Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 23 pages
Exam (elaborations)

PHI 115 Exam 1- InQuizitive Practice Questions and Answers 100% Solved

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 23 pages

PHI 115 Exam 1- InQuizitive Practice Questions and Answers 100% Solved Is it possible to evaluate a moral theory rationally? - yes How do you evaluate a moral theory rationally? - by using plausible criteria of adequacy Framing someone for a crime they didn't commit is an example of punishing the innocent. Why is one justified in believing that such and act is wrong? - because it is self-evident In order to even be eligible for evaluation, a moral theory must first meet a minimum standard. What makes up that minimum standard? - it must be coherent What is demonstrated by comparing "applying the criteria of adequacy" and "a doctor diagnosing an illness"? - there is no set formula for how to apply the criteria of adequacy, that doesn't mean applying those criteria is subjective

Content preview

©NINJANERD 2024/2025. YEAR PUBLISHED 2024.

PHI 115 Exam 1- InQuizitive Practice

Questions and Answers 100% Solved


Is it possible to evaluate a moral theory rationally? - ✔✔yes

How do you evaluate a moral theory rationally? - ✔✔by using plausible

criteria of adequacy

Framing someone for a crime they didn't commit is an example of

punishing the innocent. Why is one justified in believing that such and act is

wrong? - ✔✔because it is self-evident

In order to even be eligible for evaluation, a moral theory must first meet a

minimum standard. What makes up that minimum standard? - ✔✔it must

be coherent

What is demonstrated by comparing "applying the criteria of adequacy" and

"a doctor diagnosing an illness"? - ✔✔there is no set formula for how to

apply the criteria of adequacy, that doesn't mean applying those criteria is

subjective

,©NINJANERD 2024/2025. YEAR PUBLISHED 2024.

When philosophers reflect on morality, they try to achieve reflective

equilibrium. How would they know they have achieved it? - ✔✔when there

is as much agreement and coherence as possible between considered

moral judgements and moral theory

One criterion for evaluating scientific theories is conservatism: how well a

theory fits with what scientist already know. This is similar to the criterion of

adequacy called: - ✔✔consistency with considered moral judgements

TRUE or FALSE

One's considered moral judgements can be mistaken. - ✔✔true

TRUE or FALSE

Ethical egoism says that the morally right action is the one that produces

the most favorable balance of good over evil for oneself. - ✔✔true

Which actions does divine command theory say are morally right? -

✔✔actions that God commands

TRUE or FALSE

A moral theory that is internally inconsistent is not eligible for further

evaluation - ✔✔true

TRUE or FALSE

Moral agents can be mistaken about their moral experience - ✔✔true

, ©NINJANERD 2024/2025. YEAR PUBLISHED 2024.

TRUE or FALSE

If a moral belief such as "Equals should be treated equally" is self-evident,

then we can be confident that is true, unless we find good evidence against

it - ✔✔true

TRUE or FALSE

To a nonconsequentialist, telling a lie is wrong primarily because it results

in bad consequences - ✔✔false

TRUE or FALSE

A fact of one's moral experience that occasionally one has moral

disagreements - ✔✔true

TRUE or FALSE

A moral theory is equivalent to a moral code - ✔✔false

What best describes the relationship between a moral theory and

considered moral judgements? - ✔✔a moral theory is shaped by

considered moral judgements and can help adjudicate conflicts among

those judgements and other moral statements

Kant stresses the point that it is wrong for us to interfere with other person's

autonomous actions. This implies that all persons have: - ✔✔negative

rights

Document information

Uploaded on
November 1, 2024
Number of pages
23
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$12.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
NinjaNerd
3.4
(76)
Sold
401
Followers
6
Items
15471
Last sold
3 hours ago


Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions