Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 5 pages
Summary

Summary Controlling the People - Weimar Republic, Nazi Germany, West Germany

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 5 pages

Summary and comparison of control in Germany from 1918-89, looking at differences between the Weimar Republic, Nazi Germany and West Germany.

Content preview

Controlling the people 1918-89
- Forced to rely on the army/freikorps to control extremist
Attempts to control extremism 1918-32 threats
- Lack of reform undergone by institutions created biases and
Nature of opposition to gov’t imbalance control
- L-wing believed Weimar wasn’t radical enough → e.g. the judiciary and army’s leniency towards the Kapp putsch
- R-wing believed wanted a strong authoritative gov’t and lack of action taken to prevent the uprising
- Weimar est. basic rights that gave ppl the freedom of speech - Overlapping power of the Chancellor and the President created
and the freedom of press confusion
- Important for the gov’t to prove that it was stable, esp after - Overuse of Article 48 made President an ersatzkaiser
WWI and the Kaiser’s rule
Censorship, repression and propaganda 1933-45
Making concessions
- Ebert-Groener Pact Nov 1918 - mutual agreement of support Media
between the gov’t and the army and allowed the army to shut Radio
down the L-wing threat - All broadcasting was under Nazi control
- Stinnes-Legien Agreement - ensured that industry wasn’t - 70% German homes had the ‘People’s receiver’ - cheap radio
nationalised → key to preventing a Marxist revolution - Public places had to broadcast the radio
- ‘Radio wardens’ were allocated to towns and co-ordinated
Regional disruption gathering to listen to the radio
- Varying degrees of control between each Lander - Success? - everyone had to listen to the radio
- Weimar constitution was not adopted at the same time in
Press
each Lander → Thuringia didn’t hold elections until June
- Before - each region had strong regional attachments to the
1920
newspaper issued there
- Red Bavaria - example of Lander independence from gov’t - Nazi publishing house Eher Verlag bought papers from each
- Freikorps had to be used to restore order in regions defying the
region → controlled ⅔ press by 1939
constitution
- Threatened to remove state gov’t if they didn’t follow the - New agencies merged into one to form the DNB → vetted
Weimar system all news material
- Propaganda ministry held daily press conferences to provide
Imbalanced control guidance on editorial policy

, Controlling the people 1918-89
- Editor’s Law 1933 - newspaper content had to be controlled by Literature
the editor - >2500 writers left 1933-45, e.g. Thomas Mann
- Success? - not many ppl frequently read the paper due to bland - Less literary group rose that accepted the regime
journalism - Encouraged classic literature, e.g. Shakespeare
Cinema
Berlin Olympics - Cinematic reputation from Weimar maintained
- Intention: glorify the regime and spread Nazi ideological - Major film studios were in the hands of nat’lists, e.g. Goebbels
themes in a positive light - Jewish actors and directors fled Germany, e.g. Marlene
- 42m Reichsmarks spent on Olympic sports complex and Dietrich
stadium - Genres: overt propaganda, pure escapism, emotive nat’lism
- Broadcasted the Olympics on radio in 28 languages
- 4-hr documentary film made - Olympia Visual arts
- Tv broadcasts reached 150,000 ppl in 28 public tv rooms in - Rejected Weimar art and Bauhaus → burnt in a fire
Berlin - Anything modern was rejected
- Reinforced the Aryan ideal w/ athletes - Held 2 contrasting exhibitions: Weimar’s ‘degenerate’ art and
- Germany finished first w/ 89 medals Nazi ‘great German’ art
- Glorified volksgemeinschaft, classic styles and romanticism
Nazi ritual - Disliked non-representational/abstract art
- Heil Hitler greeting
- Horst Wessel anthem The police state
- Militaristic uniforms
- Public festivals commemorated historic days in the Nazi Himmler and the SS
calender - 1933 - SS m/ship = 52,000
- Efforts to reform customs never transcended society - Himmler created the SD in 1931 as an internal party security
police
Culture - All party and state police organisations were overseen by
Music Himmler as part of the RSHA
- Encouraged classical music and classical german musicians, - Functions: policing, intelligence, treatment of opponents and
e.g. Bach and Beethoven military action of Waffen SS
- Most music was banned - jazz and dance-band labelled as
‘negroid’ and ‘decadent’ Policing by the Gestapo and Kripo
- Jewish composers banned - Kripo - maintained general law and order, e.g. dealing w/
thieves and asocials

Document information

Study Level
Subject
Uploaded on
December 23, 2023
Number of pages
5
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Summary
$8.25

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Sold
0
Followers
0
Items
25
Last sold
-




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions