Answers
The process of acquiring and analyzing information stored on physical storage
media, such as computer hard drives, smartphones, GPS systems, and removable
media. Includes both the recovery of hidden and deleted information and the
process of identifying who created a file or message. - CORRECT ANSWER Disk
Forensics
The study of the source and content of email as evidence, including the
identification of the sender, recipient, date, time, and origination location of an
email message. - CORRECT ANSWER Email Forensics
the process of examining network traffic, including transaction logs and real-time
monitoring using sniffers and tracing. - CORRECT ANSWER Network Forensics
is the process of piecing together where and when a user has been on the
internet. For example, you can use internet forensics to determine whether
inappropriate internet content access and downloading were accidental. -
CORRECT ANSWER Internet Forensics
also known as malware forensics, is the process of examining malicious computer
code - CORRECT ANSWER Software Forensics
The process of searching memory in real time, typically for working with
compromised hosts or to identify system abuse. - CORRECT ANSWER Live system
forensics
,is the process of searching the contents of cell phones. A few years ago, this was
just not a big issue, but with the ubiquitous nature of cell phones today, cell-
phone
forensics is a very important topic. A cell phone can be a treasure trove of
evidence. Modern
cell phones are essentially computers with processors, memory, even hard drives
and operating
systems, and they operate on networks. Phone forensics also includes VoIP and
traditional phones and may overlap the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of
1978 (FISA), the USA
PATRIOT Act, and the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act
(CALEA) in the United States. - CORRECT ANSWER Cell-Phone Forensics
From the time the evidence is first seized by a law
enforcement officer or civilian investigator until the moment it is shown in court,
the whereabouts and custody of the evidence, and how it was handled and stored
and by whom, must be able to be shown at all times. Failure to maintain the
proper chain of custody can lead to evidence being excluded from trial. - CORRECT
ANSWER Chain of Custody
One very important principle is to touch the system as little as possible. It is
possible to make changes to the system in the process of examining it, which is
very undesirable. Obviously, you have to interact with the system to investigate it.
The answer is to make a forensic copy and work with that copy. You can make a
forensic copy with most major forensic tools such as AccessData's Forensic Toolkit,
Guidance Software's EnCase, or PassMark's OSForensics. There are also open
source software products that allow copying of original source information. To be
, specific, make a copy and analyze the copy. - CORRECT ANSWER Don't Touch the
Suspect Drive
The next issue is documentation. The rule is that you document everything. Who
was present when the device was seized? What was connected to the device or
showing on the screen when you seized it? What specific tools and techniques did
you use? Who had access to the evidence from the time of seizure until the time
of trial? All of this must be documented. And when in doubt, err on the side of
over-documentation. It really is not possible to document too much information
about an investigation. - CORRECT ANSWER Document trail
It is absolutely critical to the integrity of your investigation as well as to
maintaining the chain of custody that you secure the evidence. It is common to
have the forensic lab be a locked room with access given only to those who must
enter. Then, evidence is usually secured in a safe, with access given out only on a
need-to-know basis. You have to take every reasonable precaution to ensure that
no one can tamper with the evidence. - CORRECT ANSWER Secure the Evidence
Standard used by a trial judge to make a preliminary assessment of whether an
expert's scientific testimony is based on reasoning or methodology that is
scientifically valid and can
properly be applied to the facts at issue. Under this standard, the factors that may
be considered in determining whether the methodology is valid are: (1) whether
the theory or
technique in question can be and has been tested; (2) whether it has been
subjected to peer
review and publication; (3) its known or potential error rate; (4) the existence and
maintenance