• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 2 pages
Exam (elaborations)

Which party is more internally divided? - essay plan

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 2 pages

Complete essay plan; received 100 UMS at A2 level US Politics, and am now at University study Politics. This is a complete essay plan, structured in a way that splits up the questions thematically - rather than simply yes/no - and has substantial debate within each theme, supported by evidence, analysis and evaluation gathered from external reading.

Content preview

Which party is more internally divided?

The Republicans have become more conservative:
• The rise of the Tea Party and other conservative factions
o Deep mistrust of the establishment and distaste for moderation and the ‘middle way’ –
uncompromising with the other factions
o Re-emerged following Obama’s election
o Have become increasingly influential – “The ideological trajectory of the GOP in recent years
has been driven by the Tea Party” (Lara Brown, 2016) ~ 5 of the 10 Senators and 40 of the
130 House members they backed in 2012 won, and they backed some of the Presidential
candidates – “Many of the contenders for the Republican nomination owed their jobs to the
Tea Party” (Moore)
o They have worked alongside the Republican Study Committee – a conservative faction
with over 100 members – to create the American Taxpayer Bill of Rights, that sought to
reduce the deficit without tax increases or spending cuts from defence
• Newt Gingrich and the ‘Republican Revolution’ of 1994
o Gingrich and the Heritage Foundation orchestrated the Contract with America, that
aligned them with conservative values – it united the right wing of the party, and ultimately
led to them winning 54 seats in the House and 9 in the Senate
o It strengthened the conservative wing, and its influence has lived on vicariously through
GOP candidates – e.g. Romney moved further to the right the longer the election went on
(dropping Romneycare), and Ted Cruz appealed to the right to try to win the nomination
• Party purity groups disciplining the party
o Murukami (2008) outlines that ‘party purity’ groups are PGs that seek to uphold the
ideological purity of the party by placing candidates under litmus tests to ensure they align
with the conservative wing of the party – e.g. Club for Growth
o “Party purity groups are partly responsible for hastening the polarisation within the parties” –
Murukami
o Heaney (2012) argues that the presence of Club for Growth pushes prospective
candidates right in the hope of achieving the nomination e.g. Romney and Cruz – “By
posing a threat to incumbents who don’t follow party line, the Club inspires prospective
Republicans to stick to pure conservative values”
• Evaluation:
o There has been united opposition towards Obama’s reforms
§ Obamacare unanimously opposed, the 2013 autumn budget, 2011 Super
Committee, the GOP’s 2015 budget proposal
§ This united support behind the GOP has shown that the party isn’t as divided as
people think it is, and arguably, the presence of Obama has further united the
GOP around conservative values
o Can be argued the Republicans have become more liberal:
§ Liberal factions and caucuses
• Emergence of Rockefeller Republicans e.g. the Financial Establishment
Faction (anti populist conservatism e.g. the Tea Party) and the
Compassionate Conservative Faction (big government supporters)
• Main Street Partnership (a ‘big tent’ group that seeks to move the party to
the moderate centre – has 65 House and 4 Senate members, and increase in
23 House members since 2012 – within the bloc are Obama Republicans)
• The Tuesday Group (founded in 1994 to counter the Republican Revolution,
and still has 50+ members)
§ Lack of real influence with the Tea Party
• People are mistaking noise for influence, and in reality, it doesn’t
determine party platforms, rather it tries to lobby
• Only won a small percentage of their House candidates, and it lost 20% of
their seats gained in 2012 in 2014
• Thus, the Tea Party is only influential as a reactionary vote

Connected book
 image
Anthony J. Bennett A2 US Government and Politics
Publisher: mei 2013 ISBN: 9781444183542 Edition: Unknown

Document information

Study Level
Subject
Uploaded on
March 1, 2017
Number of pages
2
Written in
2015/2016
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Only questions
$5.51
Purchased by 0 students

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
maxcollingbourne
4.6
(319)
Sold
295
Followers
258
Items
63
Last sold
5 months ago


Reviews from verified buyers




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions