CCJS 100 UMD Exam 2 Madoo 57 Questions And Answers

Tennessee v. Garner(1985) - ️️If an officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a threat of serious bodily harm either to fellow officers or to others, it is not constitutionally unreasonable to prevent escape by using deadly force. Terry v. Ohio (1968) - ️️An officer may perform a search for weapons without a warrant, even without probable cause, when the officer reasonably believes that the person may be armed and dangerous. Chimel v. California (1968) - ️️Supreme Court decision that endorsed warrantless searches for weapons and evidence in the immediate vicinity of people who are lawfully arrested. United States v. Drayton (2002) - ️️Decision declaring that police officers are not required to inform people of their right to decline to be searched when police ask for consent to search. Miranda v. Arizona (1966) - ️️U.S. Supreme Court decision declaring that suspects in custody must be informed of their rights to remain silent and to be represented during questioning. Berghuis v. Thompkins (2010) - ️️The Court held that unless and until the suspect actually stated that he was relying on that right (5th Amendment), his subsequent voluntary statements could be used in court and police could continue to interact with (or question) him. The mere act of remaining silent was, on its own, insufficient to imply the suspect has invoked his or her rights. Furthermore, a voluntary reply even after lengthy silence could be construed as implying a waiver. Weeks v. United States (1914) - ️️Supreme Court decision applying the exclu- sionary rule as the remedy for improper searches by federal law enforcement officials Mapp v. Ohio (1961) - ️️Supreme Court decision that applied the exclusionary rule as the remedy for improper searches by state and local officials.