the PLB [1847-1871] was most
effective in managing the plight of
the poor than the PLC [1834-47]
Tags
intro:
If managing the plight of the poor is judged in terms of reducing the costs of providing relief
and changing and improving the way in which paupers were treated then it can be argued at
the PLB was more effective than the PLC
Bc it reduces strain financially on parishes within unions that struggled under the PLC and
separated medical treatment of papers from general poor relief
∴ And it's shows a clear improvement in management of the plight of the poor
main body:
1) in terms of reducing the cost of managing the plight of the poor, it can be argued that the
PLB brought significant changes and so can be seen as more effective than the PLC
an improvement and reduction in cost can be particularly seen through the PLB's
introduction of the union chargeability act in 1865
transferred the cost of poor relief from individual parishes within a union to the
unionism home
there was less economic burdens on the parishes who were responsible for large
numbers of paupers due to an increasingly mobile population
this act was clearly an effective measure in reducing the cost of poor relief when
managing the plight of the poor and therefore shows a beneficial changeto the PLB
brought in since
under the PLC, it had not been the responsibility of the whole union in terms of the
cost of distributing relief but instead it was the responsibility of the individual parishes
some parishes had suffered since some were more overwhelmed than othersand so
the introduction of the 1865 union chargeability act shows a clear improvement when
managing the plight of the poor by the PLB in comparison to the PLC's
Therefore in terms of improving the cost of poor relief it can be argued the PLB was more
effective than the PLC as it brought in beneficial change
2) in terms of improving the treatment of the poor, the PLB took significant action particularly in
terms of separating the medical treatment of paupers from the general relief from poverty
the PLB [1847-1871] was most effective in managing the plight of the poor than the PLC [1834-47] 1
effective in managing the plight of
the poor than the PLC [1834-47]
Tags
intro:
If managing the plight of the poor is judged in terms of reducing the costs of providing relief
and changing and improving the way in which paupers were treated then it can be argued at
the PLB was more effective than the PLC
Bc it reduces strain financially on parishes within unions that struggled under the PLC and
separated medical treatment of papers from general poor relief
∴ And it's shows a clear improvement in management of the plight of the poor
main body:
1) in terms of reducing the cost of managing the plight of the poor, it can be argued that the
PLB brought significant changes and so can be seen as more effective than the PLC
an improvement and reduction in cost can be particularly seen through the PLB's
introduction of the union chargeability act in 1865
transferred the cost of poor relief from individual parishes within a union to the
unionism home
there was less economic burdens on the parishes who were responsible for large
numbers of paupers due to an increasingly mobile population
this act was clearly an effective measure in reducing the cost of poor relief when
managing the plight of the poor and therefore shows a beneficial changeto the PLB
brought in since
under the PLC, it had not been the responsibility of the whole union in terms of the
cost of distributing relief but instead it was the responsibility of the individual parishes
some parishes had suffered since some were more overwhelmed than othersand so
the introduction of the 1865 union chargeability act shows a clear improvement when
managing the plight of the poor by the PLB in comparison to the PLC's
Therefore in terms of improving the cost of poor relief it can be argued the PLB was more
effective than the PLC as it brought in beneficial change
2) in terms of improving the treatment of the poor, the PLB took significant action particularly in
terms of separating the medical treatment of paupers from the general relief from poverty
the PLB [1847-1871] was most effective in managing the plight of the poor than the PLC [1834-47] 1
