100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

COURT CASES (WGU C963) ACTUAL COURT CASES STUDY GUIDE with Complete Test Questions and Correct Solutions ||A+ GRADED!!!

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
5
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
20-06-2025
Written in
2024/2025

COURT CASES (WGU C963) ACTUAL COURT CASES STUDY GUIDE with Complete Test Questions and Correct Solutions ||A+ GRADED!!! 1. United States v. Windsor - ANSWER Federal government must provide benefits to legally married same-sex couples 2. Obergefell v. Hodges - ANSWER States obligated to recognize same-sex marriage from other states. 3. Brown v Board ofEducation of Topeka (1954) - ANSWER Supreme Court ruling that overturned the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case of 1896. "Separate but equal" is Unconstitutional in the field of public education 4. Mapp v. Ohio - ANSWER Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court) 5. Gideon v. Wainwright - ANSWER A person who cannot afford an attorney may have one appointed by the government 6. Sherbert vs. Verner - ANSWER Unemployment may not be denied on religious basis 7. Grsiwold v. Connecticut - ANSWER Although several state constitutions do list the right to privacy as a protected right, the explicit recognition by the Supreme Court of a right to privacy in the U.S. Constitution emerged only in the middle of the twentieth century. In this 1965 case, the court spelled out the right to privacy for the first time in a case that struck down a state law forbidding even married individuals to use any form of contraception. 8. Miranda v. Arizona - ANSWER Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. 9. Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections - ANSWER Struck down poll taxes at the state level 10. Tinker v. Des Moines - ANSWER Students have the right to symbolic speech at school as long as it is not disruptive 11. Brandenburg v. Ohio - ANSWER 1969--Determined that a law that proscribes advocacy of violence for political reform is constitutional if applied to speech that is not directed toward producing imminent lawlessness and is not likely to produce such action is not constitutional. 12. Miller v. California - ANSWER A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a "prurient interest" and being "patently offensive" and lacking in value. 13. Cohen v. California - ANSWER This case involved an arrest and conviction for disturbing the peace for wearing a jacket expressing opposition to the draft (and the Vietnam War). The conviction was overturned by the Supreme Court since his actions were silent and he made no attempt to otherwise disturb the peace.

Show more Read less
Institution
WGU C963 COURT CASES
Course
WGU C963 COURT CASES









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
WGU C963 COURT CASES
Course
WGU C963 COURT CASES

Document information

Uploaded on
June 20, 2025
Number of pages
5
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Content preview

COURT CASES (WGU C963) ACTUAL
COURT CASES STUDY GUIDE with
Complete Test Questions and Correct
Solutions ||A+ GRADED!!!

1. United States v. Windsor - ANSWER ✓ Federal government must
provide benefits to legally married same-sex couples

2. Obergefell v. Hodges - ANSWER ✓ States obligated to recognize
same-sex marriage from other states.

3. Brown v Board ofEducation of Topeka (1954) - ANSWER ✓ Supreme
Court ruling that overturned the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court
Case of 1896. "Separate but equal" is Unconstitutional in the field of
public education

4. Mapp v. Ohio - ANSWER ✓ Established the exclusionary rule was
applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in
court)

5. Gideon v. Wainwright - ANSWER ✓ A person who cannot afford an
attorney may have one appointed by the government

6. Sherbert vs. Verner - ANSWER ✓ Unemployment may not be denied
on religious basis

7. Grsiwold v. Connecticut - ANSWER ✓ Although several state
constitutions do list the right to privacy as a protected right, the
explicit recognition by the Supreme Court of a right to privacy in the
U.S. Constitution emerged only in the middle of the twentieth century.
In this 1965 case, the court spelled out the right to privacy for the first
time in a case that struck down a state law forbidding even married
individuals to use any form of contraception.

, 8. Miranda v. Arizona - ANSWER ✓ Supreme Court held that criminal
suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney
and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by
police.

9. Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections - ANSWER ✓ Struck down
poll taxes at the state level

10. Tinker v. Des Moines - ANSWER ✓ Students have the right to
symbolic speech at school as long as it is not disruptive

11. Brandenburg v. Ohio - ANSWER ✓ 1969--Determined that a
law that proscribes advocacy of violence for political reform is
constitutional if applied to speech that is not directed toward
producing imminent lawlessness and is not likely to produce such
action is not constitutional.

12. Miller v. California - ANSWER ✓ A 1973 Supreme Court
decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community
standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms
of appealing to a "prurient interest" and being "patently offensive" and
lacking in value.

13. Cohen v. California - ANSWER ✓ This case involved an arrest
and conviction for disturbing the peace for wearing a jacket
expressing opposition to the draft (and the Vietnam War). The
conviction was overturned by the Supreme Court since his actions
were silent and he made no attempt to otherwise disturb the peace.

14. Roe v. Wade - ANSWER ✓ (1973) legalized abortion on the
basis of a woman's right to privacy

15. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission - ANSWER ✓
A 2010 landmark Supreme Court case that ruled that individuals,
corporations, and unions could donate unlimited amounts of money to
groups that make independent political expenditures.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
SmartscoreAaron Chicago State University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
34
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
3
Documents
2948
Last sold
5 days ago
SMARTSCORES LIBRARY

Get top-tier academic support for Psychology, Nursing, Business, Engineering, HRM, Math, and more. Our team of professional tutors delivers high-quality homework, quiz, and exam assistance—ensuring scholarly excellence and grade-boosting results. Trust our collaborative expertise to help you succeed in any course at U.S.A Institutions.

3.8

4 reviews

5
2
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions