• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 7 pages
Summary

Summary Literature week 3

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 7 pages

This is a summary of all the literature of week 3 of the course Financial Management.

Content preview

Literature week 3 – Financial Management

Young, D. (2014) Management Accounting in Health Care Organizations
Chapter 6 – responsibility accounting: an overview
Accounting staff prepare financial statements for use by outsiders and cost analyses for use
by line and senior managers. Also undertake ad hoc analyses for use in making alternative
choice decisions. Next to this, a third kind of accounting information assists management in
making decisions: information generated via the responsibility accounting system (i.e.
management control system). This information focuses on the costs (sometimes revenues)
that are controllable by various managers and are their responsibility.

A responsibility accounting system (RAS) is concerned with planning and controlling rather
than measuring the organization’s resources. Responsibility center: an organizational unit
headed by a manager charged with achieving certain agreed-upon results (they are
responsible for this). Key issues is how senior management will measure the group’s
financial performance. Responsibility accounting system is focuses on the managers who are
responsible for controlling the use of those resources. It requires senior management to
establish a network of responsibility centers. So you’d look at the individuals who control
resources. In cost accounting on the other hand, one looks at the specific resources used.




Effectiveness: accomplishing what the organization wants to do. Efficiency: accomplishing
something at low cost (ratio of outputs to inputs). Goal of a RAS is to ensure the effective
and efficient use of an organisation’s resources. There is variety in RAS’s of different
organisations. This is due to the difference in the amount of autonomy and flexibility that

1

, senior management gives to lower-level managers. Although there is not one single correct
way to design a RAS, managers find RAS principles useful in designing systems to assist the
organization with its planning and control activities. Contingency theory – the form of the
organization should fit with its’ environment. The type of RAS is heavily dependent on how
it is embedded into its organizational context.

Each responsibility center (a laboratory, sales office, department etc.) generally exists of an
aggregation of smaller responsibility centers. Five main types of responsibility centers:
- Revenue centers: manager’s financial performance measured in terms of the amount
of revenue earned by that center.
- Standard expense centers: financial performance measured by a flexible budget. The
computation for the flexible budget can be made more precise by dividing the
department’s expenses into their fixed and variable components. With this method
only the variable components are flexed; the fixed components remain at their
budgeted levels as long as the volume is within the relevant range. Flexible budget is
the actual units used x variable cost per unit. Then the total of that plus total fixed
costs makes for the total budget.
- Discretionary expense centers: FP measured in terms of total expenses incurred by
the center regardless of how much output the center produces. No easy way to
measure unit of output, so usually receive a fixed budget which the manager needs
to adhere to in the time period.
- Profit centers: FP measured in terms of total revenues of the center – total expenses.
- Investment centers: FP measured in terms of the total revenues – expenses, as % of
the assets used (so the ROA).




Senior management determines the best formal organizational structure, which is a
prerequisite to designing the network of responsibility centers. This design is very
important, as it facilities the organisation’s ability to achieve its goals. Without it this might
not be achieveable. Everyone needs to know their role and responsibility. Incentives must
be given too, senior management must design an appropriate motivation process for
rewarding good performance.



2

Document information

Study
Uploaded on
April 16, 2020
Number of pages
7
Written in
2018/2019
Type
Summary
$5.76

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
jelena-k
2.9
(18)
Sold
67
Followers
35
Items
82
Last sold
3 year ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions