,PLS1502 Assignment 3 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2
2025 – DUE 2025;100% trusted ,comprehensive and complete
reliable solution with clear explanation
2 ANSWERS FOR OPTION A AND B
Option A
Title
Decoding African Philosophy: Samuel Imbo on Politics,
Assumptions, and the Universality of Reason
Introduction
The question of what constitutes African philosophy has long been
contested among scholars. Samuel E. Imbo describes the very definition
of African philosophy as “highly coded,” suggesting that any attempt to
define the field is never neutral but rather politically and historically
loaded. For Imbo, definitions of African philosophy carry assumptions
about identity, legitimacy, and intellectual authority. This essay explores
why Imbo regards the definition of African philosophy as highly coded.
First, it outlines how African philosophy is defined in Imbo’s text. It
then discusses the politics and assumptions that accompany such
definitions. The essay also examines the impact of European rationality
claiming universality, before reflecting on whether African philosophy
should continue to concern itself with these politics of definition.
, How African Philosophy is Defined in Imbo’s Text
Imbo begins by noting that African philosophy cannot be reduced to a
single or simple definition. Instead, it encompasses a wide variety of
approaches, including ethnophilosophy, professional philosophy, sage
philosophy, and nationalist-ideological philosophy. What makes its
definition “highly coded,” however, is that every attempt at defining it
implies a set of assumptions about who counts as a philosopher and what
counts as philosophy. For example, some definitions restrict African
philosophy to written, academic discourse, while others recognize oral
traditions and communal worldviews as legitimate forms of
philosophical thought. Thus, for Imbo, African philosophy is defined not
just by content but also by power relations, because the very act of
defining it often privileges certain voices while excluding others.
The Politics and Assumptions of Defining African Philosophy
Imbo stresses that the definition of African philosophy is not an innocent
or objective task; it is always political. Defining African philosophy
involves assumptions about the nature of rationality, universality, and
culture. One assumption often made is that philosophy must resemble
the Western tradition of abstract, critical reasoning in order to qualify as
“true philosophy.” This assumption marginalizes African intellectual
traditions by measuring them against European standards.
The politics of definition also emerge in debates among African
philosophers themselves. Some argue that African philosophy must be
strictly academic and professional, distancing itself from ethnographic or
cultural accounts. Others, like proponents of ethnophilosophy, claim that
African philosophy is found in collective worldviews, proverbs, myths,
and traditions. According to Imbo, the clash between these positions
reveals how definitions are “coded” with competing political projects:
2025 – DUE 2025;100% trusted ,comprehensive and complete
reliable solution with clear explanation
2 ANSWERS FOR OPTION A AND B
Option A
Title
Decoding African Philosophy: Samuel Imbo on Politics,
Assumptions, and the Universality of Reason
Introduction
The question of what constitutes African philosophy has long been
contested among scholars. Samuel E. Imbo describes the very definition
of African philosophy as “highly coded,” suggesting that any attempt to
define the field is never neutral but rather politically and historically
loaded. For Imbo, definitions of African philosophy carry assumptions
about identity, legitimacy, and intellectual authority. This essay explores
why Imbo regards the definition of African philosophy as highly coded.
First, it outlines how African philosophy is defined in Imbo’s text. It
then discusses the politics and assumptions that accompany such
definitions. The essay also examines the impact of European rationality
claiming universality, before reflecting on whether African philosophy
should continue to concern itself with these politics of definition.
, How African Philosophy is Defined in Imbo’s Text
Imbo begins by noting that African philosophy cannot be reduced to a
single or simple definition. Instead, it encompasses a wide variety of
approaches, including ethnophilosophy, professional philosophy, sage
philosophy, and nationalist-ideological philosophy. What makes its
definition “highly coded,” however, is that every attempt at defining it
implies a set of assumptions about who counts as a philosopher and what
counts as philosophy. For example, some definitions restrict African
philosophy to written, academic discourse, while others recognize oral
traditions and communal worldviews as legitimate forms of
philosophical thought. Thus, for Imbo, African philosophy is defined not
just by content but also by power relations, because the very act of
defining it often privileges certain voices while excluding others.
The Politics and Assumptions of Defining African Philosophy
Imbo stresses that the definition of African philosophy is not an innocent
or objective task; it is always political. Defining African philosophy
involves assumptions about the nature of rationality, universality, and
culture. One assumption often made is that philosophy must resemble
the Western tradition of abstract, critical reasoning in order to qualify as
“true philosophy.” This assumption marginalizes African intellectual
traditions by measuring them against European standards.
The politics of definition also emerge in debates among African
philosophers themselves. Some argue that African philosophy must be
strictly academic and professional, distancing itself from ethnographic or
cultural accounts. Others, like proponents of ethnophilosophy, claim that
African philosophy is found in collective worldviews, proverbs, myths,
and traditions. According to Imbo, the clash between these positions
reveals how definitions are “coded” with competing political projects:
