LCP4807 Assignment 2 (100% COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 - DUE 29 April 2025; 100% correct solutions and explanations. {Four Answers Provided}

LCP4807 Assignment 2 (100% COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 - DUE 29 April 2025; 100% correct solutions and explanations. {Four Answers Provided}The Republic of Qwanza is a Southern African country with a constitution which is a replica of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) adopted in 2004. Qwanza has ratified the major UN human rights instruments such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR); the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) (including the two optional protocols), International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) including its optional Protocols. Qwanza has also ratified the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights; The Protocol Establishing the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights. On 15 May 2022 a man was murdered near Bali village in the Republic of Qwanza. Mr Timothy Ibo was accused of committing the crime and brought to trial. He denied the offence. On 15 June 2023 the High Court in Qwanza convicted him of the murder and sentenced him to death, the only sentence available for the offence of murder under Qwanza law. According to Section 46 of the 1960 Criminal and Other Offences Act of Qwanza “a person who commits murder is liable to suffer death.” Mr Ibo claims that the death sentence as provided for in the Criminal and Other Offences Act is unconstitutional and violates several human rights as provided for in the Constitution of Qwanza as well as international human rights instruments that Qwanza has ratified. He then appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeal and challenged the conviction and sentence. On 16 March 2024 the Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal both on the conviction and sentence. Mr Ibo further appealed both the conviction and sentence to the Constitutional Court which is the highest court in Qwanza. In November 2024, the Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal against the conviction and rejected the merits of Mr Ibo’s challenge to the