Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary W10 & 11 FINAL NOTES - DISPUTE RESOLUTION - MARCH 2024 - CIVIL LITIGATION

Rating
-
Sold
1
Pages
8
Uploaded on
06-08-2020
Written in
2023/2024

Exam Ready Notes for CORE Module 'Dispute Resolution'! Civil Litigation Notes for Workshops 10 and 11 of the Dispute Resolution Module on the Legal Practice Course (LPC) at the University of Law. These notes were used for the March 2023 exams, where I achieved a Distinction! SEE THE BUNDLE PURCHASE FOR MORE NOTES AT A CHEAPER PRICE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION NOTES!

Show more Read less
Institution
Course

Content preview

DR WS 10 & 11

Evidence
2 broad types:
1) Factual evidence from a witness
2) Expert evidence from a suitably qualified expert



Witness evidence

r32.4(1): A witness statement is a signed statement of the evidence the witness would be allowed to give orally if
called to do so.
 The court can control which evidence is admissible, on which issues, how it is presented before the court and to what
extent it may be cross-examined by giving specific directions, limited in cross examination etc. r32.1
 Any fact which needs to be proved is to be proved at trial by way of oral evidence in writing (and at any other hearing in
writing) r32.1(1)
 Witnesses can give evidence by any means (video link is common) r32.1
 Stage 1 – what evidence is admissible?
 Stage 2 – how should it be formatted?

STAGE 1: What evidence is admissible?
Relevant  Only relevant evidence is admissible: O’Brian v CC South Wales Police

Not  Generally, opinion evidence will be inadmissible.
opinion o This is because the function of a witness is to relay facts; it is then for the court to draw its own conclusions
from these facts. So, statements such as, “he was an idiot” would be inadmissible. It is for the court to draw
that conclusion.
 Exceptions:
o s3(2) of the Civil Evidence Act 1972 makes clear that it is admissible to give evidence which amounts to a
‘personal perception of facts’
 E.g. speed; if the witness states the vehicle was driving at “about 60 mph”, this is only an opinion,
but it is a perception of a fact and so may be admissible.
o s3(1) of the Civil Evidence Act 1972 provides that a witnesses’ opinion “on any relevant matter on which he is
qualified to give expert evidence shall be admissible in evidence”. Therefore, expert witnesses CAN give
opinions – when called as a witness, not hearsay
o In professional negligence claims, a defendant is allowed to give his own expert opinion on what he did or
did not do which is said to amount to negligence in his witness statement.

Hearsay evidence
Oral or written statement made outside the courtroom repeated to the court in order to prove the truth of the matter stated in court
 “Hearsay”: s1(2)(a) of the Civil Evidence Act 1995
Step 1: o A statement (oral or written – any representation of fact or opinion) made other than by a person while
Define giving oral evidence in the proceedings (made outside the court room) which is tendered as evidence of the
hearsay matters stated (presented to court to show that it is true, not just that it was made)
and
statement  Hearsay is a therefore statement made:
 Outside of the court,
 Which is repeated to the court
 In order to prove the truth of the matter stated out of court

E.g. Louise arrives later home to find her house burgled. A passer-by she doesn’t know tells her ‘I saw three boys in
their late teens running down the street five minutes ago. They were yobs. One of them was carrying a TV’  The
statement was made by a third party outside court and is repeated in court by Louise to prove the truth of it (that
boys were running away from scene, not that the passer-by told her so).




1

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
August 6, 2020
Number of pages
8
Written in
2023/2024
Type
SUMMARY

Subjects

$8.90
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF


Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
lpcnotes2024 University of Law
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
568
Member since
6 year
Number of followers
349
Documents
104
Last sold
11 months ago
LPC notes for University of Law, BPP Law School and City, University of London Law School

4.4

114 reviews

5
74
4
26
3
7
2
1
1
6

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions