BLAW 3201 LSU Fry Test 1 Case Studies Exam Q&A 100% Solved | Graded A+

BLAW 3201 LSU Fry Test 1 Case Studies

Exam Q&A 100% Solved | Graded A+


Ryan vs. Friesenhahn

Plaintiff-

Defendant- - ✔✔Plaintiff- Ryan Family

Defendant- Friesenhahn Family

Ryan vs. Friesenhahn

The summary judgement was reversed and case remanded to the trial

court

Appeal- - ✔✔Ryan Family

Ryan vs. Friesenhahn

Decision - ✔✔In favor of Ryan family, Friesenhahn's were aware of the

minors consuming alcohol which made them liable

Mims vs. Arrow Financial Services, LLC

Plaintiff

Defendant - ✔✔Plaintiff- Marcus D. Mims

Defendant- Arrow Financial Services, LLC

1
©JOSHCLAY 2024/2025. YEAR PUBLISHED 2024.

, Mims vs. Arrow Financial Services, LLC

judgement was reversed in favor of the Mims, was a federal law case

Appeal- - ✔✔Marcus Mims

Mims vs. Arrow Financial Services, LLC

Decision - ✔✔in favor of the mims, mims had the ability to hold the case in

federal court under the TCPA

World-Wide Volkswagen vs. Woodson

Plaintiff

Defendant - ✔✔Plaintiff- Robinson Family

Defendant- Audi, world- wide volkswage, seaway

World-Wide Volkswagen vs. Woodson

Supreme court of Oklahoma held personal jurisdiction over petitions was

authorized by Oklahoma "long-arm" statute

Appeal- - ✔✔Audi, world-wide volkswagen, seaway

World-Wide Volkswagen vs. Woodson

Decision - ✔✔supreme court rules that the defendants had no "contact, ties

or relations" with the state of Oklahoma (where the accident occurred)

Judgement of Supreme Court was reversed to that

Shirley Parker vs. 20th century fox


2
©JOSHCLAY 2024/2025. YEAR PUBLISHED 2024.