CloisterWraith
Section A: Diversity and Change
Evaluate the idea that language change is beyond prescriptive jurisdiction.
(30 Marks)
Any language, whether it be English or otherwise, are never static in their development through time.
They constantly morph, mould and adapt to the society it is spoken in and to the people who speak it. The
English language should be beyond prescriptive jurisdiction, past the control of prescriptivism, however it
is still something that has to be dealt with. The idea that we should continue to use language how it was
‘prescribed’ is a post-hoc rationale that doesn’t reflect the arguably more progressive society we live in
today.
The English language has arguably been tainted by prescriptive attempts at jurisdiction and control for
centuries. The idea that the language could be standardised was one held by 17th Century Grammarians
Bishop Robert Lowth- who claimed that we should ‘be rid of all vulgarisms’ - and, most notably, Dr Samuel
Johnson who created the renowned Dictionary (in 1755) that attempted to standardise the language for
good. The dictionary would attempt to standardise both the orthography and phonology of words and
ultimately provide for better communication. However his pedagogical approach and prescriptive ideology
were later reversed as he concluded it was “too difficult” to control language- as one dictionary is
published, it is immediately ‘outdated’. Therefore, this reinforces that the English Language- albeit not
beyond prescriptive jurisdiction, currently- there are reasons why such jurisdiction is difficult to maintain.
Section A: Diversity and Change
Evaluate the idea that language change is beyond prescriptive jurisdiction.
(30 Marks)
Any language, whether it be English or otherwise, are never static in their development through time.
They constantly morph, mould and adapt to the society it is spoken in and to the people who speak it. The
English language should be beyond prescriptive jurisdiction, past the control of prescriptivism, however it
is still something that has to be dealt with. The idea that we should continue to use language how it was
‘prescribed’ is a post-hoc rationale that doesn’t reflect the arguably more progressive society we live in
today.
The English language has arguably been tainted by prescriptive attempts at jurisdiction and control for
centuries. The idea that the language could be standardised was one held by 17th Century Grammarians
Bishop Robert Lowth- who claimed that we should ‘be rid of all vulgarisms’ - and, most notably, Dr Samuel
Johnson who created the renowned Dictionary (in 1755) that attempted to standardise the language for
good. The dictionary would attempt to standardise both the orthography and phonology of words and
ultimately provide for better communication. However his pedagogical approach and prescriptive ideology
were later reversed as he concluded it was “too difficult” to control language- as one dictionary is
published, it is immediately ‘outdated’. Therefore, this reinforces that the English Language- albeit not
beyond prescriptive jurisdiction, currently- there are reasons why such jurisdiction is difficult to maintain.
