power
Give this one a try later!
the ability of a study to detect a difference/effect when a difference/effect
really exists
case control
,Give this one a try later!
subjects are selected based on their disease/case status
look backwardss to determine which subjects had the exposure/risk factor
criterion validity
Give this one a try later!
the extent to whcih teh scores on a measure are a good reflection of a
gold standard
content validity
Give this one a try later!
the extent to which the instrument's content adequately captures the
construct
ethical decision making
Give this one a try later!
identify values in conflict
get the facts
identify options
identify ethically relevant variables
are there critical distinctions
explicate status of ethically relevant variables and distinctions
, make a judgement
develop policy recommendations
method section: QUAL studies
Give this one a try later!
discuss many of the same issues as quantitative researchers but with
different emphases
providing more information about the research setting and context of the
study
describe the researchers' efforts to enhance the integrity of the study
barriers to appreciation of research risk
Give this one a try later!
therapeutic misconception
legacy misconception
PICOT
Give this one a try later!
, population
intervention/influence
comparisson
outcome
timeframe
eval of biophysical measures
Give this one a try later!
strong on accuracy, objectivity, validity, and precision
may be cost effective
but caution may be required for their use, advance skills
tuskagee syphilis experiment
Give this one a try later!
conducted 1932-1972
penicillin introduced 1942
subjects not offered or told about penicillin
diagnostic spinal taps offered as free treament
wives and children contracted the illness
principle related
Give this one a try later!
Give this one a try later!
the ability of a study to detect a difference/effect when a difference/effect
really exists
case control
,Give this one a try later!
subjects are selected based on their disease/case status
look backwardss to determine which subjects had the exposure/risk factor
criterion validity
Give this one a try later!
the extent to whcih teh scores on a measure are a good reflection of a
gold standard
content validity
Give this one a try later!
the extent to which the instrument's content adequately captures the
construct
ethical decision making
Give this one a try later!
identify values in conflict
get the facts
identify options
identify ethically relevant variables
are there critical distinctions
explicate status of ethically relevant variables and distinctions
, make a judgement
develop policy recommendations
method section: QUAL studies
Give this one a try later!
discuss many of the same issues as quantitative researchers but with
different emphases
providing more information about the research setting and context of the
study
describe the researchers' efforts to enhance the integrity of the study
barriers to appreciation of research risk
Give this one a try later!
therapeutic misconception
legacy misconception
PICOT
Give this one a try later!
, population
intervention/influence
comparisson
outcome
timeframe
eval of biophysical measures
Give this one a try later!
strong on accuracy, objectivity, validity, and precision
may be cost effective
but caution may be required for their use, advance skills
tuskagee syphilis experiment
Give this one a try later!
conducted 1932-1972
penicillin introduced 1942
subjects not offered or told about penicillin
diagnostic spinal taps offered as free treament
wives and children contracted the illness
principle related
Give this one a try later!
