defendant was negligent based on
the nature and circumstances of the injury is - Answer Res Ipsa Loquitur
Whether or not a doctor acted negligently is a question of fact for a jury to decide. - Answer
ttrue
The doctrine of negligence per se applies in which of the following cases? - Answer
, money to pay for their share of the damages. The only solvent defendant is Dan. The most that
Dan will have to pay the plaintiff is
25000
50000
75000
100000 - Answer 100000
Damages need not be proved in a defamation suit if the defamatory statement claims that
A person has a loathsome disease
A doctor is unfit to practice medicine
A person holds political views that he in fact does not
A and B - Answer BOTH
A person has a loathsome disease
A doctor is unfit to practice medicine
To bring a suit for disparagement, the plaintiff must show specific pecuniary losses attributable
to the falsehood.
True
False - Answer True
Wendy Witness testified for the plaintiff in a suit against Dan Defendant in which he was
charged with fraud. The jury found for Dan. Dan wants to sue Wendy for defamation because
the statements she made about him on the witness stand were found to be untrue. What
result?
-Dan cannot sue Wendy for defamation because she has an absolute privilege as a trial witness.
-Dan can sue Wendy for defamation, but must prove actual malice.
-Dan can sue Wendy for slander, but must prove actual damages.
