Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 203 pages
Exam (elaborations)

Fundamentals of Investments: Valuation and Management 9th Edition by Bradford D. Jordan, Thomas Miller & Steve Dolvin Solution Manual |ISBN: 9781260013979| Guide A+

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 203 pages

Fundamentals of Investments: Valuation and Management 9th Edition by Bradford D. Jordan, Thomas Miller & Steve Dolvin Solution Manual |ISBN: 9781260013979| Guide A+

Content preview

SOLUTION MANUAL FOR FUNDAMENTALS OF INVESTMENTS:
VALUATION & MANAGEMENT 9th EDITION BY JORDAN, MILLER
TE

& DOLVIN
S
TB
A N
KS
O
LU
TI
O
N
S

, Chapter 1-21
TE
Chapter 1
A Brief History of Risk and Return

Concept Questions
S
1. For both risk and return, increasing order is b, c, a, d. On average, the higher the risk of an
investment, the higher is its expected return.
TB
2. Since the price didn’t change, the capital gains yield was zero. If the total return was four percent,
then the dividend yield must be four percent.

3. It is impossible to lose more than –100 percent of your investment. Therefore, return distributions
are cut off on the lower tail at –100 percent; if returns were truly normally distributed, you could lose
A
much more.

4. To calculate an arithmetic return, you sum the returns and divide by the number of returns. As such,
N
arithmetic returns do not account for the effects of compounding (and, in particular, the effect of
volatility). Geometric returns do account for the effects of compounding and for changes in the base
used for each year’s calculation of returns. As an investor, the more important return of an asset is
KS
the geometric return.

5. Blume’s formula uses the arithmetic and geometric returns along with the number of observations to
approximate a holding period return. When predicting a holding period return, the arithmetic return
will tend to be too high and the geometric return will tend to be too low. Blume’s formula adjusts
these returns for different holding period expected returns.
O
6. T-bill rates were highest in the early eighties since inflation at the time was relatively high. As we
discuss in our chapter on interest rates, rates on T-bills will almost always be slightly higher than the
expected rate of inflation.
LU

7. Risk premiums are about the same regardless of whether we account for inflation. The reason is that
risk premiums are the difference between two returns, so inflation essentially nets out.

8. Returns, risk premiums, and volatility would all be lower than we estimated because aftertax returns
TI
are smaller than pretax returns.

9. We have seen that T-bills barely kept up with inflation before taxes. After taxes, investors in T-bills
actually lost ground (assuming anything other than a very low tax rate). Thus, an all T-bill strategy
O
will probably lose money in real dollars for a taxable investor.
N
S

, 10. It is important not to lose sight of the fact that the results we have discussed cover over 80 years,
well beyond the investing lifetime for most of us. There have been extended periods during which
small stocks have done terribly. Thus, one reason most investors will choose not to pursue a 100
TE
percent stock (particularly small-cap stocks) strategy is that many investors have relatively short
horizons, and high volatility investments may be very inappropriate in such cases. There are other
reasons, but we will defer discussion of these to later chapters.

Solutions to Questions and Problems
S
NOTE: All end of chapter problems were solved using a spreadsheet. Many problems require multiple
steps. Due to space and readability constraints, when these intermediate steps are included in this
solutions manual, rounding may appear to have occurred. However, the final answer for each problem is
TB
found without rounding during any step in the problem.

Core Questions

1. Total dollar return = 100($41 – $37 + $.28) = $428.00
A
Whether you choose to sell the stock does not affect the gain or loss for the year; your stock is worth
what it would bring if you sold it. Whether you choose to do so or not is irrelevant (ignoring
commissions and taxes).
N
2. Capital gains yield = ($41 – $37)/$37 = .1081, or 10.81%
Dividend yield = $.28/$37 = .0076, or .76%
KS
Total rate of return = 10.81% + .76% = 11.57%

3. Dollar return = 500($34 – $37 + $.28) = –$1,360
Capital gains yield = ($34 – $37)/$37 = –.0811, or –8.11%
Dividend yield = $.28/$37 = .0076, or .76%
Total rate of return = –8.11% + .76% = –7.35%
O
4. a. average return = 6.2%, average risk premium = 2.6%
b. average return = 3.6%, average risk premium = 0%
c. average return = 11.9%, average risk premium = 8.3%
LU
d. average return = 17.5%, average risk premium = 13.9%

5. Cherry average return = (17% + 11% – 2% + 3% + 14%)/5 = 8.60%
Straw average return = (16% + 18% – 6% + 1% + 22%)/5 = 10.20%

6. Cherry: RA = 8.60%
TI
Var = 1/4[(.17 – .086)2 + (.11 – .086)2 + (–.02 – .086)2 + (.03 – .086)2 + (.14 – .086)2] = .00623
Standard deviation = (.00623)1/2 = .0789, or 7.89%

Straw: RB = 10.20%
O
Var = 1/4[(.16 – .102)2 + (.18 – .102)2 + (–.06 – .102)2 + (.01 – .102)2 + (.22 – .102)2] = .01452
Standard deviation = (.01452)1/2 = .1205, or 12.05%
N
7. The capital gains yield is ($59 – $65)/$65 = –.0923, or –9.23% (notice the negative sign). With a
dividend yield of 1.2 percent, the total return is –8.03%.
S

, 8. Geometric return = [(1 + .17)(1 + .11)(1 - .02)(1 + .03)(1 + .14)](1/5) – 1 = .0837, or 8.37%

9. Arithmetic return = (.21 + .12 + .07 –.13 – .04 + .26)/6 = .0817, or 8.17%
TE
Geometric return = [(1 + .21)(1 + .12)(1 + .07)(1 – .13)(1 – .04)(1 + .26)](1/6) – 1 = .0730, or 7.30%

Intermediate Questions

10. That’s plus or minus one standard deviation, so about two-thirds of the time, or two years out of
three. In one year out of three, you will be outside this range, implying that you will be below it one
S
year out of six and above it one year out of six.

11. You lose money if you have a negative return. With a 12 percent expected return and a 6 percent
TB
standard deviation, a zero return is two standard deviations below the average. The odds of being
outside (above or below) two standard deviations are 5 percent; the odds of being below are half
that, or 2.5 percent. (It’s actually 2.28 percent.) You should expect to lose money only 2.5 years out
of every 100. It’s a pretty safe investment.
A
12. The average return is 5.9 percent, with a standard deviation of 9.8 percent, so Prob(Return < –3.9 or
Return > 15.7 ) ≈ 1/3, but we are only interested in one tail; Prob(Return < –3.9) ≈ 1/6, which is half
of 1/3 .
N
95%: 5.9 ± 2σ = 5.9 ± 2(9.8) = –13.7% to 25.5%
99%: 5.9 ± 3σ = 5.9 ± 3(9.8) = –23.5% to 35.3%
KS
13. Expected return = 17.5%; σ = 36.3%. Doubling your money is a 100% return, so if the return
distribution is normal, Z = (100 – 17.5)/36.3 = 2.27 standard deviations; this is in-between two and
three standard deviations, so the probability is small, somewhere between .5% and 2.5% (why?).
Referring to the nearest Z table, the actual probability is = 1.152%, or about once every 100 years.
Tripling your money would be Z = (200 – 17.5)/36.3 = 5.028 standard deviations; this corresponds to
a probability of (much) less than 0.5%, or once every 200 years. (The actual answer is less than once
O
every 1 million years, so don’t hold your breath.)

14. Year Common stocks T-bill return Risk premium
1973 –14.69% 7.29% –21.98%
LU
1974 –26.47% 7.99% –34.46%
1975 37.23% 5.87% 31.36%
1796 23.93% 5.07% 18.86%
1977 –7.16% 5.45% –12.61%
sum 12.84% 31.67% –18.83%
TI
a. Annual risk premium = Common stock return – T-bill return (see table above).
b. Average returns: Common stocks = 12.84/5 = .0257, or 2.57%; T-bills = 31.67/5 = .0633, or
6.33%;
Risk premium = –18.83/5 = –.0377, or –3.77%
O
c. Common stocks: Var = 1/4[ (–.1469 – .0257)2 + (–.2647 – .0257)2 + (.3723 – .0257)2 +
(.2393 – .0257)2 + (–.0716 – .0257)2] = .072337
Standard deviation = (0.072337)1/2 = .2690, or 26.90%
N
T-bills: Var = 1/4[(.0729 – .0633)2 + (.0799 – .0633)2 + (.0587 – .0633)2 + (.0507–.0633)2 +
(.0545 – .0633)2] = .000156
Standard deviation = (.000156)1/2 = .0125, or 1.25%
S

Connected book
 image
Bradford D. Jordan, Thomas W. Miller, Steven D. Dolvin Fundamentals of Investments
Publisher: 2020 ISBN: 9781260013979 Edition: Unknown

Document information

Uploaded on
May 21, 2025
Number of pages
203
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$20.49

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Sold
56
Followers
2
Items
359
Last sold
1 week ago


Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions