Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 3 pages
Exam (elaborations)

D017 School Law WGU Test Questions and Correct Answers

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 3 pages

D017 School Law WGU Test Questions and Correct Answers

Content preview

D017: School Law WGU Test Questions
and Correct Answers
Lemon v Kurtzman - Answer: 1st Amendment (religion) Three tests are described for deciding
whether the government is improperly involved with religion.To withstand scrutiny under the Lemon
test, government action must (1) have a secular (nonreligious) purpose, (2) have a primary effect
that neither advances nor impedes religion (3) avoid excessive government entanglement with
religion.



Wallace v Jaffree - Answer: 1st Amendment (religion) The Court indicated that laws calling for silent
meditation or prayer in public schools without a legislative intent to impose prayer might withstand
scrutiny under the Establishment Clause. Therefore, the constitutionality of laws authorizing a
moment of silence for prayer or meditation in public schools.



Good News Club v. Milford - Answer: 1st Amendment (religion) Court ruled that the school could
not deny the Good News Club (christian organization for children) use of the building after school
based on the religious nature of the club.



Lee v. Weisman (1992) - Answer: 1st Amendment (religion) Prayer at graduation: schools may not
sponsor clerics to conduct even non-denominational prayer.



Santa Fe Ind. SD v. Doe - Answer: 1st Amendment (religion) It ruled that a policy permitting student-
led, student-initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause of the
First Amendment.



Tinker v Des Moines - Answer: 1st Amendment (Student Expression) Students can express
ideological views at school unless the expression threatens a substantial disruption of the
educational process or interferes with the rights of others.



Bethel Sch Dist. v Fraser - Answer: 1st Amendment (Student Expression) School authorities can
censor lewd, vulgar, or indecent student expression and can decide what falls in the prohibited
categories.



Hazelwood Sch Dist. v. Kuhlmeier - Answer: 1st Amendment (Student Expression) School authorities
can censor student expression in school-related activities for pedagogical reasons. Court
acknowledged school authorities' broad discretion to ensure that such expression occurring in school

Document information

Uploaded on
June 6, 2025
Number of pages
3
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$13.49

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Sold
1
Followers
0
Items
320
Last sold
11 months ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions