Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 13 pages
Exam (elaborations)

Agile mock test - Mock Exam 3 with Complete Solutions

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 13 pages

Agile mock test - Mock Exam 3 with Complete Solutions

Content preview

Agile mock test - Mock Exam 3 with
Complete Solutions

A key influence on cycle time is the variability in the time it takes to develop a new
feature. One of the best ways to reduce variability is to:
A. Work with reasonable small and similarly-sized stories.
B. Cycle time variability is inevitable and cannot be reduced.
C. Grouping relates stories into themes and prioritizing based on theme desirability.
D. Decomposing stories into tasks and estimating tasks instead of estimating stories. -
ANS-A. Work with reasonable small and similarly-sized stories.

Explanation
A - A key influence on cycle time is the variability in the time it takes to develop a new
feature. One of the best ways to reduce variability is to work with reasonable small and
similarly-sized units of work. Working at the task level can further reduce the variability
but compromise the Agile principles. Agile approaches are focused at the feature or
story level. [Cohn, M., 2006. Agile Estimating and Planning. 1st ed. Massachusetts:
Pearson Education. Page 246] [Problem Detection and Resolution]

A task included in an iteration plan that is being undertaken specifically to gain
knowledge or answer a question is known as:
A. Workaround
B. Epic
C. Spike
D. Sprint - ANS-C. Spike

Explanation
C - A spike is a task included in an iteration plan that is being undertaken specifically to
gain knowledge or answer a question. [Cohn, M., 2006. Agile Estimating and Planning.
1st ed. Massachusetts: Pearson Education. Page 154] [Continuous Improvement]

Agile teams usually limit their estimation to the next few week because:
A. Planning for shorter time periods eliminates multi-tasking.
B. Planning for shorter time periods is more accurate.
C. Planning for shorter time periods is easier.
D. Planning for shorter time periods results in higher ROI. - ANS-B. Planning for shorter
time periods is more accurate.

Explanation
B - Planning for shorter time periods do not have any direct relationship with a project's
ROI or multi-tasking. Although planning for shorter time periods is easier, this is not the

, reason why Agile teams plan for the next few weeks at the most. Planning for shorter
time periods is more accurate because work for the next few weeks is more predictable.
There is evidence, that the smaller the chunk of work, the more likely people are to
deliver it. [Agile Practice Guide, 1st edition, Page 61] [Adaptive Planning]

How do Agile approaches produce a more valuable product without formal change
control procedures?
A. By relying on the Agile teams to deliver a higher quality product.
B. By establishing self-managed teams who are capable of making changes
themselves.
C. By delivering in increments and incorporating feedback into future work.
D. By relying on the Agile coach to ensure the product meets all quality standards. -
ANS-C. By delivering in increments and incorporating feedback into future work.

Explanation
C - With an Agile approach to estimating and planning, teams reduce uncertainty about
the product ultimately being built as product increments are shown to potential users
and other stakeholders at the end of each iteration. Their feedback and responses are
used to fine-tune future plans. [Cohn, M., 2006. Agile Estimating and Planning. 1st ed.
Massachusetts: Pearson Education. Page 247] [Value-driven Delivery]

If $250,000 is invested at 8% with annual compounding. How much will this money be
worth in 15 years?
A. 78810
B. 1000000
C. 793042
D. 550000 - ANS-C. 793042

Explanation
C - You need to calculate the Future Value of 250,000 at 8% for 15 years. The formula
for Future Value is FV = PV * (1+r)^n. So to calculate, FV = 250,000 * (1 + 0.08)^15 =
$793,042. [Cohn, M., 2006. Agile Estimating and Planning. 1st ed. Massachusetts:
Pearson Education. Page 100] [Value-driven Delivery]

In Agile settings, what is the ideal frequency for conducting product demonstrations?
A. The ideal frequency for conducting product demonstrations is three weeks.
B. The ideal frequency for conducting product demonstrations is two weeks.
C. The ideal frequency for conducting product demonstrations is one week.
D. There is no ideal frequency, but rather a general guideline of conducting
demonstrations at least once every two weeks. - ANS-D. There is no ideal frequency,
but rather a general guideline of conducting demonstrations at least once every two
weeks.

Explanation

Document information

Uploaded on
March 25, 2025
Number of pages
13
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$12.49

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Sold
2
Followers
1
Items
855
Last sold
3 months ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions