• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 762 pages
Exam (elaborations)

Primary Care The Art and Science of Advanced Practice Nursing

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 762 pages

Test Bank for Primary Care The Art and Science of Advanced Practice Nursing: An Interprofessional Approach 6th Edition by Debera J. Dunphy All Chapters included LATESTTest Bank for Primary Care The Art and Science of Advanced Practice Nursing: An Interprofessional Approach 6th Edition by Debera J. Dunphy All Chapters included LATEST

Content preview

TEST BANK FORv v




v PRIMARY CARE ART v v




v AND SCIENCE OF
v v




v ADVANCED
v PRACTICENURSING-
v AN
v INTERPROFESSIONA
LAPPROACH 6TH
v v




v EDITION- DUNPHY
v




v LATEST

,TEST vBANK vFOR vPRIMARY vCARE vART vAND vSCIENCE vOF vADVANCED
vPRACTICE vNURSING v– vAN vINTERPROFESSIONAL vAPPROACH v5TH vEDITION
vDUNPHY

Chapter v1. vPrimary vCare vin vthe vTwenty-First vCentury: vA vCircle vof vCaring


1. A vnurse vhas vconducted va vliterature vreview vin van veffort vto videntify vthe veffect vof
vhand vwashing von vthe vincidence vof vnosocomial v(hospital-acquired) vinfections vin
vacute vcare vsettings. vAn varticle vpresented vfindings vat va vlevel vof vsignificance vof
v<0.01. vThis vindicatesvthat




A) The vcontrol vgroup vand vthe vexperimental vgroup vwere vmore vthan v99% vsimilar.


B) The vfindings vof vthe vstudy vhave vless vthan v1% vchance vof vbeing vattributable vto vchance.


C) The veffects vof vthe vintervention vwere vnearly vzero.


D) The vclinical vsignificance vof vthe vfindings vwas vless vthan v1:100.


Ans: vB


Feedback: vThe vlevel vof vsignificance vis vthe vlevel vat vwhich vthe vresearcher vbelieves vthat
vthe vstudy vresults vmost vlikely vrepresent va vno vchance vevent. vA vlevel vof vsignificance vof
v<0.01 vindicates vthatvthere vis vless vthan v1% vprobability vthat vthe vresult vis vdue vto vchance.




2. A vnurse vhas vexpressed vskepticism vto va vcolleague vabout vthe vvalue vof vnursing
vresearch, vclaiming vthat vnursing vresearch vhas vlittle vrelevance vto vpractice. vHow vcan vthe
vnurses vcolleague vbestvdefend vthe vimportance vof vnursing vresearch?




A) The vexistence vof vnursing vresearch vmeans vthat vnurses vare vnow vable vto vaccess
vfederal vgrantvmoney, vsomething vthat vdidnt vuse vto vbe vthe vcase.

,B) Nursing vresearch vhas vallowed vthe vdevelopment vof vmasters vand vdoctoral vprograms
vand vhasvgreatly vincreased vthe vcredibility vof vthe vprofession.




C) The vgrowth vof vnursing vresearch vhas vcaused vnursing vto vbe vviewed vas va vtrue
vprofession,vrather vthan vsimply vas va vtrade vor va vskill.




D) The vapplication vof vnursing vresearch vhas vthe vpotential vto vimprove vnursing
vpractice vandvpatient voutcomes.




Ans: vD


Feedback: vThe vgreatest vvalue vof vnursing vresearch vlies vin vthe vpotential vto vimprove vpractice
vand, vultimately, vto vimprove vpatient voutcomes. vThis vsupersedes vthe vcontributions vof vnursing
vresearch vtoveducation vprograms, vgrant vfunding, vor vthe vpublic vview vof vthe vprofession.


3. A vnurse vhas vread va vqualitative vresearch vstudy vin vorder vto vunderstand vthe vlived
vexperience vof vparents vwho vhave va vneonatal vloss. vWhich vof vthe vfollowing vquestions
vshould vthe vnurse vprioritizevwhen vappraising vthe vresults vof vthis vstudy?




A) How vwell vdid vthe vauthors vcapture vthe vpersonal vexperiences vof vthese vparents?

, B) How vwell vdid vthe vauthors vcontrol vfor vconfounding vvariables vthat vmay vhave
vaffected vthevfindings?




C) Did vthe vauthors vuse vstatistical vmeasures vthat vwere vappropriate vto vthe
vphenomenon vinvquestion?




D) Were vthe vinstruments vthat vthe vresearchers vused vstatistically vvalid vand vreliable?


Ans: vA


Feedback: vQualitative vstudies vare vjudged von vthe vbasis vof vhow vwell vthey vcapture vand
vconvey vthe vsubjective vexperiences vof vindividuals. vStatistical vmeasures vand vvariables vare vnot
vdimensions vof vavqualitative vmethodology.




4. Tracy vis va vnurse vwith va vbaccalaureate vdegree vwho vworks vin vthe vlabor vand vdelivery
vunit vof vavbusy vurban vhospital. vShe vhas vnoticed vthat vmany vnew vmothers vabandon vbreast-
feeding vtheir vbabiesvwhen vthey vexperience vearly vchallenges vand vwonders vwhat vcould vbe
vdone vto vencourage vmore vwomen vto vcontinue vbreast-feeding. vWhat vrole vis vTracy vmost
vlikely vto vplay vin va vresearch vproject vthat vtests van vintervention vaimed vat vpromoting vbreast-
feeding?


A) Applying vfor vgrant vfunding vfor vthe vresearch vproject


B) Posing vthe vclinical vproblem vto vone vor vmore vnursing vresearchers


C) Planning vthe vmethodology vof vthe vresearch vproject


D) Carrying vout vthe vintervention vand vsubmitting vthe vresults vfor vpublication vAns: vB
Feedback: vA vmajor vrole vfor vstaff vnurses vis vto videntify vquestions vor vproblems vfor
vresearch. vGrant vapplications, vmethodological vplanning, vand vpublication vsubmission vare
vnormally vcarried vout vbyvnurses vwho vhave vadvanced vdegrees vin vnursing.




5. A vpatient vsigned vthe vinformed vconsent vform vfor va vdrug vtrial vthat vwas vexplained
vto vpatientvby va vresearch vassistant. vLater, vthe vpatient vadmitted vto vhis vnurse vthat vhe vdid
vnot vunderstand vthe vresearch vassistants vexplanation vor vhis vown vrole vin vthe vstudy. vHow

Connected book
 image
Lynne M. Dunphy, Jill E. Winland-Brown, Brian Oscar Porter, Debera J. Thomas Primary Care
Publisher: 2022 ISBN: 9781719644655 Edition: Unknown

Document information

Uploaded on
September 17, 2024
Number of pages
762
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$14.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Edufiles
4.9
(217)
Sold
145
Followers
10
Items
7466
Last sold
2 weeks ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions