C. J Chapter 5 Q&A GRADE A
A "knowing waiver" of rights requires that the defendant be able to understand the
consequences of not invoking the Miranda rights - (correct answer)True
The U.S. Supreme Court established the public safety exception to the Miranda rule in
New York v. Quarles - (correct answer)True
The sole condition for an emergency warrantless search is a probable cause to believe
that
there is an emergency threat of destruction of evidence. - (correct answer)False
Rights are concerned with procedure, that is, with how police and other actors in the
criminal
justice system handle each part of the process of dealing with suspects. - (correct
answer)True
Harris v. U.S. sets out the plain-view doctrine. - (correct answer)True
Evidence seized by police officers who are proceeding on a warrant but violate the
knock-and-announce rule will be subject to the exclusionary rule - (correct answer)False
In the 1960s, the US Supreme Court accelerated the process of guaranteeing individual
rights in the face of criminal prosecution - (correct answer)True
According to the verdict in U.S. v. Irizarry, the plain-view doctrine applies if officers move
objects so they can see evidence otherwise hidden from view - (correct answer)False
In Richards v. Wisconsin, the Supreme Court favored "no knock" entry when the police
have a reasonable suspicion that knocking and announcing their presence would be
dangerous or futile - (correct answer)True
, Probable cause is the minimum standard necessary for an arrest under any
circumstance - (correct answer)True
Police officers may enter a home to conduct a warrantless search even if one of the
residents does not give permission - (correct answer)False
Officers are usually required to submit an affidavit demonstrating probable cause to a
magistrate or prosecutor in order to obtain an arrest warrant - (correct answer)True
Supreme court rulings prohibit officers from searching arrestees of the opposite sex -
(correct answer)False
In Illinois v. Caballes, the US Supreme Court has held that the use of a drug-sniffing dog
during a routine and lawful traffic stop is permissible and may not even be a search
within the meaning of the fourth amendment - (correct answer)True
In 2006 the USA PATRIOT Act was repealed. - (correct answer)False
In California v. Hodari D., the court ruled that suspects who flee from officers and throw
away evidence as they retreat may be arrested based on the nature of the abandoned
evidence - (correct answer)True
Officers need to provide Miranda warnings only in situations involving both arrest and
custodial interrogation - (correct answer)True
Warrantless searches of a vehicle are permitted if officers have probable cause to
believe contraband is present - (correct answer)True
In technical terms, an arrest occurs whenever a law-enforcement officer restricts a
person's freedom to leave - (correct answer)True
A "knowing waiver" of rights requires that the defendant be able to understand the
consequences of not invoking the Miranda rights - (correct answer)True
The U.S. Supreme Court established the public safety exception to the Miranda rule in
New York v. Quarles - (correct answer)True
The sole condition for an emergency warrantless search is a probable cause to believe
that
there is an emergency threat of destruction of evidence. - (correct answer)False
Rights are concerned with procedure, that is, with how police and other actors in the
criminal
justice system handle each part of the process of dealing with suspects. - (correct
answer)True
Harris v. U.S. sets out the plain-view doctrine. - (correct answer)True
Evidence seized by police officers who are proceeding on a warrant but violate the
knock-and-announce rule will be subject to the exclusionary rule - (correct answer)False
In the 1960s, the US Supreme Court accelerated the process of guaranteeing individual
rights in the face of criminal prosecution - (correct answer)True
According to the verdict in U.S. v. Irizarry, the plain-view doctrine applies if officers move
objects so they can see evidence otherwise hidden from view - (correct answer)False
In Richards v. Wisconsin, the Supreme Court favored "no knock" entry when the police
have a reasonable suspicion that knocking and announcing their presence would be
dangerous or futile - (correct answer)True
, Probable cause is the minimum standard necessary for an arrest under any
circumstance - (correct answer)True
Police officers may enter a home to conduct a warrantless search even if one of the
residents does not give permission - (correct answer)False
Officers are usually required to submit an affidavit demonstrating probable cause to a
magistrate or prosecutor in order to obtain an arrest warrant - (correct answer)True
Supreme court rulings prohibit officers from searching arrestees of the opposite sex -
(correct answer)False
In Illinois v. Caballes, the US Supreme Court has held that the use of a drug-sniffing dog
during a routine and lawful traffic stop is permissible and may not even be a search
within the meaning of the fourth amendment - (correct answer)True
In 2006 the USA PATRIOT Act was repealed. - (correct answer)False
In California v. Hodari D., the court ruled that suspects who flee from officers and throw
away evidence as they retreat may be arrested based on the nature of the abandoned
evidence - (correct answer)True
Officers need to provide Miranda warnings only in situations involving both arrest and
custodial interrogation - (correct answer)True
Warrantless searches of a vehicle are permitted if officers have probable cause to
believe contraband is present - (correct answer)True
In technical terms, an arrest occurs whenever a law-enforcement officer restricts a
person's freedom to leave - (correct answer)True
