HOPEACADEMY
CUS3701
ASSESSMENT 02
DUE 20 JUNE 2025
2025
QUESTION 1: Curriculum approaches
Different approaches to curriculum are crucial for sound curriculum implementation for
several reasons. These approaches allow teachers to cater to learners' diverse learning
needs, provide flexibility and adaptability in teaching methods and content delivery, and
provide a comprehensive approach to education. Referring to the learner-centred approach
of Lawrence Stenhouse and the behavioural approach of John Bobbitt, analyse and compare
their ideas in terms of:
1.1 The theoretical foundations of the approaches. (5)
0 7 6 4 0 3 1 2 2 9
,CUS3701 ASSESSMENT 02
QUESTION 1: Curriculum approaches
Different approaches to curriculum are crucial for sound curriculum
implementation for several reasons. These approaches allow teachers
to cater to learners' diverse learning needs, provide flexibility and
adaptability in teaching methods and content delivery, and provide a
comprehensive approach to education. Referring to the learner-centred
approach of Lawrence Stenhouse and the behavioural approach of John
Bobbitt, analyse and compare their ideas in terms of:
1.1 The theoretical foundations of the approaches. (5)
Lawrence Stenhouse and John Bobbitt are two influential educators
who proposed distinct approaches to curriculum design. This essay
compares and analyses their ideas, focusing on the theoretical
foundations of their approaches.
Theoretical Foundations
Stenhouse's learner-centred approach is rooted in the progressive
education movement, emphasizing student autonomy, curiosity, and
creativity (Stenhouse, 1975). He believed that learners should be
actively engaged in the learning process, and that teachers should
facilitate rather than direct learning.
, In contrast, Bobbitt's behavioural approach is based on the theory of
behaviourism, which focuses on observable behaviour and measurable
outcomes (Bobbitt, 1918). He argued that education should be focused
on developing specific skills and habits, and that teachers should use
scientific methods to design and evaluate curriculum.
In conclusion, the theoretical foundations of Stenhouse's learner-
centred approach and Bobbitt's behavioural approach differ
significantly. While Stenhouse emphasizes student autonomy and
creativity, Bobbitt focuses on observable behaviour and measurable
outcomes.
References:
Bobbitt, J. F. (1918). The curriculum. Houghton Mifflin.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and
development. Heinemann.
1.2 The practical implications for teachers. (5)
Lawrence Stenhouse's learner-centred approach and John Bobbitt's
behavioural approach have distinct practical implications for teachers.
Stenhouse's Learner-Centred Approach
CUS3701
ASSESSMENT 02
DUE 20 JUNE 2025
2025
QUESTION 1: Curriculum approaches
Different approaches to curriculum are crucial for sound curriculum implementation for
several reasons. These approaches allow teachers to cater to learners' diverse learning
needs, provide flexibility and adaptability in teaching methods and content delivery, and
provide a comprehensive approach to education. Referring to the learner-centred approach
of Lawrence Stenhouse and the behavioural approach of John Bobbitt, analyse and compare
their ideas in terms of:
1.1 The theoretical foundations of the approaches. (5)
0 7 6 4 0 3 1 2 2 9
,CUS3701 ASSESSMENT 02
QUESTION 1: Curriculum approaches
Different approaches to curriculum are crucial for sound curriculum
implementation for several reasons. These approaches allow teachers
to cater to learners' diverse learning needs, provide flexibility and
adaptability in teaching methods and content delivery, and provide a
comprehensive approach to education. Referring to the learner-centred
approach of Lawrence Stenhouse and the behavioural approach of John
Bobbitt, analyse and compare their ideas in terms of:
1.1 The theoretical foundations of the approaches. (5)
Lawrence Stenhouse and John Bobbitt are two influential educators
who proposed distinct approaches to curriculum design. This essay
compares and analyses their ideas, focusing on the theoretical
foundations of their approaches.
Theoretical Foundations
Stenhouse's learner-centred approach is rooted in the progressive
education movement, emphasizing student autonomy, curiosity, and
creativity (Stenhouse, 1975). He believed that learners should be
actively engaged in the learning process, and that teachers should
facilitate rather than direct learning.
, In contrast, Bobbitt's behavioural approach is based on the theory of
behaviourism, which focuses on observable behaviour and measurable
outcomes (Bobbitt, 1918). He argued that education should be focused
on developing specific skills and habits, and that teachers should use
scientific methods to design and evaluate curriculum.
In conclusion, the theoretical foundations of Stenhouse's learner-
centred approach and Bobbitt's behavioural approach differ
significantly. While Stenhouse emphasizes student autonomy and
creativity, Bobbitt focuses on observable behaviour and measurable
outcomes.
References:
Bobbitt, J. F. (1918). The curriculum. Houghton Mifflin.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and
development. Heinemann.
1.2 The practical implications for teachers. (5)
Lawrence Stenhouse's learner-centred approach and John Bobbitt's
behavioural approach have distinct practical implications for teachers.
Stenhouse's Learner-Centred Approach
