Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 15 pages
Exam (elaborations)

LJU4804 PORTFOLIO (ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 15 pages

Well-structured LJU4804 PORTFOLIO (ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED. (DETAILED ANSWERS - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!)..... QUESTION 1 Instructions: Read the set of facts below and answer the questions that follow. LJU4804 OCT NOV 2024 3 John and Mary Smith got married in Hawaii in December 1983. At that time, they were British citizens and Mary was domiciled in London, while John was working in New York on a two-year fixed term contract with the possibility of further renewal. However, just before the marriage, John was offered a very senior permanent position with a South African retail brand and he had entered into negotiations with the company at that stage. They relocated to Johannesburg, South Africa shortly after getting married and established a domicile there. Two children were born from the marriage and Mary stayed at home to look after them full-time. In 2022, Mary filed for divorce in the South Gauteng High Court. She also applied for a redistribution of assets. 1.1 Which legal system applies to the formal validity of John and Mary’s marriage in terms of the South African rules of private international law? (2) 1.2 How would the South African court determine where John was domiciled at the time of entering into the marriage? Note: The court must determine where he was domiciled in December 1983. (3) 1.3 Mary’s legal counsel would like to argue that the proprietary consequences of the parties’ marriage are governed by South African law as the intended matrimonial domicile when the parties got married. Advise her legal team on their prospects of success considering relevant case law. Your answer must include a properly referenced, full case discussion of Sadiku v Sadiku 30498/06 (unreported) as well as the relevant points in this regard from the prescribed article by Neels and Wethmar-Lemmer 2008 TSAR 587 – 596. (15) 1.4 Assume for purposes of this question that John was found to be domiciled in England at the time of entering into the marriage. Would Mary be successful in obtaining a redistribution order in terms of s 7(3) of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979? Discuss the different views with reference to case law in this regard. (10) 1.5 Mary executed a will in Hawaii in which she appointed John as her sole heir. At the time of execution of the will, she was domiciled in England and a British citizen. She retained her British citizenship throughout her life. After her divorce from John was finalised, Mary executed a second will in France that expressly revoked her first will and appointed her two children as her heirs. At the time of its execution, she was domiciled in South Africa. Mary’s first will was formally valid in terms of Hawaiian law (only). Mary’s second will was formally invalid in terms of all its possible testing systems, but formally valid in terms of Hawaiian law. In terms of the rules of intestate succession of Hawaii, France and South Africa, her two children would be LJU4804 OCT NOV 2024 4 her intestate heirs. Mary died from a heart attack in May 2023. Who would inherit her estate? Note: You have to apply the relevant provision of the Wills Act 7 of 1953. (5) 1.6 John gave Mary a BMW motor as a gift in February 1984. During the divorce proceedings, the court had to determine the validity of the donation. Assume that, in terms of English law, donations between spouses are regarded as a personal consequence of marriage, but that under South African law, it falls under proprietary consequences of marriage. 1.6.1 Under which legal category (or categories) will the two potentially applicable legal rules be placed if lex fori classification is followed? (2) 1.6.2 Under which legal category (or categories) will the two potentially applicable legal rules be placed if lex causae classification is followed? Explain your answer. (3) [5] [40] QUESTION 2 A French international wine trading company, VIN SARL, is considering concluding a contract with a South African co-operative winery for the purchase of a large consignment of South African wines. Advise the CEO of VIN on the following: 2.1 If an arbitration clause is inserted into the contract electing all disputes arising out of same to be settled by means of arbitration administered by the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), would VIN have a reasonable chance of having the award being recognised and enforced in South Africa? (Note: Discuss the relevant provisions of the International Arbitration Act 15 of 2017 (IAA) and the 1958 New York Convention as incorporated.) (8) 2.2 If South Africa is elected as the seat of arbitration, is there enabling legislation in place that provides an effective procedural framework for international arbitrations? (Note: discuss the most important procedural provisions in the IAA and the UNCITRAL Model Law as incorporated.) (12) [20] QUESTION 3 Instructions: Read the set of facts and answer the questions that follow. Aqua (Pty) Ltd is a South African company with its principal place of business in Durban. Wasser GmbH is a company incorporated in terms of the laws of Germany with its principal LJU4804 OCT NOV 2024 5 place of business in Hamburg. In January 2023, Aqua purchased a large consignment of filtered water from Wasser. Payment had to take place by means of a confirmed letter of credit issued by RMB (Durban) and confirmed by Hamburg Commercial Bank AG. The goods were to be shipped FOB (Hamburg). The contract included a choice of law clause indicating German law (a CISG contracting state) as the proper law of the contract. 3.1 Explain the difference between a confirmed and unconfirmed letter of credit. (2) 3.2 Describe and contrast the FOB and CIF INCOTERMS. Note: Your discussion must be based on your prescribed reading material by Van Niekerk and Schulze. (8) 3.3 May contractual parties opt out of the application of the CISG under circumstances where it would apply to their contract? Note: refer to the relevant provision of the CISG. (2) 3.4 When non-conformity of goods is alleged by the buyer, what are the duties of the buyer and seller? What remedies are available to the buyer? Note: Discuss and apply the relevant provisions of the CISG.

Content preview

LJU4804
PORTFOLIO Semester 2 2024
Unique Number:
Due Date: 18 October 2024

QUESTION 1

1.1.

In terms of South African private international law, the legal system that applies to the formal
validity of a marriage is determined by the law of the place where the marriage was
celebrated (lex loci celebrationis). Since John and Mary were married in Hawaii in December
1983, the law of Hawaii would govern the formal validity of their marriage. Thus, Hawaiian
law applies to the formal requirements of their marriage, such as whether the marriage was
properly solemnized according to the legal standards in Hawaii.
DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
1. Educational Aid: These study notes are designed to serve as educational aids and should not be considered as a
substitute for individual research, critical thinking, or professional guidance. Students are encouraged to
conduct their own extensive research and consult with their instructors or academic advisors for specific
assignment requirements.
2. Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the
information provided in these study notes, the seller cannot guarantee the completeness or correctness of all
the content. It is the responsibility of the buyer to verify the accuracy of the information and use their own
judgment when applying it to their assignments.
3. Academic Integrity: It is crucial for students to uphold academic integrity and adhere to their institution's
policies and guidelines regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as a
tool for learning and inspiration, but any direct reproduction of the content without proper acknowledgment and
citation may constitute academic misconduct.
4. Limited Liability: The seller of these study notes shall not be held liable for any direct or indirect damages,
losses, or consequences arising from the use of the notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor grades,
academic penalties, or any other negative outcomes resulting from the application or misuse of the information
provided.

, For additional support +27 81 278 3372


QUESTION 1

1.1.

In terms of South African private international law, the legal system that applies to the
formal validity of a marriage is determined by the law of the place where the marriage
was celebrated (lex loci celebrationis). Since John and Mary were married in Hawaii
in December 1983, the law of Hawaii would govern the formal validity of their marriage.
Thus, Hawaiian law applies to the formal requirements of their marriage, such as
whether the marriage was properly solemnized according to the legal standards in
Hawaii.



1.2.

In private international law, domicile is determined by both physical presence and the
intention to remain in a particular place indefinitely. At the time of entering into the
marriage in December 1983, the South African court would need to assess John's
domicile by considering two key factors:

1. Physical Presence: The court would examine where John was physically
present before and during the marriage. In this case, John was working in New
York on a fixed-term contract at the time of the marriage.

2. Intention to Settle: The court would also look at John’s intention regarding
where he intended to make his permanent home. Although John was living in
New York temporarily, he was in negotiations for a permanent position in South
Africa before the marriage. If John intended to settle in South Africa
permanently once he secured the job, his domicile at the time of marriage would
be South Africa. However, if his intention at the time was to remain in New York
indefinitely, that could indicate domicile in New York.

The court will assess whether John had formed a fixed intention to reside permanently
in South Africa by considering his negotiations for the job and other relevant factors.
Since domicile is determined by a combination of physical presence and intent, the
court would ultimately make a fact-based determination on whether John had an
intention to remain in South Africa at the time of marriage.

Connected book
 image
Publisher: 2012 ISBN: 9780702194221 Edition: Unknown

Document information

Uploaded on
October 15, 2024
Number of pages
15
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$4.80

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Edge
4.2
(1352)
Sold
10888
Followers
4256
Items
3179
Last sold
6 hours ago


Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions