CCJS 100 EXAM 2 COURT CASES EXAM REVIEW QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS, GRADED A+/| latest update 2024/25|

CCJS 100 EXAM 2 COURT CASES EXAM REVIEW QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS, GRADED A+/ Tennessee v. Garner (1985) Says that the police may not use deadly force with a fleeing felon, unless it is a must to keep that suspect from escaping, and that there is probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a threat of death or serious injury to the officer or to others Terry v. Ohio (1968) Allows an officer to frisk a person if they are being detained for questioning, to ensure the officer's safety, checking to make sure the person doesn't have a weapon that can do harm Chimel v. California (1969) Officers may search for weapons during an arrest Stop and frisk doesn't always occur first United States v. Drayton (2002) When you give consent, the police don't have to inform you that you can say no to them, it is up to you to know your rights. Whatever the police finds is fair game to be used against you Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Custodial interrogation - Miranda rights are only required before custodial interrogation. - They aim to inform the suspect of their rights before police seek a confession. - While they can be read during arrest, it's not required at that point. - The rights are essential when you're in custody, cannot leave, and the police are seeking a confession. Berghuis v. Thompkins (2010) Suspect didn't assert his rights, didn't say he was using them, and he didn't speak so he wasn't answering questions. The police asked him unrelated questions about God forgives him for murder. The police used this as a confession. This was allowed in the court because the guy didn't assert that he was using the Miranda rights. Weeks v. United States (1914) prohibits illegally obtained evidence on federal level l Mapp v. Ohio (1961