100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

University of Michigan BIOL 173 – Test 2 Comprehensive Review: Competition and Fitness Concepts

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
13
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
09-12-2025
Written in
2025/2026

This document offers a thorough and structured review of competition and fitness concepts for BIOL 173 Test 2 at the University of Michigan. It covers ecological and evolutionary principles related to interspecific and intraspecific competition, resource limitation, competitive exclusion, fitness measurements, adaptation, and experimental interpretation. Designed to reinforce course learning, this review provides clear explanations and examples to help students master key concepts and prepare confidently for the exam.

Show more Read less









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
December 9, 2025
Number of pages
13
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

DOWNLOAD




UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN




Test 2 Comprehensive Review of
Competition and Fitness
Concepts



Course: BIOL 173 BIOLOGY LAB

, Quiz Questions:
One can measure biological competition and determine superior vs. inferior competitors.
Yet, competition is said to be detrimental to all species facing it. Explain this seeming
paradox.
• One organisms may do better than the other but neither does as well as it would by itself.
They both have to work hard to get those limiting resources.
• All organisms require resources to grow, reproduce, and survive. For example, animals
require food (such as other organisms) and water, whereas plants require soil nutrients (for
example, nitrogen), light, and water. Organisms, however, cannot acquire a resource when
other organisms consume or defend that resource. Therefore, competitors reduce each
other's growth, reproduction, or survival.

Define competition: An interaction between species that harms them both. (both species need/
share a limiting resource)

Comparing the height of tomato plants in a 50T pot with the height of tomato plants in a
25T/25A pot tells us about the relative strength of intra- vs. inter-specific competition.
Explain that.
• 50T tells you about intraspecific competition, how ―extra‖ T lowers growth of the T
• 25T/25A tells you about interspecific competition, how extra A lowers growth of T
• If height of T in 50T > Height of T in 25T/25A, then A is stronger competitor than T

How should we interpret the following hypothetical results? Assume all differences are
significant (three points) Height, 25T- 100 mm
Height, 50T- 50 mm
Height, T in 25T/25A- 150 mm
• 25T vs. 50T: tells you intraspecific competition is happening
• height of T in 25T/25A is higher than 50T, but it’s also higher than 25T.
• That means 25A are actually helping T (mutualism, cross-feeding?)

If the data say plant P grows taller in a pot with 50P than in a pot with 25P and 25Q,
which is more severe for plant P, intra- or inter-specific competition? Explain.
• Inter-specific is worse.
• P plants do better with 25 extra of their own kind (50P) than with an extra 25Q.

Using hypothetical plants P & Q again, what result(s) would tell you that P & Q were in a
mutualistic relationship?
• P plants in 25P/25Q > P plants in 25P and
Q plants in 25P/25Q > Q plants in 25Q
means closer means further apar
Circle the factors below that are associated with a MORE smaller variance larger variance
significant result smaller sample larger sample
• T-score: HIGHER values of the t-score, indicate that a large lower T-score higher T-score
difference exists between the two sample sets. lower p value higher p value
• Means: FARTHER apart, large difference exists between the
two sample sets
• Sample size: LARGER, Larger sample sizes provide more accurate mean values, identify
outliers that could skew the data in a smaller sample and provide a smaller margin of error.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
grade_bender Rasmussen College
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
1035
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
958
Documents
1871
Last sold
1 month ago
Grade_bender all documents, bundles, and flashcards

Access the most current and rigorously authenticated examination materials, including actual tests with 100% verification. Our comprehensive repository encompasses ATI, Nursing, PMHNP, TNCC, USMLE, ACLS, WGU, and all associated certification and academic assessments—each designed to ensure guaranteed success. Should a specific resource be unavailable in our catalog, our dedicated support team will procure it promptly upon request. Purchase with absolute confidence. We strongly encourage all clients to submit a review post-acquisition to affirm complete satisfaction and uphold our commitment to academic excellence.

Read more Read less
3.8

146 reviews

5
71
4
31
3
14
2
8
1
22

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions