• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 10 pages
Exam (elaborations)

FAC-C Certification Exam (Actual) Exam Rated A+

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 10 pages

FAC-C Certification Exam (Actual) Exam Rated A+ All non-price factors are evaluated on a pass/fail basis - Answer - Which of the following statements is true regarding the lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) source selection approach? Allow maximum flexibility in making tradeoffs among factors - Answer - The most successful scoring or rating methods for tradeoffs: Neither favorable or unfavorably based on past performance - Answer - If an offeror lacks relevant past performance history, how must evaluators rate the lack of information? Negotiations are exchanges in a competitive or sole source environment between the government and offerors that are undertaken with the intent of allowing the offeror to revise its offer. - Answer - Which statement is correct regarding negotiations? To obtain the best value for the government - Answer - What is the ultimate objective of negotiations? Interest-based negotiation is preferred style and involves obtaining a win/win outcome for both parties. - Answer - What statement is true regarding negotiation styles? To address adverse past performance information that an offeror has not had a previous opportunity to address - Answer - Communications are exchanges of information with offerors prior to establishment of the competitive range. What are communications used for? Limited exchanges that occur when the CO anticipates award without discussions - Answer - What are clarfications? All offerors in the competitive range - Answer - If discussions are held, who must they be held with? Those with the most highly rated proposals - Answer - Which offerors are included in the competitive range? Advising the offeror of deficiencies and significant weaknesses in its proposal - Answer - What activity is appropriate during discussions? FAR 8.4 - Answer - Which should be used when documenting the outcome of awards for Federal Supply Schedules? Evaluate them against the evaluation factors in the solicitation - Answer - When evaluating final proposal revisions, what should evaluators do? Award may be made to a higher-priced, technically superior proposal - Answer - When using the tradeoff approach to source selection, which of the following is correct? Responsibility - Answer - The CO has obtained information that a potential offeror does not have adequate financial resources to perform the contract or the ability to obtain them. What will this information be used to determine about the offeror? 3 - Answer - Within how many days after the date of contract award to the successful offeror must the government notify offerors whose proposals were included in the competitive range but not selected for award? -Names of individuals providing reference information about an offeror's past performance -Trade secrets - Answer - Which items cannot be discussed in a post-award debriefing? 3 - Answer - How many days do offerors have to request a post-award debriefing? Number of proposals received - Answer - What must a notification of award issued to unsuccessful offerors include? -Award decision -Solicitation terms - Answer - What can be protested? There is no time limit - Answer - What is the time limit to file a protest with the Court of Federal Claims? -Agency -Federal Court of Claims

Content preview

FAC-C Certification Exam (Actual) Exam
Rated A+
All non-price factors are evaluated on a pass/fail basis - Answer - ✔ Which of the
following statements is true regarding the lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA)
source selection approach?

Allow maximum flexibility in making tradeoffs among factors - Answer - ✔ The most
successful scoring or rating methods for tradeoffs:

Neither favorable or unfavorably based on past performance - Answer - ✔ If an offeror
lacks relevant past performance history, how must evaluators rate the lack of
information?

Negotiations are exchanges in a competitive or sole source environment between the
government and offerors that are undertaken with the intent of allowing the offeror to
revise its offer. - Answer - ✔ Which statement is correct regarding negotiations?

To obtain the best value for the government - Answer - ✔ What is the ultimate objective
of negotiations?

Interest-based negotiation is preferred style and involves obtaining a win/win outcome
for both parties. - Answer - ✔ What statement is true regarding negotiation styles?

To address adverse past performance information that an offeror has not had a
previous opportunity to address - Answer - ✔ Communications are exchanges of
information with offerors prior to establishment of the competitive range. What are
communications used for?

Limited exchanges that occur when the CO anticipates award without discussions -
Answer - ✔ What are clarfications?

All offerors in the competitive range - Answer - ✔ If discussions are held, who must they
be held with?

Those with the most highly rated proposals - Answer - ✔ Which offerors are included in
the competitive range?

Advising the offeror of deficiencies and significant weaknesses in its proposal - Answer -
✔ What activity is appropriate during discussions?

FAR 8.4 - Answer - ✔ Which should be used when documenting the outcome of awards
for Federal Supply Schedules?

, Evaluate them against the evaluation factors in the solicitation - Answer - ✔ When
evaluating final proposal revisions, what should evaluators do?

Award may be made to a higher-priced, technically superior proposal - Answer - ✔
When using the tradeoff approach to source selection, which of the following is correct?

Responsibility - Answer - ✔ The CO has obtained information that a potential offeror
does not have adequate financial resources to perform the contract or the ability to
obtain them. What will this information be used to determine about the offeror?

3 - Answer - ✔ Within how many days after the date of contract award to the successful
offeror must the government notify offerors whose proposals were included in the
competitive range but not selected for award?

-Names of individuals providing reference information about an offeror's past
performance

-Trade secrets - Answer - ✔ Which items cannot be discussed in a post-award
debriefing?

3 - Answer - ✔ How many days do offerors have to request a post-award debriefing?

Number of proposals received - Answer - ✔ What must a notification of award issued to
unsuccessful offerors include?

-Award decision

-Solicitation terms - Answer - ✔ What can be protested?

There is no time limit - Answer - ✔ What is the time limit to file a protest with the Court
of Federal Claims?

-Agency

-Federal Court of Claims

-Government Accountability Office (GAO) - Answer - ✔ Through which venues may a
firm protest an award decision?

After the solicitation is issued but before proposals are received - Answer - ✔ In order
for a firm to protest the terms of a solicitation, when must they do so?

Document information

Uploaded on
May 22, 2025
Number of pages
10
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$11.39

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
BrightByte
3.0
(3)
Sold
52
Followers
12
Items
3778
Last sold
2 weeks ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions