Tutors you can trust. Voted “BEST
SELLING” memos for the year 2022/2023.
IRM1501
Introduction to Research Methodology for Law and Criminal
Justice
PORTFOLIO
MEMO
SEMESTER 2 – 2024 - UNISA
UNIQUE NUMBER: - 153813
DUE DATE: - 2 - 10 OCTOBER 2024
Includes Footnotes and/or Bibliography.
PREVIEW
QUESTION 1
Discuss empirical research and its components and provide examples where necessary.
(5 marks)
QUESTION 2
Find the case of Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/5) [206] ZACC 3; 206 (6) BCLR 709
(CC); 206 (4) SA 2 (CC) (26 April 206) and discuss this case in the prescribed format [the
facts of the case; legal question; ratio decidendi, or reasons for the decision; and
finding(s)]. (5 marks)
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used by our Tutors to draft this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without any representations o
warranties, express or implied. This document is to be used for comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document ma
be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the Author. – LLB EXAMPACKS &
TUTORIALS.
PAST PAPERS & MEMOS, ASSIGNMENT MEMOS, NOTES, SUMMARIES & TUITONS
Cell: 062 810 8624 Email:
Fax: 086 096 5452 www.llbexampacksandtutorials.co.za
, QUESTION 1
Discuss empirical research and its components and provide examples where
necessary. (5 marks)
QUESTION 2
Find the case of Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/5) [206] ZACC 3; 206 (6) BCLR
709 (CC); 206 (4) SA 2 (CC) (26 April 206) and discuss this case in the prescribed
format [the facts of the case; legal question; ratio decidendi, or reasons for the
decision; and finding(s)]. (5 marks)
QUESTION 3
Discuss the case of Jafta v Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife (D204/07) [2008] ZALC 84; [2008]
0 BLLR 954 (LC); (2009) 30 ILJ 3 (LC) ( July 2008). (0 marks)
QUESTION 4
Find the case of Potgieter v National Commissioner of the South African Police
Services and Another (JS 700/05) [2008] ZALC 33; [2009] 2 BLLR 44 (LC); (2009) 30
ILJ 322 (LC) (0 October 2008).
Write an essay about this case covering the following:
. the facts of this case
2. the legal question
SELLING” memos for the year 2022/2023.
IRM1501
Introduction to Research Methodology for Law and Criminal
Justice
PORTFOLIO
MEMO
SEMESTER 2 – 2024 - UNISA
UNIQUE NUMBER: - 153813
DUE DATE: - 2 - 10 OCTOBER 2024
Includes Footnotes and/or Bibliography.
PREVIEW
QUESTION 1
Discuss empirical research and its components and provide examples where necessary.
(5 marks)
QUESTION 2
Find the case of Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/5) [206] ZACC 3; 206 (6) BCLR 709
(CC); 206 (4) SA 2 (CC) (26 April 206) and discuss this case in the prescribed format [the
facts of the case; legal question; ratio decidendi, or reasons for the decision; and
finding(s)]. (5 marks)
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used by our Tutors to draft this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without any representations o
warranties, express or implied. This document is to be used for comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document ma
be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the Author. – LLB EXAMPACKS &
TUTORIALS.
PAST PAPERS & MEMOS, ASSIGNMENT MEMOS, NOTES, SUMMARIES & TUITONS
Cell: 062 810 8624 Email:
Fax: 086 096 5452 www.llbexampacksandtutorials.co.za
, QUESTION 1
Discuss empirical research and its components and provide examples where
necessary. (5 marks)
QUESTION 2
Find the case of Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/5) [206] ZACC 3; 206 (6) BCLR
709 (CC); 206 (4) SA 2 (CC) (26 April 206) and discuss this case in the prescribed
format [the facts of the case; legal question; ratio decidendi, or reasons for the
decision; and finding(s)]. (5 marks)
QUESTION 3
Discuss the case of Jafta v Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife (D204/07) [2008] ZALC 84; [2008]
0 BLLR 954 (LC); (2009) 30 ILJ 3 (LC) ( July 2008). (0 marks)
QUESTION 4
Find the case of Potgieter v National Commissioner of the South African Police
Services and Another (JS 700/05) [2008] ZALC 33; [2009] 2 BLLR 44 (LC); (2009) 30
ILJ 322 (LC) (0 October 2008).
Write an essay about this case covering the following:
. the facts of this case
2. the legal question
