Fundamentals of Corporate Finance, 13th Edition TEST BANK by Ross, Westerfield, Verified Chapters 1 - 27, Complete Newest Version

Solutions Manual Fundamentals of Corporate Finance
13th Edition Ross, Westerfield, and Jordan
Chapters 1 - 27

,CHAPTER 1: Introduction to Corporate Finance
yb yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 2: Financial Statements, Taxes, And Cash Flow
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 3: Working with Financial Statements
yb yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 4: Long-Term Financial Planning and Growth
yb yb yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 5: Introduction to Valuation: The Time Value of Money
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 6: Discounted Cash Flow Valuation
yb yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 7: Interest Rates and Bond Valuation
yb yb yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 8: Stock Valuation
yb yb yb




CHAPTER 9: Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 10: Making Capital Investment Decisions
yb yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 11: Project Analysis and Evaluation
yb yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 12: Some Lessons from Capital Market History
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 13: Return, Risk, And the Security Market Line
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 14: Cost of Capital
yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 15: Raising Capital
yb yb yb




CHAPTER 16: Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 17: Dividends and Payout Policy
yb yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 18: Short-Term Finance and Planning
yb yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 19: Cash and Liquidity Management
yb yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 20: Credit and Inventory Management
yb yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 21: International Corporate Finance
yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 22: Behavioral Finance: Implications for Financial Manage
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 23: Enterprise Risk Management
yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 24:Options and Corporate Finance
yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 25: Option Valuation
yb yb yb




CHAPTER 26: Mergers and Acquisitions
yb yb yb yb




CHAPTER 27: Leasing
yb yb

,CHAPTER 1 yb




INTRODUCTION TO CORPORATE yb yb b
y




FINANCE
Answers to Concepts Review and Critical Thinking Questions
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb




1. Capital budgeting (deciding whether to expand a manufacturing plant), capital structure (deciding w
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



hether to issue new equity and use the proceeds to retire outstanding debt), and working capital man
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



agement (modifying the firm’s credit collection policy with its customers).
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb




2. Disadvantages: unlimited liability, limited life, difficulty in transferring ownership, hard to raise cap
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



ital funds. Some advantages: simpler, less regulation, the owners are also the managers, sometimes
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



personal tax rates are better than corporate tax rates.
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb




3. The primary disadvantage of the corporate form is the double taxation to shareholders of distributed
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb y



earnings and dividends. Some advantages include: limited liability, ease of transferability, ability to
b yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



raise capital, unlimited life, and so forth.
yb yb yb yb yb yb




4. In response to Sarbanes-
yb yb yb



Oxley, small firms have elected to go dark because of the costs of compliance. The costs to comply
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



with Sarbox can be several million dollars, which can be a large percentage of a small firms profi
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb y b yb yb y b yb



ts. A major cost of going dark is less access to capital. Since thefirm is no longer publicly tra
yb yb yb yb y b yb yb yb y b y b yb yb y b b
y yb yb yb yb yb



ded, it can no longer raise money in the public market. Although the company will still have access
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



to bank loans and the private equity market, the costs associated with raising funds in these markets
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



are usually higher than the costs of raising funds in the public market.
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb




5. The treasurer’s office and the controller’s office are the two primary organizational grou
y b y b y b y b y b y b y b y b y b y b y b y b



ps thatreport directly to the chief financial officer. The controller’s office handles cost and financia
y b b
y yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



laccounting, tax management, and management information systems, while the treasurer’s office is r
b
y yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



esponsible for cash and credit management, capital budgeting, and financial planning. Theref
y b y b y b y b y b y b yb y b y b y b y b



ore,the study of corporate finance is concentrated within the treasury group’s functions.
b
y yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb




6. To maximize the current market value (share price) of the equity of the firm (whether it’s publicly-
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



traded or not).
yb yb yb




7. In the corporate form of ownership, the shareholders are the owners of the firm. The shareholders el
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



ect the directors of the corporation, who in turn appoint the firm’s management. This separation of o
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



wnership from control in the corporate form of organization is what causes agency problems to exist
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



. Management may act in its own or someone else’s best interests, rather than those of the sharehold
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



ers. If such events occur, they may contradict the goal of maximizing the share price of the equity o
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



f the firm.
yb yb




8. A primary market transaction.
yb yb yb

, B-2 SOLUTIONS
y b




9. In auction markets like the NYSE, brokers and agents meet at a physical location (the exchange) to
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



match buyers and sellers of assets. Dealer markets like NASDAQ consist of dealers operating at dis
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



persed locales who buy and sell assets themselves, communicating with other dealers either electron
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



ically or literally over-the-counter.
yb yb yb




10. Such organizations frequently pursue social or political missions, so many different goals are concei
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



vable. One goal that is often cited is revenue minimization; i.e., provide whatever goods and service
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



s are offered at the lowest possible cost to society. A better approach might be to observe that even
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



a not-for- yb



profit business has equity. Thus, one answer is that the appropriate goal is to maximize the value o
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb y b yb yb yb yb


f the equity.
yb yb




11. Presumably, the current stock value reflects the risk, timing, and magnitude of all future cash flows,
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb y



both short-term and long-term. If this is correct, then the statement is false.
b yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb




12. An argument can be made either way. At the one extreme, we could argue that in a market economy
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



,all of these things are priced. There is thus an optimal level of, for example, ethical and/or illegal b
b
y yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



ehavior, and the framework of stock valuation explicitly includes these. At the other extreme, we co
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



uld argue that these are non-
yb yb yb yb yb



economic phenomena and are best handled through the political process. A classic (and highly relev
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb


ant) thought question that illustrates this debate goes something like this: “A firm has estimated that
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb y



the cost of improving the safety of one of its products is $30 million. However, the firm believes th
b yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



at improving the safety of the product will only save $20 million in product liability claims. What s
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



hould the firm do?” yb yb yb




13. The goal will be the same, but the best course of action toward that goal may be different because o
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



f differing social, political, and economic institutions.
yb yb yb yb yb yb




14. The goal of management should be to maximize the share price for the current shareholders. If man
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



agement believes that it can improve the profitability of the firm so that the share price will exceed
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



$35, then they should fight the offer from the outside company. If management believes that this bid
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



der or other unidentified bidders will actually pay more than $35 per share to acquire the company, t
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



hen they should still fight the offer. However, if the current management cannot increase the value o
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



f the firm beyond the bid price, and no other higher bids come in, then management is not acting in
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



the interests of the shareholders by fighting the offer. Since current managers often lose their jobs w
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



hen the corporation is acquired, poorly monitored managers have an incentive to fight corporate tak
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



eovers in situations such as this. yb yb yb yb yb




15. We would expect agency problems to be less severe in other countries, primarily due to the relativel
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



ysmall percentage of individual ownership. Fewer individual owners should reduce the number of di
b
y yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



verse opinions concerning corporate goals. The high percentage of institutional ownership might lea
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



d to a higher degree of agreement between owners and managers on decisions concerning risky proj
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



ects. In addition, institutions may be better able to implement effective monitoring mechanisms on
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



managers than can individual owners, based on the institutions’ deeper resources and experiences w
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



ith their own management. The increase in institutional ownership of stock in the United States andt
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



he growing activism of these large shareholder groups may lead to a reduction in agency problems f
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb



or U.S. corporations and a more efficient market for corporate control.
yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb yb