According to the Aristotelian approach to ethics, it is not easy to figure out how best to help
humans flourish. - Answers True
According to the Aristotelian approach to ethics, we do not need to know about human nature in
order to figure out human flourishing. - Answers False
According to the Aristotelian approach to ethics, every social institution has a moral purpose -
to promote human flourishing in some way. - Answers True
The argument that markets are good because they are necessary for liberty and the argument
that markets are good because they produce good outcomes are incompatible - they cannot
both be (completely) right. - Answers True
The fact that market mechanisms supply us with most of the things we need to survive means
that markets must be morally good. - Answers False
According to Hausman & McPherson, people act to satisfy their preferences and therefore they
never act to harm their own well-being. - Answers False
According to Hausman & McPherson, paternalism is never bad. - Answers False
According to Sandel, cannibalism between consenting adults poses the ultimate test for the
libertarian principle of self-ownership and the idea of justice that follows from it. - Answers True
According to Friedman, managers should run corporations in the interests of
shareholders/stockholders because that is what, as employees of the shareholders, they have
signed on to do. - Answers True
According to Friedman, managers have responsibilities beyond those they assumes voluntarily
so they must sometimes thwart even the legitimate goals of their shareholders. - Answers False
According to the view Stone advocates, managers should always seek to maximize profits
because this goal serves as a "polestar"—pursuing it leads to benefits for all stakeholders. -
Answers False
According to Freeman, stockholders are the owners of a corporation and so corporations
should be run solely in their interests. - Answers False
According to the Aristotelian approach to ethics, - Answers people must use reason to identify
and balance important human interests.
The welfare/outcome argument for markets holds that - Answers market competition creates
Pareto improvements (i.e., mutually agreeable deals), providing benefits to individuals is morally
good, other things being equal, Pareto improvements (i.e., mutually agreeable deals) are
beneficial.