Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 26 pages
Exam (elaborations)

HSC380 Ethics in HC - Midterm Exam Review (Qns & Ans) - USU 2025.

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 26 pages

HSC380 Ethics in HC - Midterm Exam Review (Qns & Ans) - USU 2025.HSC380 Ethics in HC - Midterm Exam Review (Qns & Ans) - USU 2025.HSC380 Ethics in HC - Midterm Exam Review (Qns & Ans) - USU 2025.

Content preview

HSC380 Ethics in Healthcare

Midterm Exam Review

(Questions & Solutions)

2025




©2025

,1. Case Scenario: In a clinical trial for an innovative cancer therapy, a
patient is enrolled without receiving a simplified explanation of the study
protocols and risks.
Question: Which ethical principle is most directly compromised when
a patient is not provided information in clear, lay terms?
- A. Non-maleficence
- B. Beneficence
- C. Respect for Autonomy
- D. Justice
Correct ANS: C. Respect for Autonomy
Rationale: Informed consent is a manifestation of respecting a
patient’s autonomy. When information is overly complex or not tailored
to the patient’s level of understanding, the patient’s ability to make an
informed decision is undermined.

2. Case Scenario: A 70-year-old patient with advanced dementia faces a
life-sustaining treatment decision. The patient’s previously expressed
wishes are known, but family members now insist on continuation of
treatment.
Question: Which decision-making standard should the healthcare
team primarily use?
- A. Best interest standard
- B. Substituted judgment
- C. Paternalism
- D. Utilitarian approach
Correct ANS: B. Substituted judgment
Rationale: The substituted judgment standard calls for the surrogate
decision-maker to make choices based on the patient’s previously
expressed values and preferences rather than family members’ current
wishes.

3. Case Scenario: During the informed consent process for a genetic
research study, potential participants are overwhelmed by excessive
©2025

, technical details that obscure the essential risks and benefits.
Question: Which of the following modifications would most improve
the informed consent process?
- A. Providing additional research data
- B. Relying solely on written consent forms
- C. Using simplified language and clear summaries
- D. Delegating consent to a research coordinator only
Correct ANS: C. Using simplified language and clear summaries
Rationale: Simplifying the language helps ensure that participants
truly understand the intervention, risks, and benefits, thereby upholding
the ethical standard of informed consent.

4. Case Scenario: In the midst of a pandemic, an intensive care unit
(ICU) has limited beds available. The hospital must decide which patients
receive access to life-saving treatments based on projected survival and
recovery metrics.
Question: Which ethical principle principally supports these allocation
decisions?
- A. Beneficence
- B. Justice
- C. Autonomy
- D. Non-maleficence
Correct ANS: B. Justice
Rationale: Distributive justice focuses on the fair and equitable
allocation of scarce resources in which treatments are provided
according to defined medical criteria, such as likelihood of benefit.

5. Case Scenario: A hospital employs advanced data analytics to predict
patient risks without obtaining explicit consent to use personal health
information.
Question: Which ethical principle is most at risk in this scenario?
- A. Beneficence
- B. Non-maleficence
- C. Autonomy
- D. Justice
©2025

Document information

Uploaded on
June 9, 2025
Number of pages
26
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$15.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
EmilioOchieng
4.1
(24)
Sold
148
Followers
17
Items
4032
Last sold
3 months ago


Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions