Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 23 pages
Exam (elaborations)

RSK4804 Assignment 2 2025 ALL ANSWERS Due 30 August 2025

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 23 pages

RSK4804 Assignment 2 2025 ALL ANSWERS Due 30 August 2025

Content preview

,RSK4804 Assignment 2 2025 WELL ANSWERED
QUESTIONS Due 30 August 2025
RSK4804 — Assignment 2 (Answer guide) — Detailed worked
answers & marking scheme
Due: 30 August 2025 — You asked for everything explained
clearly; below I give model answers, worked formulas, an
illustrative numeric example where the question asks for
computation (so you can copy/adjust with your own
numbers), and a suggested marking breakdown so you know
how to get full marks.


QUESTION 1 — Credit Default Swaps (Total: 10 marks)
(a) Why are credit default swaps (CDS) necessary? (2 marks)
Model answer (concise):
1. Risk transfer / hedging: CDS allow lenders/investors to
transfer the credit risk of a borrower (default,
restructuring) to another party — this hedges exposure
without selling the underlying loan or bond. (1 mark)
2. Price discovery & liquidity: CDS markets provide market-
implied default probabilities and increase liquidity for
credit risk, enabling better pricing of credit risk and
facilitating trading/positioning. (1 mark)

, Marking guidance (2 marks): 1 mark for hedging/risk-transfer
idea; 1 mark for market/pricing/liquidity function.


(b) Why are some investors not in favour of CDS? (2 marks)
Model answer (concise):
1. Counterparty risk & opacity: CDS expose the buyer to the
credit of the protection seller — if the seller defaults,
protection may evaporate. Markets can be opaque (OTC)
and complicated. (1 mark)
2. Moral hazard & speculative use: CDS can be used for
speculative bets (“naked” CDS) creating moral hazard and
amplifying systemic risk; they may also obscure actual
exposures. (1 mark)
Marking guidance (2 marks): 1 mark for counterparty/opacity
point; 1 mark for moral hazard/speculation/systemic risk.


(c) Case analysis: Magong Rural Investments and Moepi
Minerals Exploration (6 marks)
Context (assumed): Magong holds industry/loan exposure to
Moepi (a small mining explorer). Moepi is capital-intensive
and cyclical; there are worries about commodity prices and
exploration risk. Magong is assessing whether to use CDS or
other actions.

Document information

Uploaded on
August 29, 2025
Number of pages
23
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$2.77

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
ISTUDYMASTER
4.3
(7)
Sold
43
Followers
0
Items
82
Last sold
9 months ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions