Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 4 pages
Other

PHIL 333 UNIT 1 Foundations Of Ethics: Key Concepts and Theories Refresher for Final Exam

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 4 pages

PHIL 333 UNIT 1 Foundations Of Ethics: Key Concepts and Theories Refresher for Final Exam

Content preview

PHIL 333 UNIT 1 Foundations Of Ethics: Key Concepts and Theories Refresher for Final Exam

2
Kantian Deontology: Don’t lie—lying cannot be universalized and disrespects patient
UNIT 1 – FOUNDATIONS OF ETHICS
autonomy. Contractarianism: Lying is unacceptable if no rational person would agree to
it in a fair system. Virtue Ethics: Be compassionate and honest—tell the truth gently.
Ethics: The study of right and wrong; asks how we ought to act. eminist Ethics: Consider the patient's vulnerability, emotional context, and power
Morality: Real-life beliefs and behaviors about right/wrong. imbalance— tailor the response with care.
Descriptive Ethics: Describes what people believe morally. Ex: "Most believe lying
is wrong."
Prescriptive Ethics: States what people should believe/do. Ex: "Lying is wrong."
Amoral: Without moral awareness (e.g., machines, storms).
Immoral: Aware but violating morality (e.g., intentional harm).
Positive Rights: Rights to receive something. Ex: education, healthcare.
Negative Rights: Rights to be left alone. Ex: privacy, free speech.
Prima Facie Duty: A moral duty that seems binding unless overridden. Ex: keeping a
promise.
Actual Duty: The duty that wins when duties conflict. Ex: breaking promise to save a
life.
Metaethics: Explores meaning of moral terms (e.g., "What is good?").
Normative Ethics: Decides what is right/wrong (e.g., duty, outcomes, virtue).
Applied Ethics: Applies moral reasoning to real-life issues (e.g., abortion, AI, climate
ethics). Moral Reasoning: Clarify the issue → gather facts → evaluate reasons →
reach conclusion. Ethical Argument: Has a clear question, moral + factual
premises, and a logical conclusion. Valid Argument: The conclusion logically
follows from premises.
Sound Argument: Valid + true premises = strong reasoning.
Ethical Questions: Start with “Should…” or “Is it right to…” to frame a precise issue.
Virtue in Professions: Good professionals don’t just follow rules — they act with
integrity and moral character.
“Learn Before You Leap”: Always understand someone’s reasoning fully before
criticizing it — avoid straw man fallacies



Chapter 2
Act Utilitarianism: Focus on consequences. The right act is the one that produces the
greatest happiness in this specific case. Nurse gives placebo to calm a patient
Rule Utilitarianism: Focus on general rules. Follow rules that, if universally followed,
produce the most happiness overall. Hospital policy mandates truth-telling for long-
term trust.
Kantian Deontology: Focus on duty and rationality. Act only on principles you can
will as universal law. Never treat others as mere means. Doctor refuses to mislead a
patient about their diagnosis.
Contractarianism: Morality based on rational agreement under fair conditions.
Right acts are those rational individuals would agree to from a position of equality.
Medical ethics codes built from fair, agreed principles.
Virtue Ethics: Focus on moral character. Right action is what a virtuous person
would do— motivated by traits like honesty, courage, compassion. Doctor comforts
grieving family out of kindness, not duty.
Feminist Ethics: Emphasizes empathy, care, context, and relational dynamics.
Morality must account for lived experience and social inequalities. Social worker
speaks up for a disadvantaged mother overlooked in treatment decisions.
Applyng Theories to a Case (e.g., lying to a patient):
Act Utilitarianism: Lie if it reduces suffering and increases overall happiness.
Utilitarianism is outcome-focused but risks justifying harm to individuals.
Rule Utilitarianism: Don’t lie—truth-telling builds trust and leads to better outcomes in
the long run.

®™

Document information

Uploaded on
June 24, 2025
Number of pages
4
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Other
Person
Unknown
$15.49

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Stuviatlas
3.8
(436)
Sold
1861
Followers
1470
Items
7347
Last sold
2 days ago




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions